Mark Bond

[Love Music @khnh80044]

43 years ago, Michael Jackson stepped onto the stage in that fedora and gave the world the moonwalk for the very first time 🕺✨
A legendary Billie Jean performance that still feels untouchable today 🔥🔥

[Khairallah AL-Awady @eng_khairallah1]

🚨 Anthropic's own team just showed how to actually use Claude Code properly.

30 minutes. free. the person who created Claude Code.

watch the workshop. bookmark it.

worth more than every $500 course you almost bought.

you've been using Claude without knowing 40 of its commands.

Then read the guide below.

[matrixbot @thematrixb0t]

Dr. Bryan Ardis drops a bombshell about magnesium, salt, blood pressure, and heart health.

A massive 20-year study across 49 countries and 450,000 people may flip everything mainstream medicine has told us.

[hinata @HinataMotivates]

The Dark Side of Technology.

[Cameron Murray @DrCameronMurray]

This was very weird

[Will @WillAttract]

"Did you know women who sleep naked next to their partner... lose weight faster than those who wear clothes to bed?"

[🇺🇸🇺🇸DADA🇺🇲🇺🇲 @BredsguardDalen]

Have you seen this Iran theory?

What's your thought on it?

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A community college professor taught the same study skills lecture for 30 years, and the video quietly became one of the most watched educational recordings on the internet.

His name is Marty Lobdell. He spent his career as a psychology professor watching students fail not because they were lazy, but because nobody had ever taught them how their brain actually works under the pressure of learning something hard.

The lecture is called "Study Less Study Smart." Over 10 million views. Passed around in Reddit threads, Discord servers, and university study groups for over a decade. And the core insight buried inside it has been sitting in cognitive psychology research for years, waiting for someone to explain it in plain language.

Here is the framework that completely changed how I think about effort.

Your brain does not sustain focus the way you think it does. Studies tracking real students found that the average learner hits a wall somewhere between 25 and 30 minutes.

After that, efficiency doesn't just decline. It collapses. You're still sitting at your desk, still looking at the page, but almost nothing is going in.

Lobdell illustrated this with a student he knew personally. She set a goal of studying 6 hours a night, 5 nights a week, to pull herself out of academic probation. Thirty hours of studying per week. She failed every single class that quarter.

She wasn't failing because she lacked effort. She was failing because she had confused time spent near books with time spent actually learning. The 25-minute crash hit her at 6:30pm every night. She spent the next five and a half hours sitting in the wreckage of her own focus and calling it studying.

The fix sounds almost too simple. The moment you feel the slide, stop. Take five minutes. Do something that actually gives you a small reward. Then go back. That five-minute reset returns you to near full efficiency. Across a six-hour window, the difference is not marginal. It is the difference between thirty minutes of real learning and five and a half hours of it.

The second thing he taught destroyed something I had believed about how memory actually works.

Highlighting feels productive. Going back over your notes and recognizing everything feels like knowing. But recognition and recollection are two completely different cognitive processes, and your brain is very good at making you confuse them.

You can see something you've read before and feel completely certain you understand it, even when you couldn't reconstruct a single sentence from memory if the page were blank.

He proved this live in the room. He read 13 random letters to his audience. Almost nobody could recall them. Then he rearranged the same 13 letters into two words: Happy Thursday. The whole room got all 13 without effort.

Same letters. Same count. The only thing that changed was meaning.

The brain stores meaning. Not repetition. The moment new information connects to something you already understand, the retention changes entirely.

This is what the cognitive psychology literature calls elaborative encoding, and it is the mechanism underneath every effective study technique.

The third principle was the one that hit me hardest, and the one almost nobody applies.

Lobdell cited research showing that 80 percent of your study time should be spent in active recitation, not passive reading. Close the material. Say it back in your own words.

Teach it to someone else, or to an empty chair if no one is around. The struggle of retrieval is where the actual learning happens. Reading your notes again is watching someone else do the work.

His parting line has stayed with me longer than almost anything else I have read about learning.

