Dr A Magadze

professional( PhD/LLB/PgDHSM and Many more). Health Professional/Legal/Researcher/ Leader/ Not a politician📌/Legal and health Advisor

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@HeartMattaz She is very right, DNA Tests Measure Probability, Not Absolute Identification. DNA paternity test evaluates genetic markers. It does not directly "name" or positively identify an individual it only compares a specific sample against a sample to calculate genetic compatibility.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@RealKoenaza Who ever was taking video is also same like bad person😡. I don’t condone abuse of women and worse ADULTS. Can someone open a case please if not yet arrested📌

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@AfricaisBlack Home Affairs is an administrative service provider rather than a representative entity. Its a government department that serves, manages, and provides services to all South Africans, but it does not "represent" citizens in the political, legal, or diplomatic sense

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@AfricaisBlack The court order does not grant automatic legal status or citizenship to illegal immigrants. It simply requires Home Affairs to allow them into the refugee application process. If an applicant's claim is reviewed found to be illegitimate their application will be rejected.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@HassanMcOjwang A man is not obligated to continue providing child support for a non-biological child once paternity is disproven, absent adoption.
The law does not enforce emotional loyalty or continued financial care; it separates legal duty from voluntary kindness. Find the real father

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@Ivyy_heree Neither of you is wrong for having human feelings, but you were not wrong for saying no, and he was wrong for attempting to guilt-trip you for https://t.co/XuQIiJBTro requires enthusiastic consent from both partners, and being tired is a completely valid reason to decline.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@a5cfor The wording contradicts itself! 
It says he was injured and transferred to a hospital, but then says it was too late and he passed away "on the spot" which means he died at the scene before even being moved. Which one is right?

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@AyeeNdeM While an 18-year-old can legally consent, South African law states that consent cannot be given if a person is incapacitated (e.g., heavily intoxicated or unconscious). The only proof must be that she was capacitated despite messages and agreement.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@sidisnoops And what has it done

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@SABCNews Legally: Irrelevance of Voluntary Action /Volition: even if a 16-year-old creates or sends explicit images voluntarily (without being coerced or asked), an adult receiving, keeping, or sharing those images is still in illegal possession of child sexual abuse material.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@joy_zelda Psychology says people often do this as a physical or psychological response to stress, scrutiny, and cognitive processing. It shows Expression of Helplessness or Resignation; Emotional Regulation & Self-Soothing; Cognitive Processing & Focus and Avoiding Gaze and Scrutiny.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@AyeeNdeM prosecution alleges Sibiya supplied her with alcohol at a strip club and hotel until she was passed out, and then raped her while she was incapacitated. Hence charges to prove

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@AyeeNdeM Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, a 16-year-old is legally a minor regarding grooming, explicit media, and adult authority dynamics.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@AyeeNdeM While an 18-year-old can legally consent, South African law states that consent cannot be given if a person is incapacitated (e.g., heavily intoxicated or unconscious).

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@AyeeNdeM Prosecutors allege Sibiya engaged in explicit electronic communications with her, possessed sexually explicit videos/photos, and solicited explicit content. Grooming charges apply regardless of whether the minor initiated contact or expressed interest

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@eliotchauke1 @cmolerysiyanda Proof beyond readonable doubt

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@cmolerysiyanda @eliotchauke1 Siya you are very correct. Law is about evidence and facts. How can then we say courts have not perform if we can show an evidence where such was ignored

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@eliotchauke1 @KeithParkin Very right. The same people we want to find if they ignored their work right. Question is “ are law enforcement people doing their work”. Remember issue of drugs bust at Krugersdorp which was led (police were involved

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@eliotchauke1 Examining incidents where PUTCO buses were targeted falls directly within the commission's scope to understand syndicate violence and cartel operations.📌

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@eliotchauke1 The commission's focus remains valid under the ToR only to the extent that it exposes criminality, violent extortion, or deliberate failure/complicity by police and justice officials.

[Dr A Magadze @MMagadze]

@eliotchauke1 Testimony and video evidence presented to the commissionsuch as the arson of PUTCO buses serve as concrete examples of violent criminal activity allegedly orchestrated by organized groups or syndicates.