MJfromNS

I believe one should always leave something better than they find it. And, every individual deserves the right to freedom and the privacy to live their own life

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@Vikingr1776 Perfect advice!

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@Nickisbackbaby B. Not if it's genuine. The wolves in sheep's clothing and the whitewashed tombs will be exposed.

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@muheediva01 $350 for a 3 bedroom, entire upstairs of a house. Heat and light included. In 1991.

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@harperlee789 Don't have AC

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@Thevine_ntwk Because we have free will. He doesn't force anyone to acknowledge him or believe in him.

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@DavidFischer I vote yes. From my username I am clearly not American, but at this this point no idea is required to vote!

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@SpotJohnny11668 @DavidFischer Well said, great examples too.

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@DavidFischer D

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@DavidFischer C

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@DavidFischer D

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@DavidFischer F

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@Prairielily22 C

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@Concern70732755 @PierrePoilievre No. He might be a good choice for the federal Liberal leadership, but not for the CPC.

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

An Access to Information request filed by Blacklock’s Reporter (@mindingottawa) has uncovered a federal government strategy for monitoring, organizing, assessing and responding to online "misinformation" — including contemplated legal action against individual Canadians. The 35-page internal Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED) document outlines a system for tracking online narratives, assessing individual posts, and escalating responses. It also contemplates legal action against Canadians over social media commentary.

If you receive a government demand letter seeking the removal of your online content, submit a request for legal representation to the Justice Centre. We want to hear from you.

https://t.co/p0IFfLSalM

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@DavidFischer I use my ESV and the KJV.

[Tamara Lich 🇨🇦 @LichTamara]

They lied about crime, about attempted arson, about disrespecting the War Memorial, about desecrating the Terry Fox statue, about truckers being rapists, about Russian interference, about foreign funding, about middle class Canadians being right wing terrorists, they lied about invoking the Emergencies Act, and the former Finance Minister/Deputy PM giggled like a school girl when she announced she was freezing bank accounts and canceling insurance without due process, parliamentary oversight, or an order from a judge.

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@DavidFischer C

[Pierre Poilievre @PierrePoilievre]

In a recent YouTube video, Mark Carney had a confession to make: he will not meet Liberal emissions targets.

At least he was honest about that.

So, let's be honest about this: he pretends phasing out oil and gas was someone else's idea.

For a decade he was the worldwide CEO of the idea. He built his entire persona around Net Zero.

He claimed fossil-fuel-caused climate change was an "existential crisis", which in plain English means the world could end.

He was the UN's Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance where he recommended 65% of oil and gas should stay in the ground.

As Trudeau's Economic Advisor, he advised bigger and broader carbon taxes than even Trudeau had imposed.

He founded a banking alliance with the mandate to starve oil and gas of investment.

At Brookfield, his job was to use his political influence to get government handouts for his "green" investments (heat pumps, pricey "green" aviation fuel, etc.).

He made fortunes off an agenda that inflated costs and killed jobs for the working class around the world.

He didn't inherit this ideology. He built it. He milked it.

Now, he claims he changed his mind. Really? So, it’s no longer an existential crisis? Was he wrong for last decade?

If so, why go on hiking the industrial carbon tax by 500%?

Why has he not scrapped a single Trudeau-era anti-development law?

Why are 500 projects still waiting for federal approval?

Why has he not used his unprecedented powers in Bill C-5 to approve a single project?

Because it is all an illusion.

It was always about enriching the club. And it still is.

He will sound the alarm on new crises. The solution will be the same: heavy-handed, top-down crony capitalism—taxes, inflation, and debt for you, and handouts, bailouts, and carve-outs for the Liberal club. All to save us from the latest crisis.

The only way to change any of this is with a party that has been saying the same thing all along: get the government out of the way; free our businesses from all carbon taxes, red tape, and subsidies to unlock abundant, affordable energy. For Canada. For you.

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@lady_valor_07 Positive. Punishment was swift and done. No guilt trip required and no ambiguity over what was, and was not, accepted behaviour.

[MJfromNS @MJfromNS]

@ProLifeisProGod Keep looking and praying. An online church does not provide the personal fellowship Christians need.