Luis Rene Cardenas Jr

Conservative #SocialismCommunismSurvivor #Trump20&24 #Protect2nd #MAGA #BackTheBlue/LEOs #BuildTheWall #LtGenFlynn Being conservative does not make you racist

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

"Navy whistleblower targeted after questioning inaccuracies in billing data
By Sharyl Attkisson | December 27, 2023

The following is from Just the News.

Navy whistleblower is being investigated after posting a video on social media about irregularities in the Defense Department’s medical database.

Lieutenant Edward “Ted” Macie, who serves in the Navy Medical Service Corps, is under investigation after he posted a video of himself in uniform on the social media platform “X” a couple of weeks ago discussing irregularities in DOD medical billing data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), according to his lawyer, R. Davis Younts.

DMED is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s (AFHSB) “web-based tool to remotely query de-identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS),” according to the Defense Health Agency.

The database contains every International Classification of Diseases (ICD) medical billing code for all medical diagnoses submitted by the military for medical insurance billing.

Macie was eventually told to take the video down, which he did, Younts told Just the News last week.

However, on Wednesday, Macie was informed that he is suspected of violating Uniform Code of Military Justice Articles 92, Failure to Obey an Order, and 133, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer, according to his wife, Mara Macie.

She told Just the News that his Miranda rights were listed on the form titled, “Department of The Navy Military Suspect’s Acknowledgement and Waiver of Rights,” which stated the basis of the investigation.

According to Younts, however Macie has not been informed as to specifically what actions he allegedly committed that are being investigated.

Last year, military medical whistleblowers went to Congress about increases in common vaccine injuries in DOD medical billing data from DMED.

The DOD told PolitiFact after the whistleblowers came forward that the increase was due to a problem with the database from 2015 to 2020, but the 2021 numbers were accurate. The official said DMED was taken down to “identify and correct the root-cause of the data corruption.”

Mara Macie said that the DOD had “shut down DMED for a month” after the whistleblowers came forward, and then brought it back online and said that it was fixed.

However, after DMED was put back online, Macie reviewed the numbers and saw significant increases in potential vaccine injuries and other reported incidents, such as domestic abuse, boating accidents, and slips, trips, and falls, according to Mara Macie.

He reported the issues he believed were occurring with DMED’s data through his chain of command, but nothing happened, his wife said.

After some Congress members mentioned the military’s retention and recruitment problems, suggesting the military invite people back in who were kicked out over the Covid-19 vaccine mandate and give them back pay, Macie posted his video on “X,” noting problems with the DMED data and the lack of an investigation.

Mara Macie said that her husband has been posting about the DMED data on “X” since January but that this was the first time he posted a video about it. She added that many service members who received the Covid-19 vaccine have told Macie that they wish they hadn’t gotten the shot and believe they are experiencing adverse reactions from it.
..."
https://t.co/bQk4N8kHtu

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

The studies to cause high mortality rates, to cause infertility, which COVID-19 vaccines cause alongside possible neurological and cardiovascular illnesses, etc, have existed since at least the 1920s.

This all started with the eugenics programs and people like Margaret Sanger, George Soros, the Rockefellers, etc, all who wanted/want to cause high mortality rates worldwide because they all wanted, and continue to want, depopulation by the billions on Earth.

But who made the COVID-19 PLANdemic possible was Obama/Democrats and his administration.

These globalists will continue with their satanist agenda and they will push for more PLANdemics meanwhile they force people to be infected instead of being treated.

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

BTW, when all this was happening "Twitter" would delete my posts despite having tons and tons of evidence proving the facts about the PLANdemic, and the so called "Vaccines" that don't act like vaccines.

The same was happening to ANYONE who would doubt the claims from Faucci, or WHO, or China. They also suppressed anyone that posted evidence that contradicted the lies that FAuci, the mainstream media and social media were spreading while they were suppressing all legit information about COVID-19 and the "non-vaccines."

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

"‘Lockdowns Had Little to No Effect on COVID Mortality’: New Johns Hopkins Study

Brad Polumbo

But the costs of these draconian measures weren’t minimal at all.

We’re into year three of the COVID-19 pandemic. From mask mandates to vaccine passports, government restrictions on our liberties remain in place. But, thankfully, at least in the US, the era of lockdown orders confining Americans’ to their homes to “slow the spread” is over.

Unfortunately, a new meta-analysis of studies shows that all the pain and sacrifice we endured from those orders achieved little—despite their tremendous costs.

The new research review was led by economist Steve Hanke and published by Johns Hopkins University. It evaluated 24 relevant studies examining lockdown stringency, the impact of stay-at-home orders, and the effectiveness of specific restrictions. The meta-analysis concludes that “lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality.”

Why wouldn’t stay-at-home mandates effectively combat the pandemic? Well, to some extent they simply delayed the inevitable. Plus, research has shown that most COVID-19 spread actually occurred at home.

