Forgiveness is the foundation for growth. Without forgiveness, it’s impossible to move forward.
Most people, when they hear the word forgiveness, think either about whether they should forgive others or whether others will forgive them.
But there’s another kind of forgiveness that very few consider: forgiving oneself.
We are often our own harshest judges and critics.
"I shouldn’t have done this."
"I should’ve done that."
"I ruined my life (or life of others) with that one mistake..."
Until we learn to forgive ourselves, we cannot forgive others or accept forgiveness from them. When we blame ourselves, we’re unable to believe those who say to us:
"I forgive you."
Forgiveness begins with admitting our own flaws.
Whether our mistakes stemmed from selfishness or other negative traits lurking within us, or because we weren’t mature or wise enough to know and act better, acknowledging that we’re not the amazing, flawless, always just and positive person we like to think we are is one of the hardest yet most necessary steps toward freedom.
Only when I admit to myself that I’m a mixture of good and evil, and that I can’t do anything about it on my own, only then I am able to accept that others are the same. That they, too, sometimes act wrongly because that’s just how we humans are. And that we all need forgiveness and grace.
This awareness—this understanding that evil and inadequacy, alongside goodness and selflessness, are an inseparable part of us—is the gateway that opens the path to forgiveness. Forgiveness for others, but also forgiveness for ourselves.
The essence of grace (undeserved forgiveness of mistakes and transgressions) lies in its very nature: it’s undeserved. Such a grace, when we accept it, is the beginning of a new life, of new possibilities.
And it’s this undeserved grace and the possibility of new beginnings that God gave us when Jesus died, paying with His death for every one of our transgressions—those we’re aware of and those we don’t even realize.
But a new beginning isn’t everything.
How many prisoners, granted pardon and grace, return to prison because they simply don’t know how to live differently? Or because, when problems arise, it’s easier to react the way they always have?
It’s similar with us.
We’ve received grace, a royal pardon, because Jesus paid our debt with His death. Because of his death we can draw a big fat line behind our past and start living differently.
But can we do it? Do we have the tools to avoid bad decisions and always act right?
If Jesus had died and remained in the tomb, nothing in our lives would have changed. We’d still be that mixture of good and evil. We’d still act under various impulses—sometimes bad, sometimes good.
But Jesus didn’t just die. He rose from the dead as a victor over evil.
And He rose so that those who believe in His power and authority could receive the power to become a new creation, a new person.
To those who accept it, He gives the power to live not according to their former physical nature (that mixture of good and evil) but to become a new, spiritual creation that controls its body and mind. A new person who lives and draws inspiration and motivation from a spiritual source, from the supernatural power of the Spirit that God gives to those who love and follow Him.
And that is the true meaning of Easter.
Not just forgiveness and undeserved grace, but also empowerment and a real source of power to transform our lives.
World war 2 is defined from the German attack on Poland in 1939 and ends by conquering Japan. And this is recognised as the global struggle.
The Great Patriotic War is Russian subset of the WW2 that focuses only on German lead Axis invasion of USSR and it's conclusion on the day of German unconditional surrender after the fall of Berlin.
Russians teach about both, but most of their monuments in Russia are dedicated to The GPW, not to the WW2. That's why the post above is a lie.
It's like taking photo of Slovak National Uprising memorial and saying that Slovaks are saying that the WW2 started in 1944. It's just nonsense.
Those memorials are for the specific part of WW2.
Russia is not denying the WW2 by having their own memorials dedicated to their part of it.
@MasterMaliq It would lose a majority of terrorists attacks around the world (around 95%)
It would gain more peace.
This is of course just the one top answer for each, but I think it is very good deal already, so no need to elaborate further.
Pry, tell me how did Polish and German armies knew which parts to occupy if they didn't had partition agreement?
Use your brain. It is not possible without coordination beforehand. It wasn't like the Polish came across Germans and started fighting them or vice versa. They knew exactly when to and where to enter and where to stop. You had an agreement too. And even Churchill called you at that time a "hyena of Europe" for this.
