Mario

Joined for Pandemic resistance, stayed for the fun.

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@PAG_UM Duas belíssimas testemunhas da pandemia. Merecem o nosso respeito e admiração.

[Larry Sanger @lsanger]

"What evidence is there in the pdfs that Fauci's org funded the very creation of COVID-19?"

(Wow.)

The documents establish a strong circumstantial chain but do not contain a smoking-gun classified document proving the virus itself was created with Fauci's money. Here's what they do contain:

The funding pipeline is confirmed and undisputed: NIAID (Fauci's agency) granted money to EcoHealth Alliance, which subgranted roughly $600,000 over five years to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research. The documents also include EcoHealth's 2018 DARPA proposal (Project Defuse), which described work to be done at WIV that involved sequencing bat coronavirus spike proteins, reverse-engineering them, inserting them into other coronavirus backbones, and infecting humanized mice to test their capacity to cause SARS-like disease. DARPA rejected this proposal as too dangerous. But NIAID funded EcoHealth for bat coronavirus work that continued at WIV anyway. EcoHealth's own belated progress report — filed two years late, covering the critical 2018–2019 period — showed the NIH-approved experiments made genetically manipulated viruses more lethal in mice.

The strongest direct claim comes from the Murphy memo (a Washington Times article circulated within the IC), in which Marine Corps Maj. Joseph Murphy, working with DARPA, concluded that SARS-CoV-2 was an "American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus" produced through the EcoHealth/WIV program. He described it as a synthetic chimera that leaked before it could be attenuated, likely escaping in August 2019 because it had been aerosolized for delivery to bats in caves. But this is Murphy's analysis, not a confirmed IC finding — and the IC never adopted it.

What the classified material adds is not forensic proof of creation but evidence that the people in a position to investigate that question had every reason not to, and behaved accordingly. The newly declassified IC emails show the investigation was repeatedly redirected away from the implications of Fauci's funding role, which is arguably more damning than a single piece of lab evidence would be — it explains why such evidence was never officially found.

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@goncalo_nspinto @donocooperativa No poço infinito de "talento" do berloque certamente.

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@Rebecca21951651 @sciam How can I auto like every one of your posts??

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@northerness No need to qualify your statement. Parents are supposed to monitor their children, not the state.
Keep up the great work, I love your posts.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je vais partir du principe que tu es de bonne foi, parce que ton raisonnement est intuitif et que 90% des gens le partagent. Mais il repose sur trois erreurs factuelles, et ça vaut le coup de les regarder calmement.

Erreur 1 : la fortune d'Elon n'est pas un tas d'argent. C'est de la propriété d'usines, de fusées et de satellites. "Prendre la moitié de sa tune", concrètement, ça veut dire forcer la vente de la moitié de SpaceX et Tesla. L'argent ne sort pas d'un coffre, il sort des entreprises elles-mêmes, qui passent sous contrôle de fonds étrangers ou d'États. Tu ne redistribues pas du cash, tu démantèles un outil de production. C'est la différence entre récolter des pommes et découper le pommier.

Erreur 2 : "ça résout énormément de problèmes dans le monde". Cette expérience a déjà été tentée, en vrai. En 2021, le directeur du Programme Alimentaire Mondial de l'ONU a affirmé que 6 milliards de Musk pouvaient "résoudre la faim dans le monde". Réponse d'Elon : décrivez-moi exactement comment, comptabilité publique à l'appui, et je vends mes actions Tesla immédiatement. Le PAM a publié son plan. Verdict : ce n'était pas "résoudre la faim", c'était nourrir 42 millions de personnes pendant un an. Un an. Puis il faut re-payer, pour toujours. Le PAM avait d'ailleurs levé 8,4 milliards l'année précédente, et la faim était toujours là. Les ONG traitent les symptômes en boucle, jamais les causes, parce que leur financement dépend de l'existence du problème.

Erreur 3, la plus importante : tu cherches ce qui sort vraiment les gens de la pauvreté. Bonne nouvelle, on a la réponse, et elle est massive. En 1990, 36% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Plus d'un milliard de personnes sorties de la misère en 30 ans. Par quoi ? Pas par la charité ni par l'aide internationale (plus de 1 000 milliards versés à l'Afrique en 60 ans pour un résultat à peu près nul). Par l'ouverture des marchés, l'industrialisation, le commerce. La Chine seule a sorti 800 millions de personnes de la pauvreté en abandonnant le collectivisme, pas en taxant ses entrepreneurs.

Donc fais le calcul complet. Option A : tu confisques 500 milliards, tu finances quelques années de programmes, l'argent est consommé, et tu as détruit la machine qui produisait les fusées, les voitures électriques et l'internet des zones rurales. Option B : tu laisses le meilleur allocateur de capital de sa génération réinvestir 100% de sa fortune dans des industries qui baissent les coûts pour tout le monde et emploient des centaines de milliers de personnes. L'option A soulage ta morale pendant 18 mois. L'option B sort des populations entières de la pauvreté pour toujours.

La pauvreté ne se redistribue pas. Elle se résout par la création. C'est contre-intuitif, c'est frustrant, mais c'est ce que disent 200 ans de données.

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@goncalo_nspinto @salgueiro_luisa Mas como pode uma autarca bloquear a expansão de uma via nacional?

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@goncalo_nspinto Porquê este bloco central PS+PSD neste tema? Até parece que nos é imposto por uma entidade exterior....

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@goncalo_nspinto @joaomiranda O único problema é não termos um versão em português!

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@beegarc_ Nao entendo, foi apanhado? Porque nao resolveram o problema quando o apanharam?

[Sophie Corcoran @sophielouisecc]

I’m tired of two tier society where such religious ‘exemptions exist’ - if I can’t even have a bottle of water or my big bottle of shampoo

Certain people shouldn’t be able to carry a knife just because their religion says so.

https://t.co/d9YBsSDTlr

[Martin Kimber @MrMKimber]

Sir Trevor Phillips hits the nail on the head: “Prime minister, Kemi Badenoch, Nigel Farage, anyone else, please stop telling me how to feel… perhaps you should all focus on doing your jobs”

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@speraltalisboa Porque é pobre? Nao ha emprego?

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

People don't grasp the sheer speed and scale of Europe's decline.

This 👇 is an extraordinary number shared by Luis Vassy, director of Sciences Po (one of France's most famous schools) in this article: https://t.co/BQbkXb2kPl

He calculated that the EU is declining 3 times faster than the Qing dynasty at the height of China's century of humiliation.

Back then, it took China 50 years to drop from 30% of world GDP to 17%, whereas it took the EU just 17 years (from 2008 to 2025).

Insane 😢 And, sadly, given the current direction and the EU's systematically suicidal policy choices (latest example: https://t.co/6EYJgdXVVo), it's just the beginning...

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@GThrassaki @SU_57R Check out steam for ordinary drone games.

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@nfergus Still young to enlist then and go fight for Ukraine.

[Chris Rose @ArchRose90]

In my opinion, schools across the UK learning about Henry Nowak is far more important than watching Adolescence.

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@nosoyelnic @RnaudBertrand NATO's strategy?

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@goncalo_nspinto @pedroml Para os comunas so podemos comprar zundapp’s!

[Mario @MVAL2021]

@nmcteixeira @observadorpt Afinal foi um ataque Russo? Bot? Fdp? Parabens pelo nivel.