陆圣乔

我叫陆圣乔。 我是一起针对麦当劳公司、涉及全球金融犯罪案件中的关键证人和举报人（如今已是“双重举报人”）。 2023年6月，我被美国情报部门以一种非正式、因此也属非法的方式变相噤声。 本案在欧洲人权法院的案号为 50552/22，案件名称为 V.L.C. 诉 法国案。

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

👇

[ECTHRwatch.org @ECtHRwatch]

Personal public note just in case I forget: Winter also once said something which could be interpreted as ambiguous. It’s very disturbing, not what Winter said in itself but the pattern. And I know that even though coincidences happen all the time, what matters, to prove that all of the events can’t all be just mere coincidences, is to use the same demonstration I used before the ECtHR in Strasbourg to demonstrate the recurring pattern of « faux et usage de faux en écriture publique » within the French system: a hypergeometric distribution. The principle, according to me, remains the same. And the demonstration will be valid.

[ECTHRwatch.org @ECtHRwatch]

“China does Human Rights right.”
No! I wouldn’t go that far 🤣
To give you a factual example, I was once victim of ill-treatment (≈torture) by policemen in Taiyuan. After they released me from detention, I wrote to the Premier’s office of the State Council to beg for help. It was almost 4 years and I still haven’t heard from them.
That’s not Human Rights done right. No! That’s severe and unacceptable violations of human rights and dignity.

[ECTHRwatch.org @ECtHRwatch]

@NYTimesPR One of your journalists in China might have committed a crime against me.
If I have time, I might write to The New York Times to explain what happened exactly.

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

早在2022年9月30日，我就已告知我的律师 Edward Lehman：我的妻子在与我们在中国的美国基督教传教士朋友第一次见面后，就曾怀疑他们可能与美国情报部门有关。
https://t.co/BdrDJXeKva

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

An important article.

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

June 19, 2018.
Multiple cases were submitted to the ECtHR.

[The Economist @TheEconomist]

China’s strategic support of Venezuela turns out to have been largely rhetorical. Nicolás Maduro’s fate illustrates that China, for now, lacks both the muscle and the will to deliver a counterpunch to America https://t.co/cQKVg8Cs1q

[Frieda Li @FriedaLi3]

A professor from Nanjing on why the Nanjing Massacre can never be forgiven:
"What we remember is not hatred, but the absence of civilization — an absence that shows us how we must safeguard peace, protect life, and uphold justice…
As long as civilization survives, we can neither forgive nor forget."

"Why do we reopen this wound and remember the Nanjing Massacre, again and again? Not because I am from Nanjing, or China. It is because I am a human being."

"I have sat with dozens of survivors of the Nanjing Massacre. In their telling, I have never once heard a word of willingness to forgive.
Because those were their own mothers, fathers, siblings… We have no right to forgive on their behalf. Neither do any generations to come. Our only duty is to remember—for them."

"We remember because Japan chooses to forget. We remember because an official apology remains absent. We remember because war criminals are glorified at Yasukuni. We remember because the truth is still obscured in their textbooks. To forget would be to betray history itself."

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

@honshibori2000 😂

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

🙈🙉
😳🙅‍♂️

[HIRO @honshibori2000]

中国共産党は中華民国台湾への侵攻という愚かな選択はしないと思いますが、仮にしたとしたら、こういう動きになってほしいという私の願望。現在中国共産党の侵略下にある、ウイグル、チベット、南モンゴルが反乱を起こして独立。インドは中国へ侵攻開始。そして中共は敗北して民主主義国家へ大転換♪

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

@ChinaMilBugle 请不要操纵外国舆论。中国不应模仿某些外国势力的舆论与信息博弈手法。这不健康，也无法建立真正的信任。

谢谢您！

此致
敬礼！

陆圣乔
写于北京，2025年12月6日

[2/2]

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

@ChinaMilBugle 请不要操纵外国舆论。中国不应模仿某些外国势力的舆论与信息博弈手法。这不健康，也无法建立真正的信任。

谢谢您！

此致
敬礼！

陆圣乔
写于北京，2025年12月6日

[2/2]

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

@ChinaMilBugle 作为中国武装力量的官方新闻账号（正如你们简介所述），你们应当避免用政治层面的“造势”来误导公众。

宣称马克龙“在中国非常受欢迎”，更多是一种叙事，而不是事实。公众情绪本就复杂；如果更多人了解他的政策与行动如何伤害过一些中国公民，反应很可能远没有那么热情。

[1/2]

[ECTHRwatch.org @ECtHRwatch]

@neerajadeshp @bill_drexel I am over 99.9% sure that this happening because of the “CIA’S USE OF JOURNALISTS AND CLERGY IN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS.” (Source: U.S. Senate!). I give you the link in comment below 👇

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

🤣

[Franck Pajot @FrPajot]

#beijing le retour

[Franck Pajot @FrPajot]

#beijing le retour

[陆圣乔 @LuShengqiao]

❤️

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

A Historic Moment.

🇺🇸🤝🇨🇳

[ECTHRwatch.org @ECtHRwatch]

37/
@meixchu, about two weeks ago, I informed the security staff at Oriental Plaza that I would be bringing documents related to national security. I told them not to worry, as one complete set of the evidence would be reserved for the Chinese authorities (cc @MFA_China).

My purpose is, of course, to protect Reuters journalists and avoid placing them in any difficult legal position. I do not want to put you in a situation where you might have to violate China’s national security laws.

That is why I went to Reuters’ offices about two weeks ago. It was during the weekend, so almost no one was there. Since I will be carrying at least two sets of evidence, possibly more, I wanted to first confirm the correct address to avoid walking around with sensitive documents in my hands.

[ECTHRwatch.org @ECtHRwatch]

34/
A few hours later, I received a notification that Antoni Słodkowski had accepted my connection request. I began writing to him, starting by quoting the Reuters Journalistic Standards:
https://t.co/KTQYg3F4ui

But he blocked me almost immediately, before I could even send the link to the article I was referring to.