SAS

- Heroes are born when bullets fly, when the earth explodes, when cannons roar, when trumpets fade. -

[SAS @Lord_SAS]

Remember, the war never ends.

[cow @cowincrisis]

saw you drive past the field and not wave at us. i’ll remember this.

[Dave W Plummer @davepl1968]

I managed to get RetroPad, my full-feature-parity version of Notepad from XP, down to 2686 bytes of tight x86 assembly.

I checked in the exe to make life simpler, so you don't need masm on hand!

Episode coming shortly... follow so you don't miss it!

Code: https://t.co/Kl736oVuvC

[Michael Shanks @MichaelShanks]

Gotta signal boost this one guys!!!

[Michael Shanks @MichaelShanks]

Call @AmazonMGMStudio ask for “Blair Fetter”

[Michael Shanks @MichaelShanks]

I’m gonna simply say this: if you are at all interested in a Stargate show with ANY of the original creators/performers involved, now is the time to say something. Otherwise it really will be the end of that chapter forever. Let them know you are THERE

[Joseph Mallozzi 🏴‍☠️ @BaronDestructo]

Well this is a hastily cobbled together shit-take of conjecture and misdirection.

The author starts by misreading a grassroots marketing launch as a statement of exclusive intent. Come on.  Announcing a series TO a fandom alongside its community leaders is standard PR; it's not proof that the show was designed exclusively FOR fandom. In fact, it was made clear from the start that, first and foremost, the series would function as an accessible entry point for new viewers...while still respecting canon.  And, by the way, “Respecting canon” does not mean “requiring new viewers to be familiar with 350+ hours of existing Stargate programming” as this article implies.

The author proceeds to support their point by launching into fan fiction: "No plot details were revealed about the scrapped show, but I can easily imagine…”  And they certainly do.  What follows is a parade of clichés, a generic legacy-sequel checklist that the author has conjured up from nothing and pinned to the new show as predictive evidence.

Then comes the claim that Starfleet: Academy failed because the showrunners: "focused too much on paying tribute to the series' past.”  Uh, wut?  Yes, Starfleet: Academy did receive a fair amount of criticism, but strict adherence to canon wasn't on the list of grievances.  This reads like a comment from someone who likely never even watched the show, much less perused the fan response.

They state: "Rebooting the cannon also would let the new Stargate showrunner bring back the Goa'uld, the franchise's most iconic villains…”  No, it wouldn’t.  Know why?   Because the goa’uld... ARE CANON!!!!

The article concludes with a disconnected meditation on an old Stargate storyline with no relation to either the new show or the author’s own argument.

I want to say it was written by A.I., but surely A.I. would display more logical consistency than this.

[Michael Shanks @MichaelShanks]

🙋‍♂️I also dispute their claim

[Michael Shanks @MichaelShanks]

Fans be spittin’ truths today. And I’m here for it…

[SAS @Lord_SAS]

@NoahVerrier Perfection

[Noah Verrier @NoahVerrier]

My oil painting of a grilled cheese sandwich

[Nature Unedited @NatureUnedited]

Bear tries to scratch some more but misses the tree

[Bohemia Interactive @bohemiainteract]

Be honest.

What's the best game you've ever played? And don't worry, we promise not to get jealous if it's not one of ours. (Okay, maybe a little.) 👀

Drop it below.

[Michael Shanks @MichaelShanks]

Yep. They did that.

[Joseph Mallozzi 🏴‍☠️ @BaronDestructo]

@PoMoTrickster Tell him we tried!

[Joseph Mallozzi 🏴‍☠️ @BaronDestructo]

Nope. No. Sorry. Gonna have to push back on this. We were ever mindful of creating a show that would have broad appeal.

[SAS @Lord_SAS]

@sweetcarolinatv

[SAS @Lord_SAS]

I just backed Crown & Courage on @Kickstarter https://t.co/J7j5HtUvUj

[SAS @Lord_SAS]

Wait. It doesnt have a timer setting?

[Happy Captain @EODHappyCaptain]

Turn on the coffee pot.

[TheNewPhysics @CharlesMullins2]

🚨 SPACEX JUST GOT FAA APPROVAL TO TEST ITS NEW “STARFALL” CAPSULES.

These are not regular reentry vehicles.
SpaceX’s new circular Starfall capsules are designed to bring up to 1,000 kg of payload back from orbit safely, repeatedly, and at scale.

They can launch on either Falcon 9 or Starship, perform in-space manufacturing, then reenter and splash down in the Pacific for rapid recovery.

Why this matters:
• Enables true commercial in-space manufacturing (microgravity + vacuum) that can be returned to Earth
• Could become a “proliferated successor” to the ISS for self-sustaining space industry
• Opens the door to rapid point-to-point cargo delivery from orbit to anywhere on Earth
• Directly competes with companies like Varda that have been flying similar missions on SpaceX rockets

The deeper implication is massive:
We are moving from “occasional experiments in space” to routine manufacturing and logistics in orbit.

If Starfall works at scale, companies could build factories in space, produce high-value materials that can’t be made on Earth, and ship them back down regularly all without needing a full space station.

This is one of the clearest steps yet toward a real, self-sustaining commercial space economy.

What do you think will in-space manufacturing finally become a serious industry, or is this still too early?

Follow for more frontier space and future technology.

[Nature Unedited @NatureUnedited]

Gorilla dads are great at looking angry as they go along and tolerate anything the their kids are up