❗️#TheObjective “La RFEF ocultó que Hacienda investigaba a #Negreira 16 meses antes del estallido del caso”
“La Agencia Tributaria reclamó en 2021 información sobre las incompatibilidades del exvicepresidente de los árbitros”
https://t.co/OF8cI2HfoL
El futuro que ofrece el socialismo: una sociedad de zombies lobotomizados adictos a la limosna estatal, encantados de ser tratados como los minisválidos mentales que son.
🚪 Cada vez que se usa la palabra gueto en cualquier parte del mundo, la deuda se remonta a esta puerta. A esta isla. A una decisión tomada en Venecia en 1516 que encerraba a los judíos dentro por la noche y les hizo pagar el salario de sus propios guardias.
El gueto de Venecia fue establecido el 29 de marzo de 1516, cuando la República de Venecia ordenó a su población judía vivir en una pequeña isla llamada Geto Nuovo, que significa la nueva fundición, un nombre derivado de la fundición de cobre que había operado previamente en el mismo sitio.
La palabra ghetto entró en todos los idiomas europeos desde ese único lugar. Por la noche la puerta estaba cerrada, las llaves en poder de los guardias cristianos cuyos salarios eran pagados por los propios judíos, un detalle que captura algo esencial sobre la particular crueldad del arreglo.
Debido a que la isla tenía límites geográficos fijos y la población no podía expandirse hacia el exterior, los edificios crecieron hacia arriba, convirtiéndose en algunas de las estructuras residenciales más altas del Renacimiento de Venecia, sus fachadas comprimidas siguen siendo visibles hoy en día como el registro físico de una población que estaba exprimida en el espacio más pequeño posible.
Los judíos que salían del gueto durante el día y estaban obligados a usar insignias o sombreros distintivos. Las puertas fueron finalmente abolidas por Napoleón en 1797 cuando conquistó Venecia, pero la arquitectura que crearon permanece.
El gueto todavía tiene una comunidad judía, sinagogas funcionales y un museo dentro de los mismos edificios que una vez albergaban a miles de personas en una fracción del espacio que necesitaban. ✡️
Una palabra que ahora describe todas las formas de segregación urbana en cualquier lugar de la tierra fue inventada en Venecia para describir lo que se les hizo a los judíos.
🚨 Reporter asks Ronaldinho which country he would support to win the FIFA World Cup apart from Brazil:
🎙️ Reporter:
“Ronaldinho, if Brazil don’t win the FIFA World Cup, who would you like to see become champions?”
🗣️ Ronaldinho:
“First of all, I hope Brazil wins it.
That’s my country and that will never change.
But if Brazil can’t do it, I’d probably choose Portugal.”
🎙️ Reporter:
“Why Portugal?”
🗣️ Ronaldinho:
“Because I think they have a fantastic generation of players and they have been competing at the highest level for many years.
They’ve won major trophies and they’ve built a very strong football culture.
I also think they’ve been very close to achieving something special on several occasions.”
🎙️ Reporter:
“Is Cristiano Ronaldo part of the reason?”
🗣️ Ronaldinho:
“Of course.
Cristiano is one of the greatest players football has ever seen.
What he has achieved throughout his career is incredible.
His dedication, discipline and consistency over so many years deserve enormous respect.
Every player understands how difficult it is to stay at the top for that long.
Cristiano has done it better than almost anyone.”
🎙️ Reporter:
“So you would like to see Ronaldo win the FIFA World Cup?”
🗣️ Ronaldinho:
“Yes.
Brazil comes first for me, always.
But if Brazil doesn’t win it, seeing Portugal lift the FIFA World Cup and Cristiano complete his football story on the biggest stage would be something very special for football.”
{@beINSPORTS_EN }
It feels increasingly obvious that FIFA will keep hydration breaks for future World Cups regardless of the weather.
FIFA loves money and adding in commercial breaks is the easiest way to guarantee higher media rights fees.
It's that simple.
🚨🇬🇧 | El candidato de la derecha libertaria británica, @RupertLowe10, estalló contra los farsantes del partido Reform UK por hacerse pasar por derechistas mientras admiten en sus filas a los responsables de aprobar el nefasto programa de trámites "exprés" para refugiados, mecanismo que utilizó el inmigrante sudanés que intentó decapitar a un hombre en Belfast.
"Es un escándalo muy decepcionante. Necesitamos escucharlos responder por qué lo hicieron. El establishment no protege nuestras fronteras... Es tiempo de una acción urgente y decisiva para cerrar las fronteras".
It is true that colonialism didn't "make Africa poor." But there is a case to be made for how it led to Africa's modern troubles. The story is not flattering to Africans or Europeans, so no one really tells it. But here's a stab at it.
Europeans - largely through private initiative only later legitimated by government - invaded an Africa that was primitive compared to Europe in the 17-19th centuries. Over a couple centuries it built up an economy - often having to overcome tribal resistance through brute force - and created totally artificial states that didn't take into account ethnic/tribal/linguistic/religious differences. Those states made Africa more prosperous, and this permitted a dramatic increase in the African population in the 20th century. But these states were fake. When the European powers abruptly withdrew in the 1950s-60s, it handed over a bureaucratic infrastructure that allowed new African rulers to have centralized power over these large states. The rulers used their power to reward their own families and tribes - at the expense of everyone else. The Europeans did not do this - at least to the same degree (they did use a divide and conquer strategy from time to time). This set the stage for a zero sum game among Africans, who were "citizens" of "states" that even now don't have any real meaning in the Western "nation state" sense. So you have brutal civil wars, a lack of coordination - and sometimes even genocide (Rwanda in 1994, and a low level version of it that lingers in the Congo even now).
