MichaelAnderson7595

Liver of life, teller of truth, seeker of both.

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

Fantastic take here:

[Tom Elliott @tomselliott]

If you want to step back in time to recall what it was like when people doubting the Gospel of Fauci were being exterminated from the Internet, this supercut is for you:

[Stacy is Right @PoliticalStacy]

Dear Anthony Fauci... You didn't break me you little bitch.

[Glenn Beck @glennbeck]

.@RealTomHoman tears apart Mamdani's claim that ICE is just showing up in unmarked vans and taking people away:

“What Mamdani doesn't understand, we're doing the same thing we've done for decades: we're enforcing immigration law. And the reason we're wearing masks is because of the 8,000% increase in death threats, just not against the agents. Against their spouses and their children.

I've yelled at every Democrat on the Hill that says ‘take the mask off.’ I said, ‘We’ll take the mask off when you stop going on national media and comparing ICE to the Nazis and the secret police, because you are driving the hate.'

I said, ‘So why don't you support ICE, because they're enforcing laws that you wrote? So if they're the secret police for enforcing that, what's that make you? You wrote the law.’ So, stop the hateful rhetoric and the masks can come off quickly.”

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Depuis 50 ans, la gauche a réussi le plus grand hold-up intellectuel de l'histoire moderne.

Pas avec des armes. Pas avec des lois. Avec des mots.

Et honnêtement ? Chapeau. C'est génial. C'est diabolique. C'est du grand art.

Ils ont compris une chose qu'Orwell avait écrite noir sur blanc dans 1984 : celui qui contrôle le langage contrôle la pensée. Change les mots, et tu changes ce que les gens sont capables de penser. Rétrécis le vocabulaire, et tu rétrécis le champ du possible.

Dans 1984, ce n'est pas un détail. C'est le cœur du réacteur. Le ministère de la Vérité fabrique les mensonges. Le ministère de l'Amour torture. Le ministère de la Paix fait la guerre. « La guerre c'est la paix, la liberté c'est l'esclavage. » La novlangue ne décrit pas le monde — elle le remplace.

Et c'est exactement ce qui s'est passé. Regardez la mécanique :

Le « progressisme » ? C'est l'anti-progrès. Ceux qui bloquent le nucléaire, qui freinent la tech, qui diabolisent la croissance, qui rêvent de décroissance et veulent punir ceux qui construisent. Le mot dit « avant ». Le projet dit « arrière ».

L'« antiracisme » ? Il a réinjecté la race partout. Il assigne les gens à leur couleur, les enferme dans des cases, dresse les groupes les uns contre les autres. Un mouvement censé effacer la race l'a remise au centre de tout. Il a fabriqué le racisme qu'il prétend combattre.

Les croisades « contre l'homophobie » ? Elles crispent, elles clivent, elles imposent — et fabriquent en retour une partie du rejet qu'elles disaient vouloir éteindre.

La « protection » façon Union européenne ? C'est du flicage. On te surveille « pour ton bien », on te censure « pour te protéger », on te contrôle « pour ta sécurité ». Chaque mot est une inversion. Le vocabulaire de la bienveillance au service d'un projet orwellien.

Et le plus beau dans l'arnaque, c'est le verrou. Le piège parfait.

Aujourd'hui, des millions de gens lucides, qui voient parfaitement le problème… se taisent. Pourquoi ? Parce qu'ils refusent d'être traités de « racistes ». Sauf qu'être « antiraciste » au sens où le mot a été retourné, c'est précisément devenir raciste. Ils ont piégé les gens avec leur propre morale. Échec et mat.

Voilà le chef-d'œuvre : ils n'ont pas eu besoin de vous convaincre. Ils ont juste rendu le désaccord impensable, en confisquant les mots pour le formuler.

Alors oui — respect. Bonne guerre. Ils ont joué une manche, et ils l'ont gagnée.

Mais il y a un truc que la novlangue n'avait pas prévu.

Tout le monde a compris.

Le voile est tombé. Les mots reprennent leur poids. Et une inversion sémantique ne survit pas à l'instant précis où les gens la voient à l'œil nu. Ça, c'est terminé.

