Walscott23

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@VibesFoot Et avec ce parcours, les arbitres sont encore de leur côté.

[Arielipillo @arielipillo]

✅ El mayor robo en la historia de la Champions League contra el Chelsea 2009

✅ El mayor robo de árbitros y la corrupción en La Liga (Negreira)

✅ El Mayor robo en la historia de las Copas Americas

✅ El mayor robo en la historia de los Mundiales

✅ El mayor robo de Balones de Oro

✅ El Mayor Robo en la historia de los The Best

¡Todas estas grandes escándalo están relacionados con un solo jugador!

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@LucaVaran Au moins, ils n'ont pas été agressés physiquement.

[Sporting Adeptos @Sporting_CPAdep]

💚 @Cristiano

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@YSLONIKA Quand une telle question est posée, il est généralement trop tard.

[Aya 🦉 @aya__R7]

اقسم بالله حقيقة أكثر صورة واقعية في التاريخ .

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@KRL_defi_ Ce personnage m'a vraiment marqué. Le jeu était parfait.

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@beri_grizou C'est forcément l'IA. Des adultes sérieux ne peuvent pas en arriver là.

[ياسين lfc @lfc009666]

إنفانتينو مع البرازيل في 3 من أصل 4 مباريات:

▪️ أمام المغرب: 🟥 تم التغاضي عن طرد أشرف حكيمي.
▪️ أمام إسكتلندا: تم إلغاء هدف صحيح لفينيسيوس.
▪️ أمام اليابان: 🟥 تم التغاضي عن طرد سانو، ولم تُحتسب ركلة جزاء بعد تدخل مايدا على مارتينيلي.

أما الأرجنتين وميسي:

▪️ 3 من أصل 3 مباريات شهدت "سرقات تحكيمية" أمام الجزائر، والنمسا، والأردن.

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@utdshows Quand Ancelotti commence a plaisanter sur un joueur, le processus est lancé. Endrick sera encore plus dangereux dans les prochains matchs.

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@AdriRM33 Léonardo de Vini, le peintre sur le terrain.

[REAL MIL GRAU @realmilgrauu]

Os cara fizeram uma edit com todas as decisões controversas que favoreceram a seleção da Argentina.

Somente nesta Copa do Mundo!

😳

[Troll Sports @trollsports]

🚨 All of Argentina's controversial calls in the World Cup so far 🤥

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@GunnerPuls Koller

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@LUDI_platform La correction n'est pas à la hauteur de l'impolitesse.

[Millie Marconi @MillieMarconnni]

A Chinese mathematician spent 7 years making sandwiches at Subway after his PhD, and at 58 solved a 150-year-old math problem nobody thought was solvable.

His name is Yitang Zhang. The problem is called the Twin Prime Conjecture.

He was born in Shanghai in 1955 and knew he wanted to spend his life on mathematics by the time he was nine years old. That year he found his own proof of the Pythagorean theorem. Nobody taught it to him. He just worked it out.

Then the Cultural Revolution arrived and took everything.

The Chinese government closed the schools. Zhang's father had political troubles with the Communist Party, so Zhang was sent to the countryside with his mother to work in the fields. He spent 10 years as a farm laborer. No high school. No classroom. No teacher.

He read math books in the fields when he could find them.

When the revolution ended, Zhang was 23. He sat the university entrance exam and got into Peking University, one of the most competitive mathematics programs in China. He finished his bachelor's degree, then a master's. The president of Peking University personally recommended him for a full scholarship at Purdue University in the United States.

He arrived at Purdue in 1985. He earned his PhD in 1991.

Then the second wall hit.

His relationship with his doctoral advisor collapsed. The advisor did not write him letters of recommendation. Without those letters, the academic job market was closed. Zhang applied. Nothing came back. He spent the years after his PhD working as an accountant, doing delivery work, sleeping in his car during the stretches when nothing else was available.

A friend eventually opened a Subway sandwich restaurant in Kentucky and offered him a job. Zhang took it. He kept the books and made sandwiches. A man with a PhD in mathematics from Purdue, working a Subway counter because the academic world had no place for him.

He did this for seven years.

He was finally hired as a lecturer at the University of New Hampshire in 1999. Not a professor. A lecturer. The lowest rung of the academic ladder, with no research funding, no graduate students, and no institutional support. He taught calculus to undergraduates and worked on mathematics alone in whatever time was left.

Most people would have stopped believing by then.

Zhang did not stop.

The Twin Prime Conjecture is one of the oldest unsolved problems in number theory. Twin primes are pairs of prime numbers separated by exactly two: 5 and 7, 17 and 19, 41 and 43. The conjecture predicts that these pairs never stop appearing no matter how far you go along the number line. Mathematicians had believed this for over 150 years. Nobody had been able to prove it.

The deeper version of the problem asks something slightly different. Not whether twin primes are infinite, but whether there is any finite gap between prime numbers that appears infinitely often. This is called the bounded gap problem. The best mathematicians in analytic number theory had been attacking it for decades. A landmark 2005 paper by three researchers came agonizingly close and still could not close it.

