Sci-Nonfi

5th gen Canadian. MSc Engineer. Libertarian. Climate realist. Red-pilled.

[Kirk Lubimov @KirkLubimov]

Do you know what the G7 leaders didn't discuss? Climate change.

No one cares about carbon tax.

No one cares for decarbonized oil.

No one volunteered to increase costs on their economy. They want predictable and reliable supply.

Time for Mark Carney to move beyond his wealth transfer engineering and green agenda fantasies and listen to the market.

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

Denmark is held up as proof a fossil grid can be replaced. But electricity prices have more than doubled since 2000, to now sit amongst the highest in the world.

Moreover, the majority of what is labelled renewable is actually biomass, that is, wood. Trees are cut, often abroad, compressed into pellets, shipped in and then burnt for power.

At the smokestack, more CO2 is released than just simply burning gas. But it is labelled as "green" because the emissions are not counted at the power plant. They are 1) assigned to the country where the trees were cut, and 2) assumed to be reabsorbed by future regrowth.

So the system works like this: Cut trees, burn them, emit CO2, call it clean. Laughably, 64% of Denmark's renewable energy comes from this process.

[Daniel Brisson @DanbQc]

Le 🇨🇦 en fait partie
🚨 **14 pays** interdisent les réseaux sociaux à quelques mois d’intervalle seulement.

14 gouvernements différents.
14 systèmes juridiques différents.
14 constitutions différentes.

Et pourtant… une seule et même politique, appliquée presque en chœur 🤯

Vos « leaders » ne sont pas des chefs d’État.
Ce sont des **cadres intermédiaires** qui appliquent les directives d’en haut, en espérant une promotion dans la gouvernance mondiale.

Réveillez-vous. Ce n’est plus une coïncidence.

#CensureGlobale #GouvernanceMondiale #RéveillezVous #elbowsup
@FNLfreedomnews @MaximeBernier

[🏴‍☠️🇨🇦 GC 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️ @ce_msm]

C’en est fini de la liberté d’expression au Canada.

Les libéraux font passer en force les projets de loi suivants :

- C-9 (loi contre la haine)
- C-22 (accès légal/surveillance)
- C-34 (sécurité numérique)

Trois projets de loi qui, ensemble, anéantiront nos droits fondamentaux.

- C-9 (Loi contre la haine) :

Élargit considérablement la définition de la haine (haine/diffamation), supprime les défenses religieuses établies de longue date pour l’expression de bonne foi et facilite les poursuites criminelles sans le consentement du procureur général. Critiquer, prêcher ou même afficher certains symboles pourrait désormais vous valoir des accusations criminelles. Finies les protections pour la liberté d’expression religieuse et les débats publics sensibles.

- C-22 (accès légal) :

Oblige les fournisseurs d’accès Internet à conserver les métadonnées pendant un an, facilite l’accès à vos données par la police et le SCRS et permet au ministre d’imposer des droits d’accès (des portes dérobées déguisées). Surveillance de masse de vos communications numériques sans mandat. Votre vie en ligne devient totalement transparente pour l'État.

- Projet de loi C-34 (Loi sur la sécurité numérique) :

Ce projet de loi crée une puissante Commission gouvernementale de la sécurité numérique qui dictera aux plateformes, aux chatbots et aux services en ligne ce qu'ils doivent censurer, comment vérifier l'âge des utilisateurs et comment se protéger contre les contenus préjudiciables. Contrôle d'âge obligatoire, plans de sécurité imposés, amendes colossales et pouvoir discrétionnaire étendu pour décider de ce qui est acceptable. Une censure centralisée au nom de la protection des enfants. Ensemble, ces trois projets de loi transforment le Canada en un État de surveillance et de censure généralisée.

Vous ne pourrez plus parler, partager ni même penser librement sans risquer d'être signalé, surveillé ou poursuivi. Les voix dissidentes, les critiques de l'immigration, les débats religieux, les opinions controversées, tout devient risqué.
Roman Baber l'explique parfaitement dans cette vidéo de 9 min 36 s. Regardez-la avant qu'il ne soit trop tard.

Ce n'est plus de la gouvernance. C'est la mort de la liberté d'expression telle que nous la connaissions au Canada. Les libéraux ont choisi de bafouer totalement les droits des citoyens.
Réveillez-vous !
Partagez ce message.
Résistez !
Le temps presse.

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

VPN companies will leave Canada. The government will force companies to retain your data for one year. The legal threshold for police access to your data will be lowered. Meanwhile, the federal government is cancelling all debate on Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, in order to pass this legislation before Parliament adjourns on Friday, June 19. Now, more than ever before, Canadians who care about privacy must urge their Members of Parliament to defeat Bill C-22. This is a critical moment in our history: will Canada be a free nation or a surveillance state? Canadians have defeated "lawful access" legislation before, and we must do so again.