On reprend les mots. On reprend le réel. On reprend la partie.

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

In September of 1814, America was once again in trouble.

The young republic was only thirty-eight years old. The War of 1812 had gone badly. British troops had marched into Washington, burned the Capitol, set the White House ablaze, and now turned their sights toward Baltimore. If Fort McHenry fell, the harbor would be open, the city would likely follow, and another devastating blow would be dealt to the fragile nation.

Amid this uncertainty, a young American lawyer named Francis Scott Key sailed under a flag of truce to the British fleet. He had come to negotiate the release of a friend, a physician the British had captured.

He succeeded.

The British agreed to free the doctor.

But there was a catch.

Because Key and his companions had seen too much of the British fleet and learned too much about its plans, they were not allowed to return to shore. Instead, they were detained aboard a ship in the harbor and forced to watch the coming battle from behind enemy lines.

On the morning of September 13, the bombardment began.

For the next twenty-five hours, British warships unleashed somewhere between 1,500 and 1,800 bombs and rockets upon Fort McHenry. These were the “bombs bursting in air” and the “rockets’ red glare” of the song—not poetic embellishments, but terrible realities.

Key stood on the deck through the endless day and the long, terrifying night. Every explosion lit the darkness for a fleeting instant before the smoke swallowed everything again. Somewhere beyond that wall of fire stood the fort. Somewhere beyond it flew an American flag if it still flew at all.

He could not see.

He could only listen.

As long as the guns continued firing, there was reason to hope. The British would not waste ammunition on a fort that had already surrendered.

Then, just before dawn…

The guns fell silent.

For the first time all night, there was only stillness.

It was the most frightening sound of all.

Had the fort finally fallen? Had the defenders surrendered? Had the flag been torn down in the darkness while no one could see?

There was nothing to do but wait.

As the first light of September 14 slowly pushed back the smoke, Francis Scott Key strained his eyes toward the distant fort.

Then he saw it. Not a British flag.

The American flag. Still there. Still flying.

That flag was no ordinary banner. Months earlier, the fort’s commander had commissioned a Baltimore flagmaker, Mary Pickersgill, to sew a flag so enormous “that the British would have no difficulty seeing it from a distance.” It measured roughly thirty by forty-two feet, carried fifteen stars and fifteen stripes, and was so large it had to be assembled on the floor of a brewery because no ordinary room could contain it.

That was the Star-Spangled Banner.

The very flag Key saw through the morning mist.

The very flag that still survives today in the Smithsonian.

Overcome by what he had witnessed, Key reached into his pocket, pulled out an envelope, and began writing. The words came from a heart that had spent an entire night fearing his country might disappear with the dawn.

He first titled the poem Defence of Fort M’Henry.

Within days it was printed and circulating throughout the country. Before long, people began singing it to a melody they already knew—an old British tune called “To Anacreon in Heaven,” originally written for a London social club. There is something beautifully ironic in that: America’s most beloved patriotic song borrowed the melody of the very nation it had just survived. It also explains why the anthem is so notoriously difficult to sing. It was never written for ordinary voices gathered in stadiums or school assemblies.

The song spread quickly and became one of America’s favorite patriotic hymns, but it would wait more than a century before receiving official recognition. Not until 1931 did Congress declare “The Star-Spangled Banner” the national anthem of the United States.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

J'en peux plus des mecs de plus de 20 ans qui croient encore au Père Noël.

Alors je vais t'expliquer, comme à un gosse, à quel point c'est attardé de croire au socialisme.

T'es dans une classe de 30 élèves. Un élève bosse comme un fou et a 18 de moyenne. Un autre fait rien et a 4. Le prof décide que c'est injuste et donne à tout le monde la moyenne de la classe : 11.

Celui qui avait 18 arrête de bosser. Pourquoi se fatiguer si ça change rien ? Celui qui avait 4 continue de rien faire. Pourquoi bosser si on te donne 11 gratuitement ?

L'année suivante la moyenne de la classe est à 7. Puis 5. Puis 3.