Because these African states are totally dysfunctional, they need Western aid even to prop them up. NGOs and foreign aid provide the food and medicine that maintain the population, and keep up birth rates that are very high by modern standards - making the problem worse all the time. The freaking out over DOGE gutting USAID reflects this reality - many parts of Africa would depopulate and fall into disorder without Western help.
So the story really is that colonialism made Africa richer at the end of a gun, created political entities that make no sense, and permitted massive increases in the population. But the withdrawal of European leadership put Africans in charge of complex entities they couldn't rule effectively. And now they blame all their troubles on the Europeans, as if colonialism itself was one big theft. The reality is colonialism created wealth - the Europeans left - the Africans cannot maintain the same standard of living without them - and this is what they're complaining about.
El secretario de Guerra de Trump señala a España: «Sus playas están siendo invadidas». «Hoy distintas playas europeas son asaltadas por distintas ideologías peligrosas. Playas en España, Italia, Grecia y Bulgaria: llegan barcos y hombres. ¿Cuándo harán algo las capitales europeas contra esa invasión?». https://t.co/kPW3YfnMsn
DISGUSTING: Black woman in Tampa, Florida, has joined a disturbing trend of anti-white attacks, in which black individuals approach random white strangers, physically assault them, and falsely claim that they served on the jury that convicted Karmelo Anthony in his murder trial.
These racists need to face serious legal consequences. Without swift and visible enforcement of the law, this anti-white trend of random assaults and false accusations will continue to escalate. Authorities must stop it now before frustrated whites decide to take matters into their own hands.
Lauren Chen goes OFF on the hypocrisy of the "Black" community for acting like the victims after the brutal murder of Austin Metcalf 😳💯
Black woman: "What am I going to tell my kids?"
Lauren: "Maybe tell them to stop murdering people."
Somalis rank among the most welfare-dependent groups in the United States, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Finland, and Sweden.
Six countries. Same result. Every single time.
This is a pattern, and American taxpayers are paying for it.
81% of Somali immigrant households receive welfare. Even after being in the US for 10 years or longer, 78% are still on welfare. For native households, that number is 21%.
They aren’t living the American dream. They are getting free stuff. And we are all paying for it.
Moreover, mass Somali immigration is making our communities less safe. According to researchers writing in City Journal, Somali immigrant men have an incarceration rate more than twice that of men born in the United States.
An immigration system that endangers our own people is one that needs thorough reform.
Last week, my Task Force held its first hearing on Ohio’s Medicaid fraud scandal. I asked a Democrat State Senator one question:
“Has Somali immigration been good for Ohio?”
She said my question almost brought her to tears because of the hateful rhetoric.
Democrats don’t have an argument against the facts, so they attack the people who find them.
Luke Rosiak testified that 100% of the suspect Medicaid fraud companies he investigated had Somali, Bhutanese, or other African origin names. 100%.
The facts are clear: mass Somali immigration has been a catastrophic failure for American taxpayers, American communities, and American safety.
That is exactly why I introduced legislation to ban immigration from Somalia.
Violence is the iron life of law.
The West is collapsing because too many of its people live in a fantasy world, separated from reality.
They have been taught to believe civilization is maintained by sentiment rather than force. It is not. Nations that forget this do not become more humane. They become prey.
Every legal order, tax demand, police command, and prison sentence rests on force, or the credible threat of it. The state rests on it, and so does civilization itself. Civilization is the organization of force into order. Strip that away, and “law” becomes nothing but a suggestion.
This is the great fiction of liberal society. It teaches people to imagine politics as a seminar and government as a neutral referee, when in reality law is never floating above human conflict. Law is made by those who possess power, and political power is organized force. It is interpreted by those who serve that power and enforced by those willing to act on its behalf.
That does not mean violence is always wise or useful. Quite the opposite. Under present conditions, it is usually futile. The Regime possesses overwhelming force, and even more importantly, it possesses the ability to define the meaning of force. Its violence is called “order.” Your resistance is called “extremism.”
This is why people must learn to distinguish between violence the system fears and violence the system permits.
The current protests in Belfast, for example, or the riots in American cities during the Summer of Floyd, were not allowed to unfold simply because the state lacked the will to stop them. They were allowed because they served a purpose.
Has America, for example, become more free since the summer of 2020? Has the state become less tyrannical, less censorious, less aggressive, and less eager to treat its own people as enemies?
The answer is obvious to anyone willing to see it.
That is, in fact, the very point. Violence does solve problems, just not necessarily yours. It solves the problems of whoever has the power to define it and instrumentalize its consequences for its own purposes.
That is why the childish slogan “you can’t solve problems with violence” is so absurd.
History was not built by debate-club etiquette. States are born through violence, preserved through violence, and destroyed when their monopoly on violence fails.
The serious man does not worship violence, least of all if he has known it firsthand. Nor does he pretend it does not exist. He understands it as the foundation beneath politics, then acts with discipline and realism in a world ruled by power.
The question is not whether violence solves problems. It does. The question is who benefits from it, and whether you are acting with judgment or walking into a trap set by your enemies.