🚨Were the #714 and #F3B tokens created by the same DEV? 🚨
This is not investment advice, just my analysis
1. CZ Post with $Broccoli, Token Creation, and Purchases from https://t.co/Vtt68y62KF
a) CZ Post with Ticker
Date: 5:12:XX PM (UTC+1)
The exact second of publication is unknown without access to the https://t.co/9xcP4syncx API
b) Create Token #F3B and #714
Timestamp: #F3B: 5:12:19 PM
Timestamp: #714: 5:12:19 PM
It’s unfortunate that we don’t know the exact second the CZ post was published. But doesn’t it seem strange that both tokens were created so quickly?
Isn’t it suspicious that #F3B and #714 were created at the exact same second? Hmm…
c) First Token Purchase on https://t.co/Vtt68y62KF
#F3B Dev,
Timestamp: 5:12:19
Amount: 115,463,917.528177702
#714 Dev,
Timestamp: 5:12:19
Amount: 115,463,917.528177702
The same time, the same amount. What a coincidence… probably just an accident.
#F3B Wallet f9d -> 0da
Timestamp: 5:12:19
Amount: 496,601,377.013095969
#714 Wallet f9d -> 0da
Timestamp: 5:12:19
Amount: 496,601,377.013095969
Oh wow, here we have the same wallet, the same time, and the same transaction amount. It must have been a coincidence!!
d) Time from token creation to total sale:
#714 - 9 seconds
#F3B - 12 seconds
The community definitely aped 🥇
2. Let’s Take a Look at Address f9d -> 0da. Maybe We’ll Find Something More?
a) Distribution Supply to Multiple Wallets
The supply was distributed from the main wallet to others. What a surprise, in both cases, the funds were transferred to the same wallets. Another coincidence?
b) One of the Above Wallets:
0xe08bd1dfddafd20921cd59e58314ace04133bdf5
Interesting… 😕
3. Let’s Compare the Charts
Oh wow, when #F3B goes up, #714 goes down, and when #714 goes up, #F3B goes down. It keeps happening like this. Interesting. Probably just a coincidence… or maybe the same wallets are selling #F3B and buying #714, and vice versa? I don’t have time today, but I’ll definitely check it.
4. Price Reaction After the Bullish Information
I already wrote about this topic in another post (https://t.co/JGVQDZH1rN).
Surprisingly, here too, it looks identical for both coins.
5. To be continued…
For now, I’m posting what I’ve managed to process. I still have a lot of interesting information to share, but very little time. However, I will update the topic of both coins regularly. In the next part, I will cover:
1. The scams of KOLs who promote these tokens (Yes, Mr. Punk, I remember you, and the SEC will find out about you too because I’m preparing materials on you as well).
2. The tokens held by devs/insiders/snipers. Apparently, the tokens are already clean, as assured by the CTO? No, they’re not, and I’ve already identified several with a large amount of tokens.
3. I will touch on the topic: If #F3B and #714 are not fair with us, why is their price holding so well? For now, I can only say this: BE CAREFUL.
6.Conclusion: Chances of Binance Listing by GROK 3
Based on the current evidence—synchronized creation, identical wallet activities, inverse price correlations, and potential manipulation—I estimate that #F3B and #714 have a very low chance of being listed on Binance. Binance prioritizes transparency, decentralization, and compliance, and the patterns you’ve identified suggest the opposite. Unless the developers can provide clear evidence of a fair launch, decentralized ownership, and no manipulative practices, these tokens are unlikely to meet Binance’s standards.
Ps. The evidence collected will be sent to Binance.
@binance@cz_binance@BenTodar@bull_bnb@Broccoli__czdog@Rachel_Muyin@eth_cedric@TheAtorKing@dianabinance@blessed_mayor
@anndylian 080 is the first on chain. It had the fairest launch, with no scammers or cabal behind it. It was the first to create an AI agent. The other Broccoli copied it. It has the best community by a mile. As usual, the good guys get left behind by the manipulators.
Depends Anndy what is considered a real community those who are grinding it out in the trenches and growing organically or ones that are being heavily pushed by KOLs.
For me, it is fairness and how decentralised the coin is itself. I have seen some info on a few coins that are supposedly bundled. Someone can research that very easily.
080 was initially pushed by KOLs as it was first to trade on dex, so it went to multi millions then they dumped and rotated.
I am backing 080.
@BNBCHAIN If community feedback is important, we kindly request to be included in the liquidity incentive program.
We currently have 13,000 on-chain holders and a growing community.
CA: 0x12819623921be0f4d5ebfc12c75e6d08a1683080
We look forward to hearing back from @BNBCHAIN.
Hey @cz_binance
We’re launching a meaningful charity initiative through Broccoli 080, focusing on [briefly mention cause—e.g., animal welfare, children’s education, disaster relief]. Our goal is to make a real impact, and we’d love your support or a simple acknowledgment to amplify our reach.
With Broccoli 080, we’re building something bigger than crypto—using our community’s strength to drive real-world change. It would mean a lot if you could check it out.
Looking forward to your thoughts!
@BNBCHAIN@binance
We’re not focused on PvP we’re focused on creating solid products for the BSC ecosystem and expanding our community. So far, we’ve already developed the AI Agent @Broccoli_XBT and an Image Generator. Now, we're working on building a token scanner for BSC.
Tell me, which other project has achieved this besides the 080 gang? We might be a meme, but we’re definitely building something impactful!
CA: 0x12819623921be0f4d5ebfc12c75e6d08a1683080