I’ve just heard rumour that Cherwell Larder, food bank in Kidlington is being forced to close or relocate after Oxford Council quadrupled rent at Exeter Hall!! Of all the stupid, heartless, disgusting, callous, money-grabbing moves…. @CherwellLarder @OxfordshireCC @TheOxfordMail
@GMB@julietdunlop It actually requires 2 full-time staff to operate - one to sit at the wheel and one to ride with passengers to check tickets. What is the point? It used to only need a driver!
@HishamSaid1972@ClimateRealists This data appears to be 2 hours old and shows highest CO2 in India to be about 145ppbv, according to NASA. Is that current enough for you?
If you do believe man made CO2 has anything to do with climate change (which I don’t), check out this great app to show what is going on in various places in terms of CO2 in the region. Look at UK 140ppbv compared to China 1030ppbv. Maybe #JustStopOil should pay them a visit!!
@rozjonez@BrewPob@latimeralder Rather than debating my use of vocabulary, I would rather debate how, according to that paper you attached, 77 CO2 molecules per million, therefore 0.000077% of the atmosphere, can have such dire consequences. I would love to see some scientific evidence to back this up.
@BrewPob@rozjonez@latimeralder So, what your article tells me, is that 77 molecules in a million (20% of 387), are going to be responsible for changing the temperature of the world, the acidity of the oceans and our ultimate down-fall of the all living organisms in this planet?
I’d love to see some evidence!
@BrewPob@rozjonez@latimeralder When I went to school I also learned to spell the word correctly. You should have been told about at “shool” a process called photosynthesis where plants take in the CO2 and output oxygen. CO2 is not poisonous, nor a pollutant. Maybe back to “shool” for you
CO2 makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere currently (25 times less than 1%).
Humans contribute just 3% of that. 3% of 0.04% is 0.0012% (833 times less than 1%).
Which means that, if we stopped human carbon emissions completely, it would make 833 times less than 1% of a difference to the atmosphere.
Even if we quadrupled our carbon emissions, CO2 would still only make up 0.0436% of the atmosphere, with only 0.0048% (208 times less than 1%) of the atmosphere being made up of human carbon emissions.
Hardly a drastic change in CO2 concentration.
Conclusion? Human carbon emissions are so negligible that they have basically zero effect on the climate, even if you assume (falsely) that carbon dioxide is the primary driver of climate change.
#ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030
@gothbunnyodoom It’s funny, cos according to this climate change article, you are going to be prone to floods and hurricanes. No mention of drought. It’s almost as if the ‘climate scientists’ are making it up! https://t.co/KOTdaWoPOj
@Auralforager @mi53946964@AlStewartOBE@IMFNews Try Googling the strong US dollar. It’s causing mayhem everywhere. Do some research before telling me to wake up.
@Auralforager @mi53946964@AlStewartOBE@IMFNews Open your eyes, there’s a big world outside the UK. Here’s another graph from South Africa. How the hell did Truss affect the rate for them? She didn’t. Biden is rising interest rates in US to curb inflation over there and has affected rates globally. MSM does not report this.