“Micro evidence contradicts the public-health ideal in which households would be places of solitary confinement and zero transmission,” University of Chicago economist Casey B. Mulligan concluded. “Instead, the evidence suggests that ‘households show the highest transmission rates’ and that ‘households are high-risk settings for the transmission of [COVID-19].’”

So, however disheartening it may be, it’s hardly surprising that Hanke and co. found such minimal public health impact from lockdown policies.

“Stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average,” their new research concludes. “[Stay-in-place orders] were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific [non-pharmaceutical restriction] studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.”

But the costs of these draconian measures weren’t minimal at all. They devastated the economy, pummeled the working class, fueled a youth mental health crisis, led to record-breaking drug overdoses, worsened a crime wave, delayed life-saving medical treatments, and so much more.

These devastating results offer a vivid reminder of a crucial lesson. When central planners, in their hubris, ignore the fact that their actions will have sweeping consequences beyond their intentions, human suffering ensues.

“It’s not enough… to endorse legislation that has a nice title and promises to do something good,” economist Robert P. Murphy wrote for FEE. “People need to think through the full consequences of a policy, because often it will lead to a cure worse than the disease.”

When it comes to lockdown policies, the “cure” has indeed proven far more harmful than helpful.
..."
https://t.co/RDSr4RR5Pe

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

VAERS only reported 1% of all adverse reactions people had because of the lies that the media, Fauci, etc, spread daily during the PLANdemic.

Watch the video at the following link.

"VAERS, Adverse Reactions from Vaccines, Fewer than 1% of adverse reactions are reported
Posted 2022-01-16, Bitchute

https://t.co/oZB6xINrkc

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

"doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 13.. 2021 Jan;159(1):85-92.Chest

Use of Ivermectin Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Ivermectin in COVID Nineteen Study

Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter 1, Michael S Sherman 2 , Naaz Fatteh 1, Fabio Vogel 1, Jamie Sacks 1 , Jean-Jacques Rajter 3
Affiliations
PMID: 33065103
PMCID: PMC7550891

DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.009

Abstract

Background: Ivermectin was shown to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 replication in vitro, which has led to off-label use, but clinical efficacy has not been described previously.

Research question: Does ivermectin benefit hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients?

Study design and methods: Charts of consecutive patients hospitalized at four Broward Health hospitals in Florida with confirmed COVID-19 between March 15 and May 11, 2020, treated with or without ivermectin were reviewed. Hospital ivermectin dosing guidelines were provided, but treatment decisions were at the treating physician's discretion. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included mortality in patients with severe pulmonary involvement, extubation rates for mechanically ventilated patients, and length of stay. Severe pulmonary involvement was defined as need for Fio2 ≥ 50%, noninvasive ventilation, or invasive ventilation at study entry. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounders.

Results: Two hundred eighty patients, 173 treated with ivermectin and 107 without ivermectin, were reviewed. Most patients in both groups also received hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, or both. Univariate analysis showed lower mortality in the ivermectin group (15.0% vs 25.2%; OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.96; P = .03). Mortality also was lower among ivermectin-treated patients with severe pulmonary involvement (38.8% vs 80.7%; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.47; P = .001). No significant differences were found in extubation rates (36.1% vs 15.4%; OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 0.88-11.00; P = .07) or length of stay. After multivariate adjustment for confounders and mortality risks, the mortality difference remained significant (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.80; P = .03). One hundred ninety-six patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort. Mortality was significantly lower in the ivermectin group (13.3% vs 24.5%; OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22-0.99; P < .05), an 11.2% (95% CI, 0.38%-22.1%) absolute risk reduction, with a number needed to treat of 8.9 (95% CI, 4.5-263).

Interpretation: Ivermectin treatment was associated with lower mortality during treatment of COVID-19, especially in patients with severe pulmonary involvement. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
..."
https://t.co/vfVOCifFve

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

Scientists have known FOR A LOOONG TIME how to treat illnesses like SARS-CoV, and they have also known that there are simple medications, and vitamins, that help prevent getting infected by COVID-19 and even get rid of it.

Since the media, Fauci and his thugs all banded together to lie claiming only their non-vaccines (mRNA vaccines don't act like vaccines but like the virus itself and cause the virus/infection) could help every single one of these people who suppressed FACTS we have known for over 2 decades plus should be put on trial "for crimes against humanity."

"Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

Research
Open access
Published: 22 August 2005

Volume 2, article number 69 (2005)
Cite this article

Martin J Vincent, Eric Bergeron, Suzanne Benjannet, Bobbie R Erickson, Pierre E Rollin, Thomas G Ksiazek, Nabil G Seidah & Stuart T Nichol

1.23m Accesses

1572 Citations

35433 Altmetric

264 Mentions

Explore all metrics

Abstract
Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-CoV). No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available.
Results

We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

Conclusion

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.
..."
https://t.co/ASLgBitHRF

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

"The Epoch Times

‘Unethical’ and up to 98 Times Worse Than the Disease: Top Scientists Publish Paradigm-Shifting Study About COVID-19 Vaccines
BY Jennifer Margulis and Joe Wang TIMESeptember 10, 2022 PRINT
A team of nine experts from Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and other top universities has published paradigm-shifting research about the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and why mandating vaccines for college students is unethical.
This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.
The paper is co-authored by Dr. Stefan Baral, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University; surgeon Martin Adel Makary, M.D., a professor at Johns Hopkins known for his books exposing medical malfeasance, including “Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won’t Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Heath Care”; and Dr. Vinayak Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist, who is a professor in the UCSF Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, as well as the author of over 350 academic and peer-reviewed articles.
But among this team of high-profile international experts who authored this paper, perhaps the most notable is Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D., current Director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, and professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Keshavjee has also worked extensively with Partners In Health, a Boston-based non-profit co-founded by the late Dr. Paul Farmer, on treating drug-resistant tuberculosis, according to his online biography.
..."
https://t.co/5YQnkXyYvt

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

"Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials

22 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2022 Last revised: 2 Sep 2022
Joseph Fraiman

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center
Juan Erviti

Navarre Health Service
Mark Jones

Bond University - Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare
Sander Greenland

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health
Patrick Whelan

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Robert M. Kaplan

Stanford University
Peter Doshi

- School of Pharmacy
Abstract

Introduction: In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We leveraged the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on potential adverse events of special interest identified by the Brighton Collaboration.

Results: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).

Discussion: The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
...
https://t.co/B7xZjDvvfB

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

@DNIGabbard https://t.co/hDyOWGmSLh

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

@DNIGabbard https://t.co/n7muCZLxOE

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

"Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route
Authors/Creators
Yan, Li-Meng1
Kang, Shu1
Hu, Shanchang1

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has led to over 910,000 deaths worldwide and unprecedented decimation of the global economy. Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained mysterious and controversial. The natural origin theory, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support. The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into certain recently published data, which, albeit problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus entered the human population are of pivotal importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in preventing similar, future pandemics.

Publication Note (July 17th, 2021):

The three Yan reports used scientific evidence and analyses to prove that SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweaponcreated by military scientists of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime. These reports have played a pivotal role in revealing the true identity of the ongoing Unrestricted Biowarfare. For this reason, the CCP and its allies have been constantly launching attacks at the Yan Reports. Very recently, the Rule of Law Foundation (ROLF) and Rule of Law Society (ROLS), which we have listed as our honorary affiliation in our reports, requested Zenodo to have the original uploads of our reports closed. This was done by the ROLF & ROLS without informing us authors or seeking our agreement. This is unacceptable because the work was done by us authors independently with no financial assistance provided by the ROLF & ROLS or any other organization. Their action here has no scientific basis and is against the rules of scientific publications. To restore the availability of our reports to the world, we have therefore re-uploaded the three Yan reports. Our affiliation has been changed to Yan Research – An Independent Research Team.

The current report was originally published on September 14th, 2020. As of July 16th, 2021, the original Zenodoupload of it has been viewed 1,339,786 times and downloaded 797,325 times. Upon mutual agreement, Dr. Jie Guan opted out of this publication and his contributions have instead been specified in the acknowledgements.
..."
https://t.co/msePt6oGsV

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

"Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

January 2020

DOI:10.1101/2020.01.30.927871

LicenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Prashant Pradhan

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

Ashutosh Kumar Pandey

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

Akhilesh Mishra

Krishna Institute Of Engineering And Technology

Parul Gupta

Stanford University

Abstract and Figures
We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019- nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.
...
https://t.co/yI6wk6hgm7

[DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard]

Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.

In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted.

https://t.co/pLMD0krc69

[Trump Lover❤🇮🇳🇺🇸 @SUBRATA30016572]

Drop a❤👍 if you support Tulsi Gabbard!!

[Luis Rene Cardenas Jr @LuisRC44]

@SUBRATA30016572 ❤️

[Tyler O'Neil @Tyler2ONeil]

🚨READ IT

The Justice Department just secured a superseding indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it reveals some new bombshells

🧵1/20

https://t.co/uRCbnWaBzr

[Tyler O'Neil @Tyler2ONeil]

Reminder: the SPLC raises money by claiming it exists to "dismantle white supremacy," but DOJ says the SPLC was actually propping up the hate it told donors it aimed to destroy. SPLC paid "field sources," whom SPLC says were merely informants.

🧵2/20

[Tyler O'Neil @Tyler2ONeil]

Yet the field sources used the SPLC's $ to:

1⃣Attend extremist rallies
2⃣Host rallies
3⃣Grow existing chapters
4⃣Create new chapters
5⃣Recruit individuals
6⃣Donate to extremist leaders
7⃣Purchase cross-burning material
8⃣Create racist paraphernalia
9⃣Pay living expenses

🧵3/20