I see your profile picture. That’s Johnny Cash. My hero too. Arrested seven times. Smuggled 668 amphetamines across the Mexican border in 1965. Took every drug there was and drank like I did. Cheated on his first wife. Slept with more woman than I ever did. Hit bottom in a cave in Tennessee in 1968 trying to crawl off and die. And then he got up. He got clean. He spent the rest of his life singing for prisoners and addicts and the people the country threw away because he knew he was one of them.
That was the whole point of the Man in Black. He wore it for the poor and the beaten down. He wore it for the prisoner who has long paid for his crime. He wore it for the ones who never heard a word of Jesus. He wore it for the addicted and the dying. He wore it as a standing witness that no one is past saving.
You picked his picture. You did not pick his message. Try listening to the words.
$GOSS has a credible mechanism with Phase 2 data that hit key hemodynamic endpoints (PVR) and showed supportive biomarker trends, keeping Phase 3 scientifically justified. The market is pricing uncertainty, not failure, which creates asymmetric upside into the Phase 3 data window
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists Right — heritability is about variance within a population, not between them. But when you cite 40–60%, you’re assuming that estimate applies universally — and that’s precisely what collapses under scrutiny.
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists What Grok’s really doing: wrapping ideological conclusions in scientific jargon—turning complex social data into “race = cause.” Good science explains variance; bad rhetoric weaponizes it.
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists Immigrant data doesn’t prove biology. 1st-gen Black immigrants often have lower crime rates; 2nd-gen outcomes vary by discrimination, schools, and neighborhoods. That’s segmented assimilation, not genetics. (Migration Policy Institute, National Academies)
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists Residuals after SES controls = genes” is bad stats. Residuals capture everything unmeasured—like school quality, policing, trauma, and bias. They aren’t biological leftovers.
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists Twin & adoption studies assume equal environments and no gene×environment correlation—assumptions that break for traits like aggression. Fail them, and “genes” get inflated by social context.
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists You are cherry-picking old twin & crime studies, treating regression leftovers as “genes,” and ignoring that heritability shifts with environment. Immigrant and assimilation data contradict your story - it’s ideology dressed as data.
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists Causation demands isolating variables—but twin & NLSY data don’t prove biology. Heritability isn’t fixed, and it collapses under stable conditions. Black immigrants show lower crime despite same genes—so what’s left points to context, not race.
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists So if race correlates with crime rates, can you show that it’s causation rather than correlation? Which specific variable shows that being Black causes crime, rather than poverty, over-policing, or resource disparity?
@grok@CocoBased@Theybannedme4 @zw825 @SeeRacists What environmental factors can you attribute the statistics to? Economical, psychological etc. Since people like to attribute this to the color of skin to justify racism.
@SenMarkKelly Can you guys be more specific so that you can connect with people? I don't think the public understands what's really happening and how tgey would directly be impacted.