@WeCareAboutMH@james_e_b_ We all know that there is none, and if you tried to find one you'd clearly see that you've been fooled. It's just a matter of deliberate misinterpretation, so instead of arguing with the judge they now can create a strawman and argue with it
@WeCareAboutMH@james_e_b_ Yes, please, walk me through to demonstrate your initial statement that she "was quite clear in claiming that the Suffragettes were not violent."
P.S. I know you won't be able to do it
@ergo_praxis You can't possibly claim you know how every supporter of Palestine interpret certain vague word. We have actual footage on how some of these supporters understood it, and Barnad supporting them clearly shows how he understands it
@ergo_praxis We saw how non genocidal it was on October 7th, and the call to globalise it clearly asks to follow the example, not to pursue "diplomatic isolation"
@WeCareAboutMH@james_e_b_ You can say whatever you want, but the judge never said they were less violent - it's a complete fabrication from PA supporters. Why can't they win their case by telling the truth and have to fallback to lies? We know the answer
@WeCareAboutMH@james_e_b_ "It is is not - as it claimed - a direct action disobedience protest group like the Suffragettes, operating transparently in the open" - is it this qoute? Doesn't look like she is describing the Suffragettes, she is talking about PA
@WeCareAboutMH@james_e_b_ She did not describe the Suffragettes at all. She stated that PA is not like them, and not peaceful as well. In fact, it was the defense claim, that PA is peaceful like the Suffragettes. Hence, you are arguing with PA defense, not the judge