He told the room that if what he shared didn't change their behavior, they hadn't actually learned it. It would just live in their heads as something they had heard once and felt good about.

He was right. And most people leave every lecture exactly like that.

The students who remember everything aren't putting in more hours.

They stopped confusing the feeling of studying with the fact of it.

[Melinda Richards 🇦🇺🇺🇸 @goodfoodgal]

This was the moment the climate debate shifted - if only a little.

It was a moment of pure clarity & facts.

Love or hate Alan Jones, he nails it here and it is worth another listen.

[Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub @Ivermectinkart]

This is nothing short of a miracle.

Dr John Campbell breaks down the study of an 83yr old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had metastasised to the liver, spine and bones.

Usually a death sentence.

She took a daily dose of 222mg of FenBen for 8 months. Which normalised her liver enzymes. The tumor marker dropped from 316 to 36.

There was an absence of any abnormal metabolic activity indicative of cancer.

[Mrs. Lynda Matthews @MrsLynda77]

@Ivermectinkart Read this story a few years ago on substack
https://t.co/qYsgJQWhUU
Her son in law saved her.
He just wrote book and got released last week.
There's a great info interview on how fenben works. Well Worth listening to.

https://t.co/NtJlM2f19Z

[𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽ @idropFbombs]

I saw squares first but then I saw the circles after staring for a few seconds. Once I saw the circles, I could see both and switch between them.

Now imagine how much is hidden in plain sight in media and in real life that we don't see but our conscious mind still picks up?
This is how they brainwash us.

Do you see squares or circles?
👇🟣🟪❓️

[conspiracybot @conspiracyb0t]

This clip NEVER gets old

[conspiracybot @conspiracyb0t]

Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn: "The problem with the current climate change narrative is that it's false."

"It claims that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures, whereas actual data shows that it's world temperatures which control the carbon dioxide concentration."

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

By some miracle, the truth about the climate agenda somehow made its way onto mainstream UK television.

From 'Yes, Prime Minister' (2013).

Amazingly, this was produced by the BBC.

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

Why A4 paper is designed as 297mm x 210mm?

[📹 testandtutor]

[Net Zero Watch @NetZeroWatch]

🤫The Cult | A Net Zero Watch Short Film

The brilliant @ColinBrazierTV returns for our second short film on the cult of Net Zero and how it protects 'green' policies from being questioned by stifling debate and cracking down on free speech.

Produced by @OutpostStudios 🎥

[Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub @Ivermectinkart]

After a year of intensive research, Dr. William Makis presents the most critical graph of his career: the ivermectin dosing schedule for cancer.

According to Dr. Makis, for most cancers - including breast, colon, lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, and leukemias - a starting dose of 1mg per kg of body weight per day is recommended.

For a 60kg individual, this equates to 60mg daily:

- Five 12mg pills

- Or 6ml of liquid (approx. one teaspoon + 1ml)

The evidence for efficacy is compelling and dose-dependent:

- Dr. Shankara Chetty saw a prostate cancer patient's PSA drop from 89 to 11 on 45mg/day.

- A case from Dr. Tess Lawry showed CA125 (ovarian cancer marker) drop from 288 to 22 on just 0.2mg/kg.

- A long-term Castro study on children with leukemia showed no side effects after 6 months at 1mg/kg.

For aggressive cancers (pancreatic, brain), the blood-brain barrier may require a higher dose. Dr. Makis cites:

- Dr. Landrito's colleague with terminal gallbladder cancer: cancer disappeared after 14 months at 2mg/kg/day.

- The highest documented dose is 2.5mg/kg (Dr. Chetty), with only transient visual side effects that resolved.

Mainstream oncology will not offer this. Why? Ivermectin is generic, off-patent, and unprofitable. Consequently, there are no funded clinical trials.

Dr. Makis's powerful conclusion: "Using ivermectin in cancer is honestly very straightforward. It is a very, very safe drug."

His strong suggestion for those struggling: start at 1mg/kg/day. It can be taken for many months, even over a year, with an excellent safety profile based on long-term anecdotal evidence.

The power to fight may already be on your shelf.