Le prof ne comprend pas. Il pense que le problème c'est que les élèves ne sont pas assez solidaires. Alors il met en place des punitions pour ceux qui ne font pas assez d'efforts. Il surveille tout le monde. Il décide qui étudie quoi. Il interdit de changer de classe.

C'est exactement ce qui s'est passé. À chaque fois. Dans chaque pays. Sans exception.

URSS, Chine, Cuba, Venezuela, Corée du Nord, Cambodge, Éthiopie, Allemagne de l'Est. 40 tentatives. Même résultat. À chaque fois.

Le socialisme punit ceux qui produisent et récompense ceux qui ne produisent pas. Tout le monde finit par ne plus produire. Et quand plus personne ne produit, le gouvernement utilise la force pour obliger les gens à travailler.

C'est pas un accident. C'est le design.

Le Père Noël, au moins, t'arrêtes d'y croire vers 8 ans.

[MichaelAnderson7595 @MAnderson7595]

@DeMartini55 You're right about one thing... I wish YOU couldn't vote...

[Steven Crowder @scrowder]

She's right.

We do know what Muslims are doing in the West, we don’t have to guess.

It's about takeover. Their own Imams won't shut up about it.

[Desiree Rugani @desireerugani]

Elon Musk acabou de provar que a propriedade na América é uma ficção legal.

Musk: “Você é tributado pelo que ganha, tributado pelo que compra e tributado pelo que possui.”

Pense no que o imposto predial realmente significa.

Você trabalhou por décadas. Pagou tudo integralmente. A escritura está em seu nome.

Pare de pagar à governo sua taxa anual. Veja-os tomarem e venderem para alguém que pagará.

Você nunca possuiu aquela casa. Você estava apenas alugando de uma entidade com a qual nunca assinou um contrato.

O imposto de renda conta a mesma verdade em uma embalagem mais suave.

O governo não toma uma porção dos seus ganhos. Eles decidem quanto do seu próprio trabalho você tem permissão para manter.

Isso não é semântica. É uma confissão de quem o sistema acredita que seu tempo pertence primeiro.

O imposto sobre vendas enterra-se no recibo. Duas pessoas trocam valor voluntariamente. Um terceiro que não contribuiu nada leva uma fatia simplesmente por permitir que isso aconteça.

Agora empilhe todos os três.

Tributado quando você cria. Tributado quando você gasta. Tributado quando você segura. Tributado novamente quando você morre e tenta passá-lo para seus filhos.

Em nenhum ponto desse ciclo o sistema reconhece sua produção como sua.

Porque o dinheiro não é uma abstração. É a vida humana cristalizada.

Todo dólar tributado é uma hora que você já viveu, já sangrou por ela, já se foi.

O Estado não está gerenciando uma economia. Está reivindicando domínio sobre o tempo que você nunca recuperará.

E gastando em sistemas que você nunca pediu e ativamente se opõe.

A instituição que extrai tudo isso não enfrenta nenhuma obrigação de desempenho. Um contratado que não entrega nada é demitido. Uma burocracia que queima trilhões recebe um aumento de orçamento no próximo ano fiscal.

A SpaceX paga impostos às agências que obstruem seus lançamentos. A Tesla financia os reguladores que redigem regras para proteger seus concorrentes.

Os construtores não estão subsidiando o governo. Eles estão financiando seu próprio atrito.

O código tributário tem 74 mil páginas. Não porque a economia exija isso. Porque a extração teve que ser enterrada em complexidade suficiente para que você parasse de perguntar para quem ele foi desenhado para proteger.

O passado pertencia às pessoas que tributavam o mundo.

O futuro pertence às pessoas que o constroem.

[Yossi BenYakar @YossiBenYakar]

In his resignation speech, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer boasted that he protected British children from social media.
Someone needs to remind him that he was supposed to protect them from rape and sexual exploitation.

[Not the Bee @Not_the_Bee]

There used to be a two party system separated by ideology but unified in respect for the law and proliferation of shared American values.

