promt: "cinematic romantic scene, couple walking through extremely shallow crystal clear ocean water at sunset, water perfectly calm and reflective so it looks like they are walking on water and clouds, camera placed very low at water level near their feet, gentle ripples around footsteps, sky reflections blending with clouds beneath them, dreamy atmosphere, soft golden light, realistic movement, photorealistic, shallow depth of field, tropical horizon in distance, 16:9" @elonmusk@xai@grok Censorship in Grok is fucking annoying. Perhaps censorship is necessary, although it is prohibited by many constitutions around the world, leaving the responsibility for what one does or does not do to the individual's conscience. And it is prohibited because when it exists and is controlled by some brainless and cowardly creature, it and it block the freedom of human self-realization. Moderation in Grok says it's blocking video creation? What's wrong with it?
@dvorahfr@nikitabier algorithms treat accounts that block badly, but how does he treat bots? it's terrible that we spend our attention and time not opening the door to a person who knocks on us with their hope in the future
You never want to hear obvious answers to the questions you ask! You sometimes claim that "black lives matter" and sometimes that "white lives matter," but the problem is that "LIVES MATTER," regardless of color, religion, social or cultural status. Crimes aren't committed by black or white people, but by criminals. And yet you keep trying to reinvent the wheel, riding a rocket ship straight to hell.
What's the reason for this stereotype about Russian girls being so beautiful? Well, you know, Swedish girls are also very beautiful. But perhaps beauty is about freedom. When people freely choose their partners, when they raise their children with love and respect for themselves and others. That's where beauty comes from. And we mustn't forget that external beauty without internal beauty is more likely to evoke sadness than affection.
Could those who stumbled here by chance write whether they knew that the abbreviation "USSR" is actually incorrect because it's "Soviet"—it carries meaning in the languages of the participating countries, but carries absolutely no semantic load, merely a label for Westerners. If you ask any Westerner what this word means, they might only point out that it's a proper noun referring to a regime. The question isn't whether it's good or bad. The funny thing is, this definition originated with the West, but rather with internal incompetence. In short, the true meaning of the meaningful translation is "Union of Council-Based Socialist Republics." Why am I interested in this topic? Well, I'm involved in ontological research, and it doesn't allow for ambiguous or vague names. For example, Euclidean geometry has a definition of a point, but I'm not satisfied with it, so I found the true definition of a point. And soon it will appear in the article: "The Mathematics of the Topology of the Universe." You can subscribe if you are interested and can understand what I wrote in this post. Thank you for your attention.
You guys have a strange way of measuring wealth. In the real world, things are much different. Ukraine, for example, is one of the countries that has rapidly shifted from a socially oriented to a capitalist-feudal one. Are you trying to claim that war alone is to blame for poverty? You're wrong. Foreign "investors" sponsored corruption to create monopolies, and the stolen money was used by other governments to spend. So, if a Ukrainian citizen comes to the EU and tries to buy a car, bringing perfectly legal money, you can bet they'll have a number of difficulties. For example, Ukrainian oligarchs freely buy up real estate and expensive trinkets without any problems. But the truth is that if life has gotten better in some places, you can be sure it's because life has gotten significantly worse in others, and that's capitalism.
It's an instrument, like a piano: if someone can't play it, then without someone who can, they'll never be able to appreciate how good it is. A blade in the hand can save lives, or it can do the opposite. But attributing to an instrument lacking motivation the properties inherent in those whose motivation is the only way to survive as an individual and a species is, at the very least, incorrect.
Both sound plausible in their style, but neither is real. It's a popular aesthetic meme, not accurate literary content.The image contains two fake quotes (misattributions).Kafka: “I ran from love because I knew it would destroy me.” → Not said by Kafka.
Dostoevsky: “I ran into love because I needed it to destroy who I used to be.” → Not said by Dostoevsky.
С тех пор как правит нами жалкий плут,
Закрыт засов и свищет кнут,
Жесток в своём предательстве паяц,
И это лишь один о нём абзац,
Он обещал- всё выполнить того чего желали сами мы,
Но ��равда эта выполнится может только честными руками
Теперь надеты кандалы, и на друг друга нападаем мы
А мы все ждем, когда за нас, исполнит кто-то то что сделать можем только сами.
И в дым вся превращается история
Глупцы кричат шуту: «Виват! Виват! Виктория!»
И славы, славы! требует толпа зевак
Поставив на себя, забытого Иисуса знак.
Creating expressive art with AI tools is still a brutal battle against glitches. With immense persistence, AI assistants leave their own marks on the creator's process, yet they might envy the stubbornness of those who still dismiss this as a mere toy or "fake" creativity.
If that is what you believe, then for you, it is so. I don't mind if you worship drug-addled idols with bloated egos; that is your choice—conscious or not. It is yours.
But I am free. Free from your recognition and the need for it. And if you like what I do—then watch and listen.