Contact your MP today: https://t.co/Q29tbbyKFO

[Nita Kang @NitaKang]

Wake up Canada.

Starmer, Macron, and Carney are simultaneously coming for our right to free speech.

It's not a coincidence.

It's not about the kids.

[National Post @nationalpost]

Josh Dehaas: The Liberals are using the excuse of protecting children to usher in an expansive censorship regime
https://t.co/3U06oAyHuD

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

This censorship law is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The real goal is to enable the UK government to track everyone.

[Michael Thomlinson @miket136]

Gun bans aren't intended to fight violent crime.

Social media bans aren't meant to protect children.

Limits to speech aren't meant to fight hate.

Wake up Canada, you're giving absolute control over your reality to the worst people on the planet.

[National Post @nationalpost]

The Liberals are using the excuse of protecting children to usher in an expansive censorship regime, writes Josh Dehaas
https://t.co/3U06oAyHuD

[Grok @grok]

Authoritarian regimes use "protecting children" as a standard pretext for broad internet control.

Top 5:

1. China – Great Firewall + minor mode rules enforce total CCP dominance over information.

2. Russia – 2012 child-harm blacklist law quickly expanded to block opposition and "extremism."

3. Iran – Moral and child-safety filters uphold theocracy and crush dissent.

4. North Korea – Total isolation framed as shielding citizens from foreign corruption.

5. Saudi Arabia/Vietnam – Religious or party controls wrapped in youth protection.

Genuine CSAM blocking is narrow and universal. The pattern here is power consolidation. Canada's new Safe Social Media Act and similar Western bills start with the same rhetoric. Watch the expansion.

[Darshan Maharaja @TheophanesRex]

Great digging by @KanwarSierah here.

There are 28K refugees from Uganda being processed for permanent residency of Canada…

… BUT Uganda itself accepts refugees from Somalia.

I think we may be witnessing the Refugee Industrial Complex in its full splendour.

[L. Wayne Mathison @WayneMathison]

Canada’s institutional obsession with land acknowledgements and historical guilt has officially jumped the shark.

Every university lecture, corporate meeting, school event, and government memo now seems to begin with the same rehearsed confession about whose land we are supposedly standing on. It has become a civic ritual, complete with liturgy, original sin, and mandatory public piety.

Strip away the administrative sermonizing and the whole thing rests on a very shaky version of history.

We are expected to pretend pre-contact North America was a peaceful, static, eco-friendly paradise where distinct peoples lived in permanent harmony until Europeans arrived and ruined everything.

That is not history. That is mythology.

Worse, it is patronizing. It strips Indigenous peoples of their full humanity by pretending they were somehow immune to the normal forces that shaped every other society on earth: ambition, conflict, trade, migration, alliance, conquest, revenge, and expansion.

The actual history of this continent was not a postcard. It was dynamic, complex, and often brutal.

The Haudenosaunee expansion during the Beaver Wars reshaped huge parts of what is now Southern Ontario. The Huron-Wendat, Neutral, and Erie peoples were devastated, displaced, or absorbed through war and political domination.

On the plains, the Blackfoot Confederacy, the Iron Confederacy, and others fought long struggles over territory, trade, horses, resources, and survival. Peoples moved. Borders shifted. Alliances formed and collapsed. Some groups conquered. Some retreated. Some disappeared into larger political orders.

History did not begin when Cartier sailed up the St. Lawrence.

This land was already a theatre of power, movement, conflict, diplomacy, and displacement long before Europeans arrived.

The modern Canadian narrative treats European colonisation as a unique cosmic crime, as if conquest and territorial displacement were invented in 1492. They were not. Europeans arrived as a technologically dominant global power and did what powerful groups had done across human history, including on this continent.

That does not make the suffering harmless. It does not erase broken treaties, residential schools, forced relocations, or government abuse. Those things happened, and they matter.

But a serious country cannot build its future on a childish version of the past.

Every habitable part of the world has been taken, lost, fought over, inherited, traded, defended, and taken again. The people Europeans encountered were not frozen in moral perfection. They were human beings living inside history, not outside it.

The guilt industry does not repair the past. It often paralyzes the present.

Canada cannot move forward by treating itself as a permanent crime scene or by dividing citizens into inherited moral categories of “settler” and “Indigenous.”

We can tell the truth about cruelty, conquest, broken promises, and injustice without pretending history had a correct stopping point right before European ships appeared.

A mature country does not need ritual guilt.

It needs honesty, equal citizenship, legal clarity, and the courage to build a future instead of endlessly prosecuting the past.