Now there are no shared values. It’s just the people that like America vs the people that want to destroy it.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

EVERY FUCKING PERSON WHO HAS BEEN SCREAMING ABOUT THE EPSTEIN FILES FOR MONTHS...

...IS DEAD FUCKING SILENT ABOUT A QUARTER-OF-A-MILLION WHITE GIRLS BEING GANG RAPED BY MUSLIMS!!!

I DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT WHAT ANY OF YOU FUCKING PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY EVER AGAIN!!!!!!

[MichaelAnderson7595 @MAnderson7595]

@Tironianae If you won't nuke the filibuster, at least let Trump make recess appointments. Stop keeping the Senate artificially "in session"!

[VotersDeserveBetter @VotersDeserveUs]

Shouldn’t the rich pay their fair share? Isn’t it time to tax the rich? Progressives have said this before. They enacted a tax on the wealthy, claiming only the rich would pay. How did that turn out for working families? Watch and share. Beware of the left’s latest tax scheme.

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

Gavin Newsom, you hypocritical, champagne-socialist clown.

Spare the world your pathetic crocodile tears about Americans struggling with groceries and gas while Elon Musk becomes a trillionaire. Your state is the undisputed king of unaffordable everything—gas prices routinely $5.50–$6+ a gallon because of your insane taxes, regulations, and green grift that punish normal people.

Cost of living? Highest in the nation.

Housing? A nightmare.

Businesses and residents fleeing in droves on your watch. And you have the balls to cry “the system is rigged”?

Elon didn’t get rich by “buying the government.” And he didn’t have that Getty oil money either. He built actual shit—rockets that land themselves, EVs that dominate, Starlink connecting the planet—while creating thousands of high-paying jobs and turning regular employees into millionaires.

You? You inherited connections, ran wineries with billionaire handouts, climbed the political ladder, and now sit on a ~$30 million fortune while buying a $9.1 million Marin County mansion like it’s nothing.

“The federal government is for sale, the rich get richer”?

Projection from a guy who dined at the French Laundry during COVID lockdowns while telling everyone else to mask up and stay home.

You chased Tesla and SpaceX out of California with your idiotic policies, then seethe with jealousy when they succeed elsewhere.

The system isn’t rigged against the little guy. It’s rigged by talentless parasites like you who tax producers into oblivion, destroy cities with failed progressive policies, then lecture everyone about “equity” from your luxury compounds.

Sell the vineyard, the mansions, and the bullshit.

Until then, shut the fuck up, you jealous, grifting weasel. Nobody’s buying your class-warfare cosplay anymore.

[Mike Harlow @NotMikeHarlow]

“What is the evidence of voter fraud in LA?”

Imagine I tell you let’s play a game. We’re going to flip a coin. If it’s tails, I’ll give you $100. If it’s heads, you owe me $100.

Then I walk into the next room. When I return, I tell you “It was heads”.

Maybe I’m telling the truth. Maybe I’m a well intentioned and honest person, and the fact that this seems incredibly shady is just a total coincidence. Or maybe I scammed you. The point is you have no way of knowing. You may claim that I just scammed you… but there’s “NO EVIDENCE” that I did!

And THAT is our election process.

For years now in our elections, we have seen irregularity after irregularity, numbers that don’t make sense, math that doesn’t add up, statistical impossibilities — all of which always seems to exclusively benefit one party.

In our legal system, REASONABLE SUSPICION is the standard in which law enforcement can investigate a possible crime. Why is that not the same standard for our elections?

Every American deserves to have faith in our electoral process. And there is just no objective way that anybody can have faith in the current system. If our elections were clean, there would be transparency, and investigations would be welcomed.

School children are told “Show your work” when it comes to math homework. That’s all most of us are saying when it comes to the corrupt bastards handling these ballots:

Show your work. 🤔

[The Drunk Republican @DrunkRepub]

So you don’t feel comfortable celebrating America’s 250th anniversary because of our “complicated past” or some bullshit?

Cool, find me a country with a spotless history then.

You can’t.

And if you go looking you’ll soon learn this one is as close as they come.

Why do you think half the world risked life and limb to come here? And why you haven’t left.

