@mehercle@SBarrettBar unfortunately, parliament are sovereign and can legislate on whatever they like. whether that be constitutional reforms, their acts are final. royal assent is more traditional than functional and its a given that the king will give assent. the last act refused was in 1708.
@fxckpgmol annoyingly under brighton he was shit for his first few seasons but when it clicks it works effectively. give him some time and he will turn good.
@Mellor8511@LFC92@Mobyhaque1 not a chance mate, kids got more pottential than caicedo and we spent nearly 30 million on him so would want more back on our investment
@JakeTalksFutbol I have nothing against him, I just think for now he's best as an impact sub for when those pop shots are needed late on. we have players like rutter who offer so much more in the build up and can create much better opportunities.
@JakeTalksFutbol I disagree, his hold up play was good, but he often slowed attacks down and didn't create any clear-cut chances. I get he's just getting minutes, but he's not scored since city in 22/23 season. Whilst taking more shots p/90 than most. his decision making should be questioned.
@JakeTalksFutbol he missed 2 sitters, sent 2 shots nearly for a throw-in and passed the ball off the pitch about 3 times when on the break within 45 minutes. he was lucky not to be taken off for rutter sooner.
@_Brightonian_ thing is we are 1 pt off 6th because of the talent we have brought in, most games we have been tactically over ran for the majority of the 90, bar Newcastle. we don't seem to have a rigid structure, which may be as we are only half way through the season, but we aren't improving