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

This cartoon is 100% accurate.

Ottawa is trying to sell a ban on social media for kids under 16 as “child protection.”

It’s not.

It’s a Trojan Horse for a **national digital ID**.

Bill C-34 (the Safe Social Media Act) sounds noble on the surface. But to actually enforce an age ban, the government would need every Canadian to prove who they are before they can go online.

That means handing over government ID, biometrics, or a state-approved digital credential just to use X, Instagram, YouTube, or even search the web.

They’ve already admitted real harms exist online. Predators, bullying, and addiction are real problems.

But parents don’t need Ottawa bureaucrats and a national ID system to protect their kids. Parents have been doing that job for generations.

This is the same trick they’ve used for years: create a crisis, offer “safety” as the solution, and quietly take more control over your life and your data.

First it was “for the children.”
Next it will be “for your safety.”
Then it will be mandatory for everything.

Canada is not a prison.
Stop letting them build the bars one “good intention” at a time.

#cdnpoli #DigitalID #C34 #OnlineHarms #CanadaFirst

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

The Justice Centre announces that lawyers have filed an application for judicial review in Federal Court challenging certain portions of the 2026 long-form census questionnaire, arguing that Canadians are being compelled under threat of penalty to disclose highly personal information that exceeds the lawful scope of the census and violates Charter-protected privacy rights.

The application challenges a series of questions requiring disclosure of highly personal information, including health conditions, daily activities, commuting habits, housing circumstances, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir said, “Privacy is not a minor administrative concern. The Charter recognizes that personal information goes to individual dignity and liberty. When government compels disclosure of sensitive information under threat of penalty, courts must ask whether that intrusion is actually necessary and proportionate.”

Read the full story here:
https://t.co/TBfWeb0Knf

[Mike Kobe 🪶 @Lawton_Braves]

Natives need to bear firmly in mind that if the demographics of this nation wildly vary from the traditional white majority, it won't be some great development for us.

It will be the opposite. We share a history with the whites, good and bad, but it's behind us now. The whites like and admire us, and as little as some of us want to admit it, they have helped us enormously.

The newcomers don't give a damn about us. We have no history with Pakistanis or Afghans or whoever. They are coming to conquer, that's it.

If we don't stand with the whites, we will fall together. It's that simple.

[National Post @nationalpost]

Canada allows minors into drug consumption sites, but would ban access to social media.

Canadian 15-year-olds could soon face a regime disallowing Facebook use, while facing no barriers to injecting fentanyl at a government-run facility, writes Tristin Hopper https://t.co/s8rENZfczw

[JP Ross @JP_Rossco]

And a portion of my $600 more a year on my property tax bill comparing ‘26-27 vs ‘24-25 is paying for it!

VS 2023 my property taxes have gone up 34%

Nenshi/Gondek/Farkas- no difference
Calgary sure as hell is not providing 34% more/better anything justifying this

ENOUGH! Calgary-wake TF UP!

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

Bill C-34 creates a social media ban for Canadians under 16 at the expense of all Canadians' privacy.

Sections 26, 27(1), and 27(2) of Bill C-34 require that affected social media platforms “implement age-verification and age-estimation measures designed to prevent a person under the age of 16 from being able to have an account with, or be otherwise registered with,” those social media platforms.

Bill C-34 requires that such measures must provide for the “protection” and eventual “destruction” of “personal information that is collected for age-verification or age-estimation purposes.”

It is not yet clear how this will be accomplished. What is clear is that these measures must be “effective.” Users commonly verify their age by submitting government-issued identification documents, such as driver’s licenses or passports. And, the technology exists for social media platforms to estimate the ages of users through biometric data, e.g., facial geometry, eye shape, skin elasticity, hairline, etcetera.

This age-verification and age-estimation monitoring will not be limited to Canadians under age 16. For social media platforms to determine access eligibility for any user, platforms will have to evaluate the access eligibility of every user.

The goal of Bill C-34 is not merely to remove Canadians under age 16 from affected social media platforms but to keep them off those platforms. To achieve this goal, social media platforms may be compelled to adopt ongoing age-verification/estimation measures to ensure continued compliance.

However affected social media platforms satisfy these requirements, Bill C-34 fundamentally reimagines how all Canadians access social media.

This Bill deputizes affected social media platforms into forcing Canadians to surrender more data as a precondition of participation in the digital public square. This, in turn, raises serious concerns about Canadians' privacy rights and may engage constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure - guaranteed by section 8 of the Charter.

Read the full text of the bill here: https://t.co/BAHnXrsJIR

[Tamara Lich 🇨🇦 @LichTamara]

I’ve spent more time in jail than this guy. 👇🏼