Look, we all know America isn’t perfect; I’m Gen X and from the Deep South and I learned all about slavery and suffrage and the Trail of Tears every single year from elementary school through 12th grade.

They drilled it into our brains ad nauseam. We couldn’t ignore it if we tried, but when you celebrate someone’s birthday you don’t bring up all the dumb shit they did in the distant past, do you?

Of course not you miserable f***s!

It’s a party for the greatest country the world has ever known, not a struggle session centered on shit that happened a century ago.

But you know all this, you just look for stuff to cry about because the only way you keep any fraction of power is by keeping America divided; a truly “United States” would render your ideology extinct overnight.

And if Trump was half the dictator you claimed you’d be on the first train out of here. But he isn’t, and America isn’t the fascist nightmare state you love to pretend it is.

Quite the opposite, in fact, hence your being allowed to exist here.

If there’s anything still wrong with this country it’s people like you who take advantage of its generosity while also somehow playing the victim.

So grab your boxed wine, stream your Hasan Piker, and cry into your thrifted cat pillow.

Because George Washington, and the rest of us for that matter, are over your bullshit.

[Biff Zeppe @BZsSaloon]

Let's examine what REALLY happened.

When Donald Trump was a private citizen, a government contractor stole his private tax data and leaked it to the media. Because the government failed to protect his private records, Trump and his family sued the IRS for $10 billion.

On May 18, 2026, the Justice Department settled the case. Trump agreed to walk away with zero dollars for himself. In exchange, the government put $1.776 billion into an "Anti-Weaponization Fund" to help ordinary citizens who say they were also unfairly targeted by federal agencies. The government also agreed to completely drop its ongoing tax audits against Trump's businesses.

Trump declined $10 billion he was statutorily entitled to under 26 U.S.C. § 7431 and converted it into a compensation pool for other citizens, so calling this a corrupt enrichment scheme is factually backwards.

If anyone else got that award they would have taken it and ran. Joe Biden and every other Democrat out there.

The fund’s text explicitly says “there are no partisan requirements to file a claim,” meaning Democrats, independents, and Republicans are equally eligible.

The audit waiver is bound to pre-May-18-2026 conduct, not “perpetuity immunity forever” as the ridiculous media and out of job former attorney Liz Oyer claims.

Biden pardoned Hunter for crimes he was actually convicted of and Jim Biden while Jim was under two active federal investigations, with an 11-year window and zero public-facing remedy and the same commentators called that defensible. Literally.

So the Biden family could issue pardon for crimes committed and active investigations but Trump, who was actually agreed and is statutory entitled to this money set up a fund to help Americans who were victims of political persecution, and the demented media is calling it some kind of corrupt act?

Of course that same demented media wants judicial oversight. Would that be the judicial oversight that consistently rules incorrectly in any case involving Trump and gets overruled sometimes 9-0 at the Supreme Court?

Not one prior U.S. president has faced this volume of criminal prosecution, civil litigation, and unauthorized disclosure of confidential financial records simultaneously, so pretending this is a normal political cycle is dishonest bs.

The Obama administration used the exact same Judgment Fund mechanism in Keepseagle $760M, no congressional appropriation and the press called that justice. But it was actually much worse because in the Obama case this settlement was made against the advice of career DOJ officials who thought they could win at court.

Trump personally receives zero dollars, zero damages, and zero direct financial benefit from the settlement the only thing he gets is the audit waiver as protect protection so he won’t be targeted by the same Weaponized government should they ever get power again.

Congress will never legislatively compensate Jan 6 defendants, FACE Act defendants, or dismissed-case targets, so the choice was this fund or no remedy at all for documented victims of politically motivated federal action.

The media is very dishonest in this country and there’s a lot of experts who are even more dishonest. I am not an expert at anything except research and common sense. It is just basic common sense that when you have a president issue blanket, pardons for crimes that nobody even knows about that may or may not have been committed on his way out, and the media doesn’t bat an eye, but then you have a president who is actually wronged and who uses his settlement money to help those who are also politically persecuted smeared as corrupt the problem is the media.

-Insurrection Barbie