Résistante dans l'âme, la Liberté pour étendard, surtout celle de penser.
Unité, Harmonie, Amour & Lumière sont mes armes préférées dans cette dimension.
@ClaireJardin1 Oui oui, petite Souris Mystique 👍
Est-ce que ça va mieux? Pas trop de dégâts chez toi après le gros orage de l'autre nuit ?
Plein d'Amour et de Lumière (bleue) 🙌🕊🙌🖖🌻🫶
🚨 Breaking News: Illuminati Member Leaks
The Full Committee of 300... The Shadow
Masters of Everything! 🚨
Friends, truth-seekers, awake minds... what if I told you that a single video from an alleged Illuminati insider just dropped the entire membership list of the Committee of 300, the ultra-secret cabal that supposedly runs presidents, banks, wars, media, economies, and your daily life?
This is not theoretical.
This is the raw list as of September 2016, straight from the leak. I’m posting EVERY name possible so you can research, connect dots, and wake up. Masters of all knowledge... Rothschilds, Rockefellers, royals, billionaires, politicians, bankers; they’re all here.
The Committee of 300: The Hidden Hand?
Here is the exhaustive roll call
(every single name visible in the leak):
- Craven, Sir John
- Roth, Jean-Pierre
- Crockett, Andrew
- Rothschild, Jacob - 4th Baron Rothschild
- Dadush, Uri
- Rubenstein, David
- D’Aloisio, Tony
- Rubin, Robert
- Darling, Alistair
- Ruspoli, Francesco - 10th Prince of Cerveteri
- Davies, Sir Howard
- Safra, Joseph
- Safra, Moises
- Sands, David
- Sands, Peter A.
- De Rothschild, Benjamin
- Sarkozy, Nicolas
- De Rothschild, David René James
- Sassoon, Isaac S.D.
- De Rothschild, Evelyn Robert
- Sassoon, James Meyer - Baron Sassoon
- De Rothschild, Leopold David
- Sawers, Sir Robert John
- Deiss, Joseph
- Scardino, Marjorie
- Deripaska, Oleg
- Schwab, Klaus
- Dobson, Michael
- Schwarzenberg, Karel
- Draghi, Mario
- Schwarzman, Stephen A.
- Du Plessis, Jan
- Shapiro, Sidney
- Dudley, William C.
- Sheinwald, Nigel
- Duisenberg, Wim
- Sigismund (Archduke) - Grand Duke of Tuscany
- Edward (Prince) - Duke of Kent
- Simeon of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
- Edward (The Prince) - Earl of Wessex
- Snowe, Olympia
- Elkann, John
- Sofia (Queen) of Spain
- Emanuele, Vittorio - Prince of Naples, Crown Prince of Italy
- Soros, George
- Fabrizio (Prince) - Massimo-Brancaccio
- Specter, Arlen
- Feldstein, Martin Stuart “Marty”
- Stern, Ernest
- Festing, Matthew
- Stevenson, Dennis - Baron Stevenson of Coddenham
- Fillon, François
- Steyer, Tom
- Fischer, Heinz
- Stiglitz, Joseph E.
- Fischer, Joseph Martin
- Strauss-Kahn, Dominique
- Fischer, Stanley
- Straw, Jack
- Fitzgerald, Niall
- Sutherland, Peter
- Franz, Duke of Bavaria
- Tanner, Mary
- Friedman, Mikhail
- Tedeschi, Ettore Gotti
- Friedrich, Georg - Prince of Prussia
- Thompson, Mark
- Thyssen, Dr. James A.
- Gates, Bill • Tietmeyer, Hans
- Geidt, Christopher
- Trichet, Jean-Claude
- Gethner, Timothy
- Tucker, Paul
- Gibson-Smith, Dr Chris
- Van Rompuy, Herman
- Gorbachov, Mikhail
- Vélez, Alvaro Uribe
- Gotlieb, Allan
- Verplaetse, Alfons Vicomte
- Green, Stephen
- Villiger, Kaspar
- Vladimirovna, Maria - Grand Duchess of Russia
- Greenspan, Alan
- Volcker, Paul
- Grosvenor, Gerald - 6th Duke of Westminster
- Von Habsburg, Otto
- Gurria, José Ángel
- Waddaulah, Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin
- Gustav, Carl XVI of Sweden
- Walker, Sir David Alan
- Hage, William
- Wallenberg, Jacob
- Hampton, Sir Philip Roy
- Walsh, John
- Hans-Adam II - Prince of Liechtenstein
- Warburg, Max
- Harold V Norway
- Weber, Axel Alfred
- Harper, Stephen
- Weill, Michael David
- Heisbourg, François
- Wellink, Nout
- Henri - Grand Duke of Luxembourg
- Whitman, Marina von Neumann
- Hildebrand, Philipp
- Willem-Alexander - Prince of Orange
- Hills, Carla Anderson
- William (Prince) of Wales
- Holbrooke, Richard
- Williams, Dr Rowan
- Williams, Shirley - Baroness Williams of Crosby
- Wilson, David - Baron Wilson of Tillyorn
- Ibragimov, Alijan
- Wolfensohn, James David
- Ingves, Stefan Nils Magnus
- Wolin, Neal S.
