NE vs PHI
The play was under review for a possible red card to NE player 28 Mark-Anthony Kaye for Violent Conduct.
After further review a red card was issued to NE 28 Mark-Anthony Kaye for Violent Conduct.
VAN vs. LAFC
The goal awarded to LAFC was reviewed for a possible offside prior to the goal.
After further review, the goal was disallowed for LAFC due to an offside offense by player #99 (Denis Bouanga).
DAL vs. SEA
The penalty kick not awarded to SEA was reviewed for a foul committed by DAL #10 (Jesús Ferreira).
After further review, the decision to not award a penalty kick stands.
DAL vs. SEA
The penalty kick not awarded to DAL was reviewed for a foul committed by SEA #5 (Nouhou).
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to DAL for a foul by #5 of SEA.
PHI vs. NE
The penalty kick not awarded to PHI was reviewed for a possible foul by NE player #98 (Jacob Jackson).
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to PHI for a foul by player #98 of NE.
STL vs. SEA
The penalty kick awarded to STL was reviewed for a foul.
After further review, the penalty kick awarded to STL was overturned due to no foul.
VAN vs. LAFC
The penalty kick not awarded to VAN was reviewed for a foul.
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to VAN for a foul by #24 of LAFC (Ryan Hollingshead).
MIA vs. CLT
The penalty kick awarded to CLT is under review for a handball.
After further review, the penalty kick awarded to CLT is overturned due to no handball.
CHI vs. CLT
The penalty kick not awarded to CLT was reviewed for a foul committed by CHI #6 (Miguel Navarro).
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to CLT for a foul by #6 of CHI.
RSL vs. SKC
The play was reviewed for a possible red card to RSL #15 (Justen Glad) for DOGSO.
After further review, a red card was issued to #15 of RSL for DOGSO.
ATX vs. LAFC
The penalty kick not awarded to LAFC was reviewed for a foul committed by ATX #15 (Leo Väisänen).
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to LAFC for a foul by #15 of ATX.
VAN vs. STL
The goal awarded to VAN was reviewed for a possible offside prior to the goal by player #25 (Ryan Gauld).
After further review, the goal was disallowed for VAN due to an offside prior to the goal by VAN player #25.
VAN vs. STL
The penalty kick not awarded to VAN was reviewed for a possible foul committed by STL player #15 (Joshua Yaro).
After further review, the decision to not award a penalty kick stands.
CIN vs. NYRB
The penalty kick not awarded to CIN was reviewed for a possible handball.
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to CIN for a handling infraction by player #4 of NYRB (Andrés Reyes).
PHI vs. ATL
The penalty kick not awarded to ATL was reviewed for a possible handball committed by PHI player #9 (Julián Carranza).
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to ATL for a handling infraction by player #9 of PHI.
CLT vs. TOR
The goal awarded to CLT was reviewed for a possible offside prior to the goal by CLT #13 (Brandt Bronico).
After further review, the goal was disallowed for CLT due to an offside prior to the goal by CLT #13.
CLT vs. TOR
The penalty kick not awarded to CLT was reviewed for a possible foul by TOR #90 (Luka Gavran).
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to CLT for a foul by TOR #90.
VAN vs. DC
The penalty kick not awarded to VAN was reviewed for a foul.
After further review, a penalty kick was awarded to VAN for a foul by #7 of DC (Pedro Santos).
NSH vs. SEA
The goal awarded to SEA was review for a possible offside prior to the goal by #19 (Héber).
After further review, the goal was disallowed for SEA due to an offside prior to the goal by #19.
CLB vs. PHI
The penalty kick not awarded to PHI was reviewed for a handball committed by CLB #18 (Malte Amundsen).
After further review, the decision to not award a penalty kick stands.