MYSTERY BOOK

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube
https://t.co/I3iBNFVgMg
This channel’s monetization was suspended for inauthentic content.
My channel does not contain mass-produced or repetitive content.
I sent an appeal video via DM, please check it.
I request a human review to resolve this immediately.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube
Please review this post and respond.
I still haven’t received any reply or acknowledgment.
If someone actually reviews this case, I believe it will be clear that this monetization suspension was unfair.
Please have a real person review my appeal and provide a response.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

please do not ignore this post.
I keep reposting this because you haven't provided any response.

@TeamYouTube
https://t.co/EE7lPJ6Ywc

You stated that my channel does not comply with the YouTube Partner Program policies, but that is simply not true. I will now explain why this is not the case, and I sincerely ask that a real person, not AI, review this carefully. If a human reviewer reads this, I am confident they will understand that this monetization suspension was unfair and reverse it. Explanation of the Channel The Mystery Book channel is a channel that turns “Napolitan horror stories” into videos and introduces them as mystery horror content. Each video is not created through a simple repetitive structure or an automated generation method, but is produced as an independent work based on its own individual story, worldbuilding, and directing concept. I personally request permission from the original authors in the horror story community one by one before using their works. The original authors are also pleased and proud that their creative works are being introduced and shared while being credited as writers. The visual materials used in video production are not AI-generated images or simple templates. I only use stock footage legally purchased from ENVATO through a paid monthly subscription. I do not use materials that violate copyright, and all videos are produced within the scope of legitimate licensing. In addition, this is not the type of content where multiple videos are mass uploaded every day using a program that automatically generates images and voice simply by entering a script. Each video requires manually searching for footage that matches the script, arranging scenes, and editing them according to the overall flow. Because of this process, each video takes a considerable amount of time to produce. Reasons for Objecting to the Review Team’s Decision (“Inauthentic Content”) I would like to clearly state that my channel’s content does not fall under any of the categories that the review team identified as “Inauthentic content.” I sincerely ask that each item below be reviewed carefully one by one. This is not mass-produced, duplicated, or template-based content. According to the guidelines, inauthentic content refers to content that “appears to have been made from a template, shows little difference between videos, or can be easily replicated at scale.” However, my channel’s content clearly does not fall under this category for the following reasons: There is no fixed template. Each video has a different story, worldbuilding, atmosphere, and directing concept. The videos are not created by repeatedly copying the same structure. This is not mass-produced content uploaded automatically several times a day. While all videos belong to the horror story genre, each video is completely independent content with different stories and settings. This does not fall under “content that simply reads text from websites or news feeds.” My channel is not content that simply reads text without the original author’s permission. I include the original source link in the description. This is secondary creative content produced with the consent of the original authors, not simple copying or reused content. This is not “repetitive content with little educational value, commentary, or differences between videos.” Even from the titles alone, every video has a different topic and worldbuilding setting. Viewers also continuously leave comments such as “This video feels different again” and “This video has a different atmosphere from the previous one.” These viewer reactions are objective evidence showing that each video clearly has its own individuality and distinction. This does not fall under “mass-produced content using similar templates across multiple videos.” As mentioned earlier, there is no fixed template. Different video sources are selected every time according to the script, and the same scenes or structures are not repeatedly reused. As a result, every video is completed with a completely different atmosphere and composition. This is not “image slideshow or scrolling text” content. I do not use slideshow-style videos made by simply applying effects to AI images. I directly purchase and use actual video clips. The videos are produced by searching for scenes that match the script and connecting them together. The guidelines also state under “content eligible for monetization” that content should “appeal to viewers and provide something interesting.” I believe entertainment and immersion are also legitimate values recognized by YouTube. The Napolitan mystery horror content I produce provides viewers with interest, immersion, and entertainment, and many viewers actually watch and respond to the videos for those reasons through comments. At the time my monetization was suspended for “inauthentic content,” there was no option for me to submit an appeal video. Other YouTubers who were suspended around the same time experienced the same issue, so this cannot simply be denied. However, I recently learned that creators who were suspended more recently are now able to submit appeal videos. Since I was unable to submit one at the time, I would like to share my appeal video with you now through X. https://t.co/SLJXkPKeSd sincerely ask that you calmly review each item in the guidelines once again. I firmly believe that my channel is content with clear individuality and creativity that aligns with the purpose of YouTube’s monetization policies. https://t.co/dzbF8o6bgh https://t.co/jl3u78szzV https://t.co/xOiLKRX65p are videos on my channel with high view counts. I believe these videos were able to achieve high view counts because, as stated in YouTube’s monetization policies, they appealed to viewers and provided interesting elements. If these videos had truly been mass-produced or repetitive content with little difference from other videos, it would have been difficult for viewers to continue watching them and generate such high view counts. I believe this is objective evidence from viewer response showing that my channel’s content is not simply repetitive or duplicated, but rather that each video has been chosen by viewers because of its different topics and directing style. The attached images include my posts on X, records showing that I have continuously tried to communicate with YouTube through DMs but only received copy-and-paste level responses, and comments from subscribers who sincerely hope that my channel’s monetization will be restored so I can continue creating content again. This is clear evidence that my content attracts viewers’ interest and provides engaging value to audiences. According to the policy, content is eligible for monetization if it appeals to viewers and provides something interesting, even when the intros and outros are similar as long as most of the content is different. Based on this, I respectfully request a re-review of this decision and the restoration of monetization eligibility. I sincerely ask that a real human reviewer carefully look at this post and review my case again. I truly hope you will reverse this monetization suspension. Please respond through a comment.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

