Greetings, fashion enthusiasts! I'm Debs of Maevedebsapparel a skilled tailor with a passion for making clothes that fit like a dream. From classic designs to trendy ensembles, I'm here to elevate your style game this festive season. Join the fashion revolution ✂️♥️🧵
#Vendorspot
Those of you that have your page subscription activated, please could you check for me from your dashboard?
Click on the cycled text to see if it will reveal your earnings.
It has not been opening for me for some days now.
Thank you 🙏.
Alright, let's move on.
I want to particularly tell this to you young men.
Agreed, men & women cheat.
But you see any lady that knows that you know that she's cheating with you?
Please do not marry her.
If you do not understand, let me break it down a bit.
Sandra's boyfriend is Tunde.
But Sandra is cheating with Okechuckwu.
And Okechuckwu knows that Sandra is dating Tunde.
Then Sandra later breaks up with Tunde.
And Okechuckwu starts to date Sandra.
Okechuckwu is the loser and Tunde is the winner.
Except Okechuckwu does not marry Sandra.
It's better for Tunde to marry Sandra, if Tunde is not aware that Sandra was cheating on him with Okechuckwu.
Sandra will respect Tunde because is a blind husband.
And it's highly possible that Sandra may not cheat on Tunde as his wife.
But if Okechuckwu marries Sandra, then Sandra will maltreat Okechuckwu, cheat on him & would not feel any remorse.
Because Okechuckwu already knew that Sandra was a cheat, & he could not walk away and be a man.
And the probability that Sandra would go back to Tunde to cheat on Okechuckwu is high.
Women's fidelity is their shield.
It's their bargaining chip & bragging right in both relationships and marriage.
Any man that refuses to walk away when she loses that shield, would lose his respect.
Because she expects you to walk away.
If you refuse to walk away, she'll become dangerous, despise you, & become bold in challenging you.
End.
@jon_d_doe Good morning, Agba
Also avoid telling him:
comparisons between him and your exes
private family issues that don’t concern him
how many men are currently interested in you
how easily you can walk away
If you see onions with these black things on them.
It isn't just dirt. It is a dangerous FUNGI.
The Fungi is called ASPERGILLUS NIGER.
This Fungi produces a dangerous chemical and if inhaled by people with low immune response , Diabetes, asthma or with lung diseases , etc they can have a disease called ASPERGILLOSIS.
Studies have shown that some species of the Aspergillus Niger can produce toxins that can damage the kidneys.
It's role in cancer is still being studied.
See these black spots on Onions.
Be careful
Store your onions properly
CAN PREGNANT WOMEN SQUAT TO HAVE A VAGINAL DELIVERY?
WHEN GRAVITY MEETS GUIDELINES AND WHY CHILDBIRTH IS NOT A ROMANCE NOVEL
Ify, let me answer you as a gynae doctor, and I will do it calmly, and clearly, and without romance, because childbirth is already dramatic enough without our adding fiction.
Yes, squatting during childbirth is not new. It is old. Very old. Older than hospitals, and older than obstetric beds, and certainly older than ring lights and viral videos. Before medicine had machines, women used gravity. They squatted, and knelt, and sat on wooden stools while medieval midwives watched closely and prayed fervently. So what you saw online is not innovation, it is archaeology dressed as empowerment.
And yet this is where truth must interrupt nostalgia.
According to RCOG guidance, upright positions in labour including squatting can be beneficial, and this is important, when appropriately chosen. Gravity may help the baby descend, and labour may shorten, and some women may avoid assisted delivery. These are not myths. They are physiology.
But medicine does not stop at 'can' Medicine asks, for whom, and when, and at what cost.
RCOG is very clear, and clarity matters here: Women should be encouraged to adopt any position they find comfortable, provided there are no medical or obstetric contraindications.
And that sentence modest, restrained, almost shy is where social media loses interest.
Because squatting, Ify, is not universally safe. Not for every woman. Not for every labour. Not for every baby. And certainly not for every moment.
There are labours where squatting is unwise like when the baby is distressed and seconds matter, and when an epidural has taken balance and control, and when a severe tear is waiting quietly at the perineum, and when the baby is large or poorly positioned, and when shoulder dystocia is anticipated, and when haemorrhage is a possibility that demands control, and when continuous monitoring or urgent intervention may be needed. In these moments, romance is dangerous.
You see, modern obstetrics is not impressed by how ancestral something feels. It is loyal only to context.
What unsettles us as doctors is not squatting itself. It is the way it is sold as more natural, and therefore superior, as always safer, and therefore unquestionable; as better than hospital birth, and therefore virtuous. This is a false holiness.
Medieval women birthed upright, yes and they also died in numbers we would now find obscene. Progress was not abandoning physiology, it was refusing preventable death. We kept what worked, and we discarded what killed women quietly.
So here is the balanced truth, and balance is the hardest thing to sell online:
Squatting can be used. It should be supported. It must be supervised. And it should always be individualised, never prescribed by an algorithm.
The safest birth position is not the most ancient one. It is the one chosen with a skilled birth attendant, in response to this woman, this baby, this labour.
So Ify, do not fear squatting, but do not worship it either. Medicine does not reject old wisdom, it interrogates it, and refines it, and insists that women survive it.