- Isaacson, Walter
- Woolf, Harry - Baron Woolf
- Jacobs, Kenneth M.
- Woolsey, R. James Jr.
- Julius, DeAnne
- Worcester, Sir Robert Milton
- Juncker, Jean-Claude
- Wu, Sarah
- Kenen, Peter
- Zoellick, Robert Bruce
- And hundreds more tied to the same web.
So tell me this...
- Why do so many Rothschilds, Sassoons, and Rockefellers appear together?
- How is Klaus Schwab connected to George Soros and Mario Draghi in the same list?
- What does it mean when Bill Gates, Alan Greenspan, and Jean-Claude Trichet sit alongside European kings, queens, and princes?
- Is this why wars start, economies crash, and policies never serve the people?
- Who really pulls the strings on the Federal Reserve, IMF, World Bank, WHO, and UN?
- Why are former heads of state like Nicolas Sarkozy, Mikhail Gorbachev, and Alvaro Uribe listed?
- Are we looking at the real “masters of the universe” who decide your money, food, energy, and future?
This leak claims the Committee of 300... founded supposedly in 1727 by British aristocracy... controls global finance, politics, media, military, and commerce with zero accountability.
Names like Prince Charles (now King), Queen Sofia, Grand Duke Henri, Duke of Westminster, Prince of Orange, and countless barons, viscounts, and billionaires keep showing up.
Wake-up call: If even 10% of this is real, everything you’ve been told is a scripted show.
Left, right, liberal, conservative... it’s all theater while the same bloodlines and insiders rotate power.
What do YOU think?
- Drop your research on any name below.
- Tag friends who need to see this.
- Comment which name shocks you most.
- Repost if you want the truth to spread like wildfire.
This is the red pill of all red pills.
Save this thread.
Research every name
and share what you find below.
Connect their current families.
Question everything.
Which of these names
stood out the most to you?
The names of your oppressors
have been laid bare.
Now what will you do with it?
Let me know what you think,
and SHARE THIS so that others may too!
And if you're not already following
@TrueOnX...
What the heck are you doing?!
Dear Christopher Nolan,
My name is Herod Priovolos and I want to tell you what #TheOdyssey truly means to me and to generations of Greeks who grew up with Homer’s story.
Homer did not sing of Odysseus simply to entertain us with ships, storms, gods and monsters. He told the story because he understood what war, time, distance and loss can do to the human soul.
Odysseus leaves Ithaca as a king, a husband and a father. He returns twenty years later alone, exhausted and disguised as a beggar, carrying the memory of every companion who never made it home.
The monsters are not merely creatures created for spectacle.
The Cyclops is power without justice. The Sirens are the beautiful voices that tempt a person to abandon their purpose. Circe represents the danger of losing our humanity. Calypso offers Odysseus immortality, but even eternal life becomes a prison when the price is forgetting his wife, his son, his homeland and his own identity.
And Ithaca is not merely an island.
Ithaca is the place that remembers you when the world no longer recognizes your face. It is the home that remains alive inside you after everything else has been taken away. It is Penelope growing older while she waits. It is Telemachus becoming a man without his father. It is Argos surviving long enough to recognize his master one final time.
Odysseus is not great simply because he defeats monsters. He is great because he is proud, frightened, wounded, clever, imperfect and deeply human. He loses his companions, his youth, his name and twenty years of his life, yet he refuses to forget who he is.
When he finally returns, Penelope does not recognize him through strength, glory or appearance. She tests him. Odysseus proves his identity by remembering the bed they built together around the roots of a living olive tree.
That is the heart of The Odyssey.
Not the battles. Not the ships. Not the monsters.
Two people standing before each other after twenty years, asking whether love, memory and identity can survive everything time has done to them.
That is why this poem has survived for almost 3,000 years. Every human being is trying to return to something: a home, a person, a lost part of themselves, or the life they had before the world changed them.
So use Homer’s seas, gods, heroes and monsters. But please understand what you are touching.
The Odyssey was never truly about how far a man could travel.
It was about how much the world could take from him before he stopped being himself, and whether, after losing almost everything, he could still find his way home.
@JJquiraque Bien dit @JJquiraque, je me reconnais complètement dans tes mots.
Du coup, on fait quoi de notre "carte d'électeur-qui-n'a-jamais-raté-un-scrutin-en-quarante-ans" en 2027 ?