This is YouTube’s officially stated YouTube channel monetization policies by Google.
Based on these policies, I explained why my channel does not fall under inauthentic content.If a real human reviews this instead of AI, you would not be able to say that my channel violates the YouTube Partner Program policies.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

please do not ignore this post.
I keep reposting this because you haven't provided any response.

@TeamYouTube
https://t.co/EE7lPJ6Ywc

You stated that my channel does not comply with the YouTube Partner Program policies, but that is simply not true. I will now explain why this is not the case, and I sincerely ask that a real person, not AI, review this carefully. If a human reviewer reads this, I am confident they will understand that this monetization suspension was unfair and reverse it. Explanation of the Channel The Mystery Book channel is a channel that turns “Napolitan horror stories” into videos and introduces them as mystery horror content. Each video is not created through a simple repetitive structure or an automated generation method, but is produced as an independent work based on its own individual story, worldbuilding, and directing concept. I personally request permission from the original authors in the horror story community one by one before using their works. The original authors are also pleased and proud that their creative works are being introduced and shared while being credited as writers. The visual materials used in video production are not AI-generated images or simple templates. I only use stock footage legally purchased from ENVATO through a paid monthly subscription. I do not use materials that violate copyright, and all videos are produced within the scope of legitimate licensing. In addition, this is not the type of content where multiple videos are mass uploaded every day using a program that automatically generates images and voice simply by entering a script. Each video requires manually searching for footage that matches the script, arranging scenes, and editing them according to the overall flow. Because of this process, each video takes a considerable amount of time to produce. Reasons for Objecting to the Review Team’s Decision (“Inauthentic Content”) I would like to clearly state that my channel’s content does not fall under any of the categories that the review team identified as “Inauthentic content.” I sincerely ask that each item below be reviewed carefully one by one. This is not mass-produced, duplicated, or template-based content. According to the guidelines, inauthentic content refers to content that “appears to have been made from a template, shows little difference between videos, or can be easily replicated at scale.” However, my channel’s content clearly does not fall under this category for the following reasons: There is no fixed template. Each video has a different story, worldbuilding, atmosphere, and directing concept. The videos are not created by repeatedly copying the same structure. This is not mass-produced content uploaded automatically several times a day. While all videos belong to the horror story genre, each video is completely independent content with different stories and settings. This does not fall under “content that simply reads text from websites or news feeds.” My channel is not content that simply reads text without the original author’s permission. I include the original source link in the description. This is secondary creative content produced with the consent of the original authors, not simple copying or reused content. This is not “repetitive content with little educational value, commentary, or differences between videos.” Even from the titles alone, every video has a different topic and worldbuilding setting. Viewers also continuously leave comments such as “This video feels different again” and “This video has a different atmosphere from the previous one.” These viewer reactions are objective evidence showing that each video clearly has its own individuality and distinction. This does not fall under “mass-produced content using similar templates across multiple videos.” As mentioned earlier, there is no fixed template. Different video sources are selected every time according to the script, and the same scenes or structures are not repeatedly reused. As a result, every video is completed with a completely different atmosphere and composition. This is not “image slideshow or scrolling text” content. I do not use slideshow-style videos made by simply applying effects to AI images. I directly purchase and use actual video clips. The videos are produced by searching for scenes that match the script and connecting them together. The guidelines also state under “content eligible for monetization” that content should “appeal to viewers and provide something interesting.” I believe entertainment and immersion are also legitimate values recognized by YouTube. The Napolitan mystery horror content I produce provides viewers with interest, immersion, and entertainment, and many viewers actually watch and respond to the videos for those reasons through comments. At the time my monetization was suspended for “inauthentic content,” there was no option for me to submit an appeal video. Other YouTubers who were suspended around the same time experienced the same issue, so this cannot simply be denied. However, I recently learned that creators who were suspended more recently are now able to submit appeal videos. Since I was unable to submit one at the time, I would like to share my appeal video with you now through X. https://t.co/SLJXkPKeSd sincerely ask that you calmly review each item in the guidelines once again. I firmly believe that my channel is content with clear individuality and creativity that aligns with the purpose of YouTube’s monetization policies. https://t.co/dzbF8o6bgh https://t.co/jl3u78szzV https://t.co/xOiLKRX65p are videos on my channel with high view counts. I believe these videos were able to achieve high view counts because, as stated in YouTube’s monetization policies, they appealed to viewers and provided interesting elements. If these videos had truly been mass-produced or repetitive content with little difference from other videos, it would have been difficult for viewers to continue watching them and generate such high view counts. I believe this is objective evidence from viewer response showing that my channel’s content is not simply repetitive or duplicated, but rather that each video has been chosen by viewers because of its different topics and directing style. The attached images include my posts on X, records showing that I have continuously tried to communicate with YouTube through DMs but only received copy-and-paste level responses, and comments from subscribers who sincerely hope that my channel’s monetization will be restored so I can continue creating content again. This is clear evidence that my content attracts viewers’ interest and provides engaging value to audiences. According to the policy, content is eligible for monetization if it appeals to viewers and provides something interesting, even when the intros and outros are similar as long as most of the content is different. Based on this, I respectfully request a re-review of this decision and the restoration of monetization eligibility. I sincerely ask that a real human reviewer carefully look at this post and review my case again. I truly hope you will reverse this monetization suspension. Please respond through a comment.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube Please leave a comment, and please make sure to watch the appeal video as well. You can also find comments from subscribers in the main post who sincerely hope that my channel’s monetization will be restored, so I kindly ask that you read those too.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