And if you ever find yourself considering an upright position in labour, ask not whether it is natural. Ask whether it is safe, for you, right now, in this moment.
That is where medicine stands. Firmly. Responsibly. And always, always on the side of women staying alive.
Each time I come here to talk about the dire consequences of yahoo and criminality, some of you will be asking me stupid questions like..
"what of our politicians?"
As if politicians have not been stealing even before Nigeria had her independence.
Stolen money in the hands of small boys, is a very dangerous weapon to themselves, & to the society at large.
They'll destroy your little sisters, daughters and even some of your wives.
If you sit down & critically analyze these ills, you'll blame politicians no doubt, but you'll stop using them as an excuse.
Some of us electorates, are even the ones that encourage these politicians to steal.
If they don't steal to share around, they're not guaranteed to win another election.
We have encouraged stealing without shame or remorse, so much in our country.
And the resultant effect is what we are seeing today.
As parents, you may do our best to give your kids the godly or right upbringing.
But the society is by far more powerful, & they can ruin your kids for you.
That's for parents that are doing their best.
However, this menace will not be so widespread, if many parents did not endorse it.
Especially mothers.
So before you use the politicians as a comfortable excuse, look at your father and mother first.
Do they know that you're a thief?
What are they saying or doing about it?
End.
Parents think height is genetics alone.
But a child’s bedtime is one of the most powerful determinants of growth.
Blue light from screens shuts down melatonin, the hormone that signals the body to sleep deeply.
And deep sleep is when growth hormone is released.
When melatonin dies, growth hormone never rises.
The body cannot grow in half-sleep, in overstimulation, or in neurological confusion caused by late-night cartoons and glowing tablets.
This is why many children today are shorter than their potential.
Their hormones never get darkness, silence, or rest.
Screens are stealing inches from them.
If you want a tall child, protect their night (bedtime).
The body grows when the world goes dark.
Don't forget to reach out for a diet plan. Share and tag your friends.
BIG BABY (MACROSOMIA). WHEN A BABY ARRIVES TOO BIG AND BLAME ARRIVES TOO FAST
SHE SHOULD NOT BLAME HERSELF NEITHER SHOULD THE DOCTORS BLAME HER👀👀
ON THE FLIP SIDE, MOTHERS SHOULDN'T MISS ANTENATAL WITH MIDWIVES OR DOCTORS.
Dear Cira,
Send this to your friend.
Let me answer this as an obstetric doctor, and let me do it gently, and deliberately, because this is not just a medical question. It is a question soaked in grief, and in guilt, and in that quiet fear that sits in the chest long after the labour room has emptied. And none of these deserve harshness.
First, please tell your friend this and say it slowly, and say it again if you must: what happened is not a moral failure, and it is not a personal failure, but could be picked if she attended her antenatal. Pregnancy is not mathematics. Birth is not a formula. They are biological events, and biology, like life, is imprecise and sometimes unruly.
Yes, during pregnancy we estimate a baby’s size. We measure the belly, and we feel with trained hands, and we use ultrasound machines that hum confidently and yet whisper uncertainties. But these are estimates, not certainties. Even the most sophisticated ultrasound, even when done close to delivery, can be wrong by 10 to 15 percent in either direction. A baby expected to weigh 4.2 kilograms can arrive quietly at 4.8, or more, without drama beforehand and without wrongdoing behind the scenes.
And no, most women do not know they are carrying a 5-kilogram baby. Large babies do not always announce themselves. Some mothers are not diabetic. Some gain what the books call 'normal' weight. Ssome tick all the right boxes and still get surprised. A big baby can sit politely in the womb, causing no alarm, until the day of birth demands its truth.
As obstetricians, our work is not prophecy. It is risk assessment. When the signs are loud diabetes, rapid growth, clear ultrasound estimates, we talk, and we plan, and we offer options, including caesarean delivery. But when the signs are subtle, or absent, a vaginal birth is often reasonable, and accepted, and entirely within standard care. Choosing that path is not negligence. It is medicine practiced with the information available at the time.
And this must be said, clearly and without apology: a bad outcome does not automatically mean a bad decision. Complications happen, even when care is appropriate, and thoughtful, and given in good faith. Medicine is powerful, yes, but it is not omnipotent.
Your friend, right now, is doing what many mothers do after a crisis. She is turning inward. She is replaying moments. She is asking herself questions that have no kind answers. Please remind her that she carried her child, she trusted her caregivers, and she showed up to birth with courage. That matters. It counts. It is not erased by outcome.
And to the doctors involved, birth humbles us all. Reflection is necessary. Learning is essential. But blame, flung carelessly or inwardly, heals no one.
This moment calls for compassion, not condemnation. For the mother. For the baby. And yes, even for the hands that tried imperfectly, humanly to usher new life safely into the world.
If there is one thing she must hear, let it be this: You did not fail your child by not knowing what no one could know with certainty.
If you're dating a man below 30 that is legitimately earning at least 300k per month, as a young girl.
You have got a good catch.
And you should be grateful to God & appreciative.
Especially if you're not working.
But your olosho mentality will not let you be great.
End.