Did USSR apologise? I doubt so. Did Russians apologise? I don't know. I heard about Duma admiting guilt and issuing apology for Katyn in 2010 and about some joint reconciliation meeting at Katyn that resulted into tragedy. I know that Putin once called the Rib-Mol pact immoral (it was around the time when Kaczynski apologised to us for your attack) but I don't know about any official Russian apology nor reparations.
Should they apologise and do reparations? Of course!
But, and that's the point I am making all the time - both those actions were the same to the substance (not scale). And as you are saying that Poland was not Hitler's ally, the same applies to Russia. They were not Hitler's ally, just exploited the opportunity.
Oh sorry, I didn't notice that the response came from someone else. You're right, I don't know about you bashing or not US.
The truth is that all sides did a lot of atrocities and bad decisions. The problem is that each side always depicts the other as evil without admitting their own guilt and their contributions to the problem.
So what's your point? Both USSR and US supplied Hitler until 1941. If you are bashing USSR, then you should be bashing US as well for being Hitler's allies.
Before 1941, American firms openly traded with Hitler. After 1941, direct trade from the US became illegal but they still had subsidiaries in occupied territories, like Chase Manhattan and JP Morgan in France. They collaborated with Nazis to freeze and seize the financial assets of French Jews. And it was never returned.
Thus, in 1938 Poland was an ally of Hitler in effect. You were an ally of Hitler until Hitler attacked you. How is it different from what Russia did?
PS: I don't dispute all the atrocities the USSR did, it was evil and Poland suffered a lot, not only then but also after WWII. I just want from you honesty about your country attacking my country together with Hitler. You have no basis to be righteous and call out USSR as evil without acknowledging your own guilt, because you did exactly the same one year before. And yes, Polish army did atrocities in occupied Czechoslovakian territory. Not on the scale the USSR did to you, but it still happened.
So, if you are bashing one side, first admit to your own guilt.
@Diploma58844720@MissionArtist Oh, US companies supplied Hitler through the whole war. Does it mean that they were allies?
And isn't it convenient to just ignore the betrayal of a country by then "allies" a year prior? Guess bad conscience of UK and France is why you are gaslighting what lead to the WWII.
Yes they had secret clauses. But that is not being an ally.
If you think that it does, than Poland was also an ally of Hitler in 1938. What secret clauses Poland had with Hitler when they divided Czechoslovakian borderlands?
Either both statements are true (USSR was ally and Poland was ally) or none is true (neither of them were allies, they just participated in the division of territory).
So what is it?
Was Poland an ally of Hitler in 1938?
If you say yes, Poland was an ally of Hitler in 1938, I will concede that in the same manner USSR was an ally of Hitler in 1939.
But if you say no, Poland was not an ally of Hitler in 1938 even if they coordinated with him the occupation of Czechoslovakian territory, then you cannot say that USSR was an ally when they coordinated with Hitler occupation of Poland territory. They just did to Poland the same thing that Poland did to Czechoslovakia a year prior.
@TheGayChrist@ZackPolanski Unfortunately, there was. It was evil and despicable culture. But nevertheless, it existed.
Culture: the shared, learned patterns of behaviour and belief that shape how a group experiences and interacts with the world
They weren't.
USSR signed non-aggression pact, the same as UK, France, Poland and others did WAY BEFORE (see bellow).
And as with dividing Poland, year before in 1938, UK and France gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler on silver plate and Poland PARTICIPATED on the territorial grab in Sillesia. Was Poland (WHO AT THAT TIME had non-aggression pact with Hitler) an ally of the Nazi Germany when they did that?
The land grab and later occupation of Czechoslovakia gave Hitler the military equipment he needed for your invasion. By helping Hitler to dismantle Czechoslovakia Poland actually gave him means to attack Poland.
Was the USSR attack on Poland justified? No, that was aggression, the same as was Hitler's attack and the same as was Polish attack on Czechoslovakia a year earlier.
But Russians and Germans weren't allies. The same as UK and France weren't allies with Hitler when they betrayed Czechoslovakia. The same as Poland was not a German ally and yet participated in attack on Czechoslovakia. You did what was convenient at that time for your agenda. Russians did the same to you a year later. What goes around goes around.
