Every article from The Free Press is like “Hasan Piker Says He ‘Has Hopes’ For ‘Rape City’” and you read the article and it’s like “Hasan Piker recently said he hopes Israel will close Rape City, the area they’ve created where they somberly rape people for necessary reasons”
Neera Tanden helped run the campaign that insisted Obama couldn’t win a national election, and now she pretends that didn’t happen and assumes nobody can do a Google search
Hi @NYTimesPR, thanks for responding. Appreciate it. I'm a subscriber and I think some of your reporters do some great reporting.
Just to respond to your response to my post:
1) There were no facts "misstated" by me. You cited three examples in response. Only one of them was about specific *named* GOP House members (and it wasn't from "yesterday", it was from a year ago.) So I stand by my post.
2) As others have pointed out already, none of the 3 articles you cited have the names of any GOP individuals in the titles ("Right-Wing Republicans" "a Kansas Republican" "G.O.P. Fingerprints"), in comparison to your original "Who is Darializa" takedown piece. Where is your "Who is Brandon Gill" or "Who is Keith Self" or "Who Is Randy Fine" or "Who Is Mary Miller" critical profile pieces? How about "Who is Tom Emmer," given the GOP House Majority Whip just a few days ago spewed racist crap about Somalis? And where are the Peter Baker tweets summarizing *their* most controversial claims?
3) This isn't a new criticism. Many have made it against your paper for many years; that you go harder on the left than the right, that you even occasionally whitewash the far right. Remember when you had to do a public response in 2017 to a NYT profile that went super soft on a... Nazi? https://t.co/IF6DhTwcrp. Remember when you guys did a softball piece about a far-right, Islamophobic Trump aide's love for cooking? https://t.co/dp0Sf9PQg9.
Oh, and dare I ask: where are the fawning 'Trump voters' in diners' equivalent pieces for DSA members in NYC bodegas? Isn't it time?
4) Finally, that your response to my post was to proudly say you guys at the Times have "been documenting the increasingly extreme viewpoints on both sides of the political spectrum" kinda makes my point for me. One side's extreme wants universal healthcare and an end to genocide. The other side's extreme says Somalis are "garbage" and wants "remigration", mass deportations and white supremacy.
But, hey, "Both sides!"
If we are going to call the cost of public services a “loss,” then Canadian police forces lost $20 billion last year while delivering no birthday presents and also killing a lot of people.
You can't do that unless you nationalize the oil industry.
We export 4 million barrels a day of raw bitumen to the US and China and then pay global market rates domestically.
If we nationalize we decouple from the crude benchmark like Norway and can spend profits on healthcare
Butler was staged
Charlie Kirk was an inside job
‘24 election was hacked by Elon
Epstein was swapped out
Trump worked w/ Russia in ‘16
Iran has no nukes
Israel is a terrorist state
Trump raped 13 yr old girls
The “peacekeeping” myth is Canada’s greatest export. Not weapons, not mining, not banking. Narrative. The idea that this polite little empire is just out here keeping the world calm while it quietly backs occupation, sanctions, and siege.
People who say you should criticize AOC less because there are way worse members of congress act like she's just passively sitting there being a mediocre lawmaker. She's not. She's actively anchoring the leftmost edge of the Overton window of US politics to militarism, capitalism, colonialism, and genocide. She's actively stopping American politics from moving any further left than the nightmare we see before us.
Leftists shouldn't hate AOC less than the politicians to her right, they should hate her much more. It isn't Mike Johnson's responsibility to move the US government to the left, and it's not Nancy Pelosi's job. It's hers. That's what she was elected to do. That's what she framed the goals of her entire political career as being. And she's taking her stand firmly bracing against any leftward movement from America's genocidal, warmongering, unjust, exploitative, tyrannical status quo.
And that's what she was put there to do. Her real job is to say "thus far and no further" to the leftmost end of the political spectrum of the world's most powerful and destructive government. That's the Democratic Party's job in general, and it's the job of media-savvy progressive Democrats in particular. They are there to provide as little resistance as possible when US politics are shoved toward more genocidal, militaristic, oligarchic, capitalist, imperialist abuses, and to provide as much inertia as possible to any movement in the opposite direction.
That's why people who seek leftward movement in the US political machine see AOC as one of their main enemies. It's for the exact same reason you'd see someone actively blocking the fire exit as your enemy when trying to escape from a burning building.