Craig Wright is Satoshi. He proved it again and again through the whitepaper, the code, and the protocol he restored in BSV. The courts and the haters can say whatever they want the evidence is in the blockchain itself, Respect to the real creator!
CRAIG WRIGHT IS SATOSHI.
He restored the original protocol in BSV EXACTLY as written in the WHITEPAPER no SegWit cancer and fees so low they’re basically free
BSV is the only chain still following the Whitepaper.
BTC with SegWit is a CORRUPTED fork that betrayed Satoshi’s vision.
They literally changed the rules of Bitcoin to protect their small blocks agenda and turned Bitcoin into a slow, expensive settlement layer for rich people.
This was the biggest hijack in crypto history.
BTC has no bottom!!!!
It’s a DYING digital gold settlement layer kept alive by bagholders like Saylor.
The whole chain is fundamentally broken.
While you’re still praying for BTC “bottoms” and chart patterns on a dead chain BSV is already doing what @CsTominaga actually designed.
@AshCrypto Saylor isn’t a genius, he’s the biggest bagholder of Blockstream’s scam.
BSV doesn’t need your institutional cope.
Real utility is already live. Real scaling is already here.
Keep buying the hijacked version.
The last laugh will be ours.
CRAIG WRIGHT IS SATOSHI.
Again: you have not tied a single key to Satoshi.
You have asserted a sequence. You have asserted a “single actor.” You have asserted “corresponding keys.” None of that is evidence.
Show the link. Show one statement, one signed message, one email, one forum post, one direct attestation where Satoshi identifies a key or address as his.
The blockchain records key control. It does not record identity. It does not say “Satoshi.”
You are not proving a link. You are assuming one. That is the entire defect.
My dear fellow, one does not gift what one has first presumed the right to seize. You take a set of coins—on the strength of a rather imaginative theory attributed to Mr. Lerner—and proceed as though conjecture were ownership. The difficulty, of course, is that speculation is not provenance, and assumption is not authority.
Dress it up as generosity if you must, but appropriation does not become noble merely by being renamed. In the end, all you have accomplished is to demonstrate a most curious achievement: the construction of a neatly centralised arbiter, cloaked in the language of decentralisation.
THESE CLOWNS SPENT FOUR years making a movie just to AVOID the obvious truth staring them in the face.
THE REAL SATOSHI is Craig Wright
Unlike the fairy tale "disappeared geniuses" they love to romanticize, Craig is a genius under constant pursuit.
This documentary pure cope
@litecoin pathetic 2011 copy paste with almost zero hashrate, dead blocks, and a founder who literally dumped ALL his bags at the absolute top like a textbook shitcoiner.
@BitcoinNews these IDIOTS interview widows and push their delusional "two people" theory, the real creator is here fighting for the original vision.
The real Satoshi is Craig Wright the absolute genius who created Bitcoin, wrote the whitepaper, and designed the original protocol.
@BitcoinNews Unlike the fairy tale "disappeared geniuses" they love to romanticize
Craig has been hunted, smeared, sued, and attacked without a single second of break for over 15 years by Blockstream, Coinbase, the Core mafia, and the entire BTC cult.
THESE CLOWNS SPENT FOUR years making a movie just to AVOID the obvious truth staring them in the face.
THE REAL SATOSHI is Craig Wright
Unlike the fairy tale "disappeared geniuses" they love to romanticize, Craig is a genius under constant pursuit.
This documentary pure cope
📽️ "Finding Satoshi" claims to solve the Satoshi mystery after a 4-year investigation.
The upcoming documentary, concludes #Bitcoin was created by two people:
Hal Finney writing the code while Len Sassaman authored the white paper, featuring interviews with both widows.
@BitcoinMagazine@TheBitcoinConf LMFAO!!!
They’ll spend three days hyping the hijacked 1MB SegWit shitcoin, talking about “number go up”, ETFs, and “digital gold” while completely ignoring the real vision.
none of that exists on their crippled chain.
We'll keep building the real Bitcoin on BSV
Craig was right.
Let me be precise about what decentralization actually entails. When you see arguments around BTC—claims that it should only be used for cash, that certain transactions are “spam,” or that particular uses are invalid—that is not neutrality. That is control.
The moment a group can assert how the system must be used, define acceptable behaviour, or constrain implementation, you are no longer looking at an open system. You are looking at a controlled one.
A system is not permissionless if participants can be told they are using it “wrong,” or if their activity can be curtailed based on subjective rules. True decentralization means there is no authority capable of imposing those constraints—no gatekeeper dictating form, function, or purpose.
You were told Ethereum would deliver fully decentralized applications. Others have made similar claims. The difference here is that Bitcoin already has the capacity to do it, and BSV has addressed the practical constraints—scaling, cost, and the ability to run these systems at real-world levels.
Over the next 12 months, that stops being theoretical. You’ll start to see these systems actually operating—peer-to-peer applications between individuals that scale properly, without operators, without central points of control. Systems that function as they were originally envisioned.
At that point, it becomes self-evident.
And none of this requires permission.
https://t.co/pKEbeDzx64 is approaching 100 million transactions, with the $BSV community demonstrating the power of the Bitcoin protocol.
It will likely reach this milestone by the end of the weekend.
#BSV#Bitcoin#TxBlaster
@jeftovic There is zero record of Satoshi having 1.12 million coins and no way to verify this crap publically.
Any claim stating SN has... X. is a lie.