Zhang worked on it alone. No collaborators. No funding. No department seminars where he could road-test his ideas. He once said he would go to a friend's house and think in the garden for hours.

In 2012, during a visit to a friend's home in Colorado, something unlocked.

He submitted his paper to the Annals of Mathematics in April 2013. The Annals is the most prestigious mathematics journal in the world. Papers sit in review for months, sometimes years. The editors read Zhang's submission and immediately knew something was different. They sent it to the leading experts in analytic number theory for review.

It was accepted in three weeks.

The paper proved that there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers separated by a gap of less than 70 million. Not two. Not the twin prime gap specifically. But a finite gap. For the first time in history, someone had proved that prime numbers keep coming back together, that the universe of numbers never lets them drift apart forever.

Peter Sarnak, one of the most respected mathematicians at the Institute for Advanced Study, said: "He is not a fellow who had done much before. Nobody knew him. His result was spectacular."

Zhang was 58 years old.

Within a year he had the MacArthur Fellowship, the Cole Prize, the Rolf Schock Prize, and a full professorship at UC Santa Barbara. The man who spent seven years at Subway was now one of the most celebrated mathematicians alive.

He said in an interview: "I was not lucky. Maybe it is more important for a person to make himself known to the public. But that was not so easy for me."

He was not complaining. He was just being precise.

The mathematics establishment has a quiet belief that great work happens young. The Fields Medal cuts off at 40. Most mathematicians who change the field do it in their thirties. Zhang proved his most important theorem at 58, after a decade of farm labor, seven years of sandwiches, and a decade of teaching calculus to freshmen with no one watching.

He did not beat the deadline.

He proved there was no deadline to beat.

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@u2twi @bt3 Hors-sujet !

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@SeydinaOfficial Finalement, c'est aussi après le beau temps que vient la pluie. Le petit était orgueilleux avant le match et a pleuré après le match.

[Philosophy Of Physics @PhilosophyOfPhy]

In 1898, an Austrian physicist published a radical mathematical theory that claimed the entire universe was slowly, irreversibly ticking toward its own death.

The elite scientific establishment mocked him so relentlessly that he slipped into a deep depression and eventually took his own life.

Only a few years later, the world realized he was entirely right.

His name was Ludwig Boltzmann.

Today, his breakthrough formula is carved onto his tombstone in Vienna.

Yet outside of the physics community, almost no one understands the brutal, mind-bending philosophical truth he discovered about how our lives actually work.

In the late 19th century, physics was neat, orderly, and beautiful. Scientists believed that if you knew the exact position and velocity of every particle in the universe, you could predict the future perfectly.

The universe was a flawless clock.
Boltzmann looked at the world and realized that was an illusion.

He wanted to solve a deceptively simple riddle: Why does time only move forward? Why does a dropped coffee mug shatter into a hundred pieces, but a hundred scattered pieces never spontaneously jump back together to form a mug?

The laws of standard physics said it could happen. The math didn't forbid it.

So why didn't it?

Boltzmann realized the establishment was looking at the problem completely wrong. They were trying to track every single particle individually. It was an impossible formula.

Instead, Boltzmann decided to use probability and statistics. He stopped looking at individual atoms and started looking at the chaos of the crowd.

He invented a concept called Entropy, the mathematical measure of disorder.

His breakthrough was simple but devastating:

There is only one specific way for the atoms in your coffee mug to be perfectly arranged. But there are trillions of disordered ways for those same atoms to be scattered across the floor.

Things don’t break because the universe is malicious. They break because chaos is statistically overwhelming. Order is rare; disorder is infinite.

Boltzmann proved that the universe is constantly, inevitably moving from a state of low entropy (perfect order) to high entropy (maximum chaos). This cosmic slide toward disorder is the very reason time exists. The "arrow of time" is just the universe getting messier.

The professors of his day were furious. They hated his math because it relied on probability instead of certainty. They refused to believe that the fundamental laws of reality were governed by statistics.

But Boltzmann’s math laid the groundwork for quantum mechanics and explained the fate of the cosmos.

The philosophical lesson Boltzmann left behind is a cold, liberating truth for everyday life:
Order requires deliberate energy. Chaos is free.

Most people treat problems in their lives, a collapsing relationship, a chaotic career, a messy mind, as a sign of personal failure. They think they did something uniquely wrong.

But Boltzmann’s math proves that if you leave any system alone, it will naturally decay into chaos all by itself. Your room doesn't get messy because you are a bad person; it gets messy because the laws of physics dictate that there are infinitely more ways for your clothes to be on the floor than in the closet.

If you want to maintain order, sanity, or success in any area of your life, you cannot rely on things "just working out." The universe is actively trying to scramble your plans.

What is an area of your life right now that is sliding into chaos? Stop waiting for it to fix itself. Chaos is the default setting of the universe. What is the precise, deliberate energy you need to inject into that system today to fight back against the entropy?

[Walscott23 @MRegifere]

@EditionMerengue Il y a trop d'indices dans le message. Benzema connait le problème du Real.