@anonimusXuser@alhaadiahmad There is no evidence stop spreading the fake news.if it so Eritrea has the right to defend their country because your government said it load.
It is unfortunate, but we all know it is lies.
Is Eritrea scared of Ethiopia?
If Eritrea wants to invade Ethiopia, it will announce it to the whole world that see me, I am coming.
Eritrea is not a coward nation.
Isias Afwerki isn't scared, and if he was, Eritrea wouldn't be an independent nation today.
They think Eritrea is a country full of cowards, or thrives on propaganda and misinformation.
@HHaileyes20793@ERI1991TREA It will never happen our unity and peace is not came from no where we only know how so stop wishing just pray for your people
@HannaaLido@Jawar_Mohammed You will see who is going to be like you wishing remember your government who is his name 🤔 Mengistu Hailemariam run to Zimbabwe
THE GIVE-AND-TAKE FALLACY
Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed says Ethiopia respects its neighbors and seeks peaceful coexistence, yet insists Ethiopia needs “sovereign access” to the Red Sea through “give and take.”
Give and take what?
Eritrean sovereignty is not a commodity to be exchanged for ports, investment, infrastructure, trade, or security cooperation. Those are legitimate subjects for negotiation. Sovereign territory is not.
Ethiopia absolutely needs reliable and affordable maritime access. But being landlocked does not create a legal entitlement to another country’s territory. Ethiopia has achieved substantial economic growth while landlocked, demonstrating that access to the sea and sovereign ownership of coastline are two different questions.
The timing also matters. Diplomatic relations with Eritrea have sharply deteriorated, accusations are escalating, and military tensions remain a serious concern. In that environment, talk of acquiring sea access through “give and take” deserves scrutiny.
Commercial access is negotiable. Sovereignty is not.
If Ethiopia wants port access, trade corridors, infrastructure partnerships, or long-term commercial agreements, Eritrea and Ethiopia can negotiate mutually beneficial arrangements.
But if the objective is sovereign control over Eritrean territory, there is nothing to “give and take.”
Negotiate access. Respect sovereignty. Preserve peace.
#Eritrea #Ethiopia #RedSea #Assab #Sovereignty #Diplomacy #HornOfAfrica #Peace
I found the original video which was edited by Pp cadres🇪🇹 to fabricate fake news about the Eritrean forces.
The exact date of this footage is back in 26 January 2023, wisdrawal of the Eritrean forces from #Tigray.
https://t.co/FsVyDMnz5M
@pati_marins64@SudanTribune_EN
ERITREA ― Technically speaking, #Ethiopia’s declaration of war over #Eritrea began the moment PM Abiy Ahmed started openly questioning Eritrea’s statehood and sovereignty in front of his parliament three years ago, while publicly expressing ambitions to "annex" Eritrean ports by force and, if necessary, advance toward Asmara and seek to change the government, capacities aside, of course.
Since then, senior Ethiopian military officials have repeatedly made similar ambitions public, speaking about territorial expansion, redrawing of borders, and annexing Eritrean port of Assab, with little regard for Eritrea’s sovereignty or the principles of international law.
Had Eritrea not handled these provocations with remarkable restraint, the region could have been plunged into war long ago.
What is equally troubling is the response of the international community, including #Russia. While the U.S., #China, and the EU have expressed concern, very few countries, apart from #Egypt, #Sudan, and #SaudiArabia, have directly condemned Ethiopia’s threats and apparent ambitions to use force against a sovereign neighbor.
Silence, vague statements, or carefully worded diplomatic language can easily be interpreted as tolerance or tacit acceptance.
But sovereignty is not negotiable, and international law cannot be applied selectively. If continued threats and provocations leave Eritrea and its allies with no peaceful options, they may ultimately have to confront the threat directly and defend their sovereignty, regardless of the consequences.