A part @f_asselineau (qui risque encore une fois de subir les 🦫) tous sont des young leaders = systeme...
Défilé du 14 juillet 🇫🇷🥳
(Ceci est un contenu fictif purement parodique et caricatural avec une bonne dose de second degré et d'absurde, réalisé avec divers outils IA.)
Feat. Emmanuel Macron, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Mathilde Panot, Jean-Philippe Tanguy, Marine Le Pen, Julien Odoul, Manon Aubry, Hamza, Sébastien Delogu, Manuel Bompard, Eric Dupond-Moretti, Gérald Darmanin, Jean Lassalle, Jordan Bardella, Maria Carolina, Eric Zemmour, Sarah Knafo, Marine Tondelier, Yaël Braun-Pivet, François Hollande, Gérard Larcher, François Bayrou, Brigitte Macron, Didier Deschamps, Rachida Dati, Emmanuel Grégoire, Anne Hidalgo, Gabriel Attal, Prisca Thévenot.
#macron #14juillet #lepen #défilé #mélenchon
#Asselineau2027 face à Melenchon ou Bardella au deuxième tour gagnera.
Il ne nous reste plus qu’à voter massivement @f_asselineau au premier tour de la Présidentielle.
QU’ON SE LE DISE !!!
En 2027, le changement, ce sera le #frexit, la sortie de l’UE, de l’OTAN, de l’Euro….
LIBÉRONS LA FRANCE !
🇫🇷 𝗚𝗜𝗙𝗟𝗘 𝗠𝗔𝗚𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗟𝗘 𝗣𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗠𝗔𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗡 !
𝗟𝗔 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗗𝗜𝗧 𝗟𝗔 𝗣𝗥𝗘́𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗗'𝗨𝗡 𝗤𝗥 𝗖𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗣𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗟𝗘 𝟭𝟰 𝗝𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗘𝗧
Saisi en urgence pour un référé liberté par l’association Vigie Liberté, le Tribunal administratif de Paris a «enjoint au préfet de police de Paris, sans délai, de s’abstenir de prendre en considération la présentation ou pas d’un QR code nominatif» délivré par la présidence de la République après inscription sur son site internet, pour pouvoir accéder à tout un périmètre englobant l'avenue des Champs-Élysées et la Place de la Concorde.
Le Tribunal administratif a jugé que ce QR code nominatif «porte une atteinte grave et manifestement illégale à la liberté d’aller et de venir».
---------------
CONCLUSION
---------------
Comme tout le monde va donc pouvoir aller sur les Champs-Élysées, il n'est pas exclu que l'on assiste à des huées et des cris d'hostilité à l'apparition de Macron, de Starmer, de Zelensky et des soldats du régime néo-nazi ukrainien.
La "Coalition des volontaires" va-t-elle être sifflée devant les caméras du monde entier ?
============
https://t.co/kfonN3O2Zc
Vous n’allez pas aimer ce tweet mais il faut que vous compreniez
En France, il est constitutionnellement IMPOSSIBLE pour les citoyens d'imposer un référendum. Pas difficile. Impossible. Et ce verrou n'est pas un accident de l'histoire : c'est une pièce maîtresse du logiciel. 🔒
LE VERROU. La Constitution offre bien un outil, le « référendum d'initiative partagée » (art. 11). Regardez ses conditions. Il faut 185 parlementaires D'ABORD — sans eux, les citoyens n'ont même pas le droit de poser la question. Puis 4,87 MILLIONS de signatures en neuf mois. Puis, si le miracle se produit, il suffit au Parlement d'« examiner » le texte — sans même le voter — pour annuler le référendum. Le record en dix-huit ans d'existence : 1,09 million de signatures (ADP, 2019). Un quart du seuil. Le politologue Benjamin Morel a tout résumé : ce mécanisme a été « conçu pour ne jamais être utilisé ». 🗳️
LA SOUPAPE. À la place, on a donné au peuple des pétitions. Été 2025 : 2,1 millions de Français signent contre la loi Duplomb — l'une des plus grandes mobilisations citoyennes de l'histoire du pays. Résultat, sept mois plus tard : un débat SANS VOTE à l'Assemblée, dont la présidente prévient d'avance qu'il ne pourra rien changer à la loi. Deux millions de signatures = zéro effet juridique. La pétition française n'est pas un droit, c'est un défouloir homologué. 🪤
LE POISON. Et voici le pire : quand l'État verrouille la décision, il finit par verrouiller les consciences. Puisque rien n'aboutit jamais, les citoyens intègrent que rien ne PEUT aboutir. On ne se mobilise plus, on s'épuise. L'impuissance apprise est devenue une politique publique.