Four-Power Pact (Jul 1933): Signed by the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Germany
German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact (Jan 1934)
Munich Agreement (Sep 1938)
Franco-German Declaration (Dec 1938)
German-Estonian and German-Latvian Non-Aggression Pacts (Jun 1939)
Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (Aug 1939)
They weren't.
USSR signed non-aggression pact, the same as UK, France, Poland and others did WAY BEFORE (see bellow).
And as with dividing Poland, year before in 1938, UK and France gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler on silver plate and Poland PARTICIPATED on the territorial grab in Sillesia. Was Poland (WHO AT THAT TIME had non-aggression pact with Hitler) an ally of the Nazi Germany when they did that?
The land grab and later occupation of Czechoslovakia gave Hitler the military equipment he needed for your invasion. By helping Hitler to dismantle Czechoslovakia Poland actually gave him means to attack Poland.
Was the USSR attack on Poland justified? No, that was aggression, the same as was Hitler's attack and the same as was Polish attack on Czechoslovakia a year earlier.
But Russians and Germans weren't allies. The same as UK and France weren't allies with Hitler when they betrayed Czechoslovakia. The same as Poland was not a German ally and yet participated in attack on Czechoslovakia. You did what was convenient at that time for your agenda. Russians did the same to you a year later. What goes around goes around.
Four-Power Pact (Jul 1933): Signed by the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Germany
German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact (Jan 1934)
Munich Agreement (Sep 1938)
Franco-German Declaration (Dec 1938)
German-Estonian and German-Latvian Non-Aggression Pacts (Jun 1939)
Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (Aug 1939)
They weren't.
USSR signed non-aggression pact, the same as UK, France, Poland and others did WAY BEFORE (see bellow).
And as with dividing Poland, year before in 1938, UK and France gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler on silver plate and Poland PARTICIPATED on the territorial grab in Sillesia. Was Poland (WHO AT THAT TIME had non-aggression pact with Hitler) an ally of the Nazi Germany when they did that?
The land grab and later occupation of Czechoslovakia gave Hitler the military equipment he needed for your invasion. By helping Hitler to dismantle Czechoslovakia Poland actually gave him means to attack Poland.
Was the USSR attack on Poland justified? No, that was aggression, the same as was Hitler's attack and the same as was Polish attack on Czechoslovakia a year earlier.
But Russians and Germans weren't allies. The same as UK and France weren't allies with Hitler when they betrayed Czechoslovakia. The same as Poland was not a German ally and yet participated in attack on Czechoslovakia. You did what was convenient at that time for your agenda. Russians did the same to you a year later. What goes around goes around.
Four-Power Pact (Jul 1933): Signed by the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Germany
German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact (Jan 1934)
Munich Agreement (Sep 1938)
Franco-German Declaration (Dec 1938)
German-Estonian and German-Latvian Non-Aggression Pacts (Jun 1939)
Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (Aug 1939)
give me things that never happened for £500
waiting times for surgeries are counted in months not in minutes. My heart surgery was after 6 months and only because after six months I just came to the hospital and SQUATTED in department loby for 8 hours (including having pizza delivered - that shown them that I am really serious with my statement that I will not move until they will give me a date, they ignored me for the first 6 hours) before the doctor came and scheduled me for next week.
My girlfriend had cancer and even she waited two weeks for the start of treatment.
For my hernia surgery I waited 4 months. Meanwhile my ex-father in law had hernia in Czech Republic and he WAS diagnosed and had the surgery on the same day, all for free.
Their system is much more efficient because there are insurance companies keeping the hospitals in check. You don't pay for treatment, it's free, but you allocate healthcare portion of your taxes to a specific healthcare insurance company of your choice. That insurance company keeps doctors and hospitals accountable.
In UK noone keeps the NHS in check so they just scream that they need more money. The NHS is money grabbing inefficient enterprise full of middle managers and incompetent bafoons. NHS needs to be reformed or die.
@Wydenzoo I don't understand that mentality. In my country when you are invited for celebration, the bill is responsibility of the person inviting. Your responsibility is to bring gift. The person paying can limit spend by arranging with the venue set meal and max number of drinks paid.