This is YouTube’s officially stated YouTube channel monetization policies by Google.
Based on these policies, I explained why my channel does not fall under inauthentic content.If a real human reviews this instead of AI, you would not be able to say that my channel violates the YouTube Partner Program policies.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube Please leave a comment, and please make sure to watch the appeal video as well. You can also find comments from subscribers in the main post who sincerely hope that my channel’s monetization will be restored, so I kindly ask that you read those too.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube Thank you for your response. Please leave the result of the review in a reply comment. I sincerely ask that you look at my channel and my viewers and make the right decision.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube @TeamYouTube There has still been no proper explanation or meaningful review regarding this issue. I respectfully ask for a direct review by an actual person, not a copy-and-paste reply. I am not asking for special treatment. Please stop ignoring this issue.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube
https://t.co/I3iBNFVgMg
This channel’s monetization was suspended for inauthentic content.
My channel does not contain mass-produced or repetitive content.
I sent an appeal video via DM, please check it.
I request a human review to resolve this immediately.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube @TeamYouTube 아직까지도 이 문제에 대해 제대로 된 설명이나 실질적인 검토가 이루어지지 않았습니다. 반복적인 복사·붙여넣기 답변이 아닌, 실제 담당자의 직접적인 검토를 부탁드립니다. 특별한 대우를 바라는 것이 아닙니다. 부디 더 이상 이 문제를 외면하지 말아 주세요.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube
https://t.co/I3iBNFVgMg
약 3개월이 되었음에도 아직까지 풀리지 않고 있습니다. 정책에 따르면 시청자의 관심을 끌고 흥미로운 요소를 제공, 동영상의 인트로와 아우트로는 동일하지만 콘텐츠의 대부분이 다른 경우수익창출이 가능하다고 명시 되어있습니다.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube 또한 많은 시청자들이 제 X 게시물에 댓글을 남기며 이번 정지 조치에 납득할 수 없다고 말하고, 지속적으로 해제를 요청하고 있습니다. 이는 제 콘텐츠가 시청자의 관심을 끌고 흥미로운 가치를 제공하고 있다는 분명한 반증입니다. 기계적인 답변이 아닌 직접 검토를 다시 한 번 요청드립니다.

[MYSTERY BOOK @MYSTERYBOO30675]

@TeamYouTube @TeamYouTube The deadline has already passed, so I can no longer submit another appeal in Studio. Since I can’t upload the appeal video there, please DM me and I will send the link.