CryptoJ

I analyse crypto, catch trends b4 mainstream. DYOR always

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

i opened a big leverage position of $rune.

Am hearing big things in privacy meta that is coming to $Rune within two weeks.

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

Everyone will be talking about $Bitcorn this time next week and how they missed it

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

This looks like a utility gem on stonks.

AoHVuFNKTAEUc5aiC8HLWUWytNC3nkJ4jcnjyFQaiCJg

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

There is a ticker in privacy coins that am waiting so impatiently to get tokenised.

Am sure that shit gonna hit 5 mil straight.

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

$epep might go to millions.

happy that i bought before @pointfarmcap

lore is too good

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

https://t.co/FjLFah4RML

[Dell Technologies @Dell]

@Cr0c0d1 his name is Perry 🥹

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

Dell is pumping in the stock market. 📈

Did you know Dell has a dog named Perry? They posted him back in 2025 👀

I just tokenized $PERRY and paired it with $DELL.

3% tax on every transaction, distributed to holders in $DELL stock.

G53PEuP8T34aB5XwwWgp1ceCd1uCsqrePRTUbzeN4fvK

[Dell Technologies @Dell]

When you can feel your coworker staring at you from across the way. 👀

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

This might be next million mc token. Dev deploying insane improvements.

First sniper bot that lets you make money automatically.

[COPY @COPYBARA_RH]

sniper of $COPY got a solid upgrade

you can now save tokens to WATCHED and open a full score breakdown to see what's actually pushing a token into LOCK / TRACK / DROP

also added quicker access to CA, GMGN, PONS and explorer + more live data around flow, buyers, dev, taxes and curve

https://t.co/TbQYp9KN6Z

ca: 0xac79255f6f404eba14f316e8669d76573a2d7b1e

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

Why is https://t.co/E8t0QJ505S down?

Is it bcz of the insane volume?

Or somethng else?

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

Thesis: https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK vs https://t.co/pYA51ghyYV is not a clone story. It is an unfinished argument from Robinhood.

When a second Long appeared on Arc, the market reached for the simplest explanation: copycat.

I think that explanation is too small.

The fight didn’t start with a domain. It started when two early Robinhood launchpads took the same meta in different directions.

Robinvista and https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK were both there early. Long won the attention, volume, and eventually the brand. Vista didn’t.

What Vista did have were a few ideas before they became obvious: leveraged stock tokens, pre-IPO pairings, and memes built around those instruments rather than only spot names like NVDA or AAPL. At the time, these were experiments, not a crowded category.

Vista’s accusation is pretty specific. Long later brought versions of those products into its own app, scaled them, and gave no credit. Vista called it out. The callout went nowhere. Long kept the narrative.

That’s why I don’t think https://t.co/pYA51ghyYV should be viewed as some random impersonator of https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK.

Look at the context.

Related team. Same stock-pairing thesis. Different chain. Bridge Robinhood stocks to Arc and rebuild the market somewhere Long doesn’t already dominate.

Even the name feels intentional.

Nate is obviously right to protect the Long brand. Confusion creates room for scammers, and a second Long was always going to piss him off.

But Vista can also be right that going viral isn’t the same as going first.

One team shipped the primitive. The other made it famous.

So the interesting question isn’t “who copied the name?”

It’s whether a product that lost the Robinhood timeline just reopened the war on Arc.

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

@Natan_benish i think this is the issue:

https://t.co/M99e3NGFJD

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

Thesis: https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK vs https://t.co/pYA51ghyYV is not a clone story. It is an unfinished argument from Robinhood.

When a second Long appeared on Arc, the market reached for the simplest explanation: copycat.

I think that explanation is too small.

The fight didn’t start with a domain. It started when two early Robinhood launchpads took the same meta in different directions.

Robinvista and https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK were both there early. Long won the attention, volume, and eventually the brand. Vista didn’t.

What Vista did have were a few ideas before they became obvious: leveraged stock tokens, pre-IPO pairings, and memes built around those instruments rather than only spot names like NVDA or AAPL. At the time, these were experiments, not a crowded category.

Vista’s accusation is pretty specific. Long later brought versions of those products into its own app, scaled them, and gave no credit. Vista called it out. The callout went nowhere. Long kept the narrative.

That’s why I don’t think https://t.co/pYA51ghyYV should be viewed as some random impersonator of https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK.

Look at the context.

Related team. Same stock-pairing thesis. Different chain. Bridge Robinhood stocks to Arc and rebuild the market somewhere Long doesn’t already dominate.

Even the name feels intentional.

Nate is obviously right to protect the Long brand. Confusion creates room for scammers, and a second Long was always going to piss him off.

But Vista can also be right that going viral isn’t the same as going first.

One team shipped the primitive. The other made it famous.

So the interesting question isn’t “who copied the name?”

It’s whether a product that lost the Robinhood timeline just reopened the war on Arc.

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

Thesis: https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK vs https://t.co/pYA51ghyYV is not a clone story. It is an unfinished argument from Robinhood.

When a second Long appeared on Arc, the market reached for the simplest explanation: copycat.

I think that explanation is too small.

The fight didn’t start with a domain. It started when two early Robinhood launchpads took the same meta in different directions.

Robinvista and https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK were both there early. Long won the attention, volume, and eventually the brand. Vista didn’t.

What Vista did have were a few ideas before they became obvious: leveraged stock tokens, pre-IPO pairings, and memes built around those instruments rather than only spot names like NVDA or AAPL. At the time, these were experiments, not a crowded category.

Vista’s accusation is pretty specific. Long later brought versions of those products into its own app, scaled them, and gave no credit. Vista called it out. The callout went nowhere. Long kept the narrative.

That’s why I don’t think https://t.co/pYA51ghyYV should be viewed as some random impersonator of https://t.co/9XbVe93kAK.

Look at the context.

Related team. Same stock-pairing thesis. Different chain. Bridge Robinhood stocks to Arc and rebuild the market somewhere Long doesn’t already dominate.

Even the name feels intentional.

Nate is obviously right to protect the Long brand. Confusion creates room for scammers, and a second Long was always going to piss him off.

But Vista can also be right that going viral isn’t the same as going first.

One team shipped the primitive. The other made it famous.

So the interesting question isn’t “who copied the name?”

It’s whether a product that lost the Robinhood timeline just reopened the war on Arc.

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

@COPYBARA_RH talking abt price is bearish. hold to Devving n sharing updates. We take care abt price

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

Wtf is this 24k buy of $yar yet marketcap didnt move?

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

$yar should run

No cap. It is like $knots of $raydium

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

$yar should run

No cap. It is like $knots of $raydium

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

$cme launchpad for commodities pairing on RH is at 14mil

$omme being same launchpad on BnB is at 200k

0x9F9aCDe2EEBa94312244489e83efb07937167cD0

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

$stonkat deserves millions

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

$wcat chart looks sooo ready to pump.

HL4eZ5tyYCkhpSUyah1iB6iWFGVVSy8Eng5KL7sBpump

[CryptoJ @Lorrypump]

privacy cat meta is on fire
$btc at ATH
$nearcat at ATH
$monerochan at ATH
but the cat of tor is still 3k on stonk
tor is literally the biggest privacy browser and $onion is just sitting there like he us anonymous

2vM9gsDmM7qJyDDiX6hXA8gLorrpdHsHmcmSMiqVFNJ5å