LA SORTIE. Elle n'est pas dans un homme providentiel — l'hyperprésidentialisation est précisément la maladie, pas le remède. Elle est dans la réécriture du logiciel républicain par l'intelligence collective : rendre au peuple le monopole de la question. Le mode d'emploi existe depuis 178 ans, à 400 km de Paris. 🇨🇭 En Suisse : 100 000 signatures = votation constitutionnelle obligatoire. 50 000 signatures = veto populaire sur toute loi fraîchement votée. Personne ne peut « classer sans suite ». Constitution de 1848 : zéro coup d'État, zéro effondrement de régime — pendant que la France, elle, changeait quatre fois de régime. La stabilité n'est pas le contraire de la démocratie directe. Elle en est le produit. 📜
En Suisse, le peuple écrit la question.
En France, il attend qu'on la lui pose. ⬇️
(Sources : Constitution, art. 11 ; Conseil constitutionnel ; Assemblée nationale, débat du 11 février 2026 ; Le Monde ; https://t.co/tUdZ74ON22 ; B. Morel)
Cette Française expatriée en Chine nous explique, exemples à l’appui, à quel point France Info désinforme son public et prend ensuite les Français pour des imbéciles
Alexis de Tocqueville – Redeeming the French:)
The Frenchman who understood America better than most Americans, and Europe better than it has ever understood itself.
1. In 1831, a young French aristocrat sails to America ostensibly to study the prison system. What he actually does is cross the civilizational divide – and spends nine months trying to understand why America works. Democracy in America is the result: the most penetrating analysis of the Anglo-Saxon tradition ever written, by someone who grew up in the other one.
2. What he sees in America is Locke and Smith and Burke implemented in practice. A society that built freedom from the bottom up — townships, voluntary associations, local institutions — rather than from the top down by enlightened decree. Americans, he observes, join together constantly, spontaneously, without waiting to be organized: to build a road, start a church, solve a local problem. This horizontal self-organization is the immune system of a free society. It is precisely what the French Enlightenment systematically destroyed by concentrating everything in the state.
3. But Tocqueville sees the danger from inside the success. Democracy has its own pathology – not the guillotine this time, something quieter and harder to resist: the tyranny of the majority, the slow flattening of excellence into mediocrity, the pressure to conform that needs no secret police because it operates through social disapproval alone, without a single revolutionary. This is the diagnosis nobody wanted to hear in 1835. It is an accurate description of 2026.
4. France keeps producing the individuals who see clearly. Montesquieu looked at England and understood what France was missing. Bastiat understood markets better than most Englishmen. Tocqueville understood America better than most Americans. Raymond Aron understood the Soviet threat while Sartre was still praising it. All of them largely ignored at home. All of them vindicated everywhere else.
5. The pattern is consistent: France produces the diagnostic genius, then ignores the diagnosis in favor of the next beautiful abstraction. Great individuals. Wrong civilizational operating system. The Platonic gravitational pull is too strong – the addiction to the elegant idea overrides the evidence of the actual result. Which is why the tradition that saved the world kept being built in Edinburgh and London and Philadelphia, not in Paris.
6. Tocqueville’s concept of civil society is his most practical contribution: the network of voluntary associations — churches, clubs, local governments, independent institutions — that stand between the individual and the state. This is the buffer that prevents soft despotism. Destroy it — by making people dependent on the state for everything, by atomizing individuals until they have no horizontal relationships left — and the citizen becomes what the state always wanted: alone, dependent, and grateful.
7. Soft despotism is Tocqueville’s most prophetic concept – and the most precise description of where the West currently stands. Not the guillotine. Something quieter: a power that doesn’t tyrannize but infantilizes, that covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, that reduces citizens to a herd of timid animals of which the government is the shepherd. It doesn’t break your will. It renders it unnecessary. He wrote this in 1835. He was describing the European Union, the administrative state, the therapeutic culture, the regulatory apparatus that decides what you eat, say, heat your home with, and think about your children’s education.
Soft despotism is what Rousseau looks like when he wins slowly – not through revolution but through form-filling. And Tocqueville’s warning, the one nobody wanted to hear, was this: it gets less soft with time. The infantilized citizen, stripped of civil society, dependent on the state, no longer knows how to resist. At that point the softness is no longer necessary…
It was the middle of the night, at about 1.30am, when Norway lost to England.
Yet thousands of Norwegians went to the Palace in Oslo and celebrated with one final Viking row.
They did not riot. They did not burn cars. They did not smash bus stops or glass windows of shops.
They smiled. The laughed. They saw the positive in their performance. They celebrated their heritage. They were proud of who they have been in the past and who they are today.
Norway might be out of the World Cup 2026 but they are in our hearts.
In the last three weeks, I think we have all fallen a little bit in love with Norwegians.