DM Manager | Bitcoin Miner | 1st Class BSc(Hons).3D Generalist | Photojournalist | Proud to be 🇱🇰
Make the world a better place for Future Generations.
Daniel Radicliffe put himself on a strict diet before filming ‘Jungle’, international loose weight to make a survival scenes feel as real as Posible.
That level of commitment makes this one of his strongest perfomances.
WHEN FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD FINISH A $35K SITE, HERE'S EVERYTHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IN THE FOLDER.
no mockups, no "phase 2 next week." this is what ships - ready to hand a client:
→ the live site
a scroll-driven build - GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis, pinned sections, scrubbed video, zero hand-coded keyframes.
→ the footage (yours to keep)
a hero clip + one b-roll per section, generated in Higgsfield from 30+ models. not licensed stock - owned outright.
→ the optimized assets
frames extracted, converted to WebP, lazy-loaded. loads instant, even on mobile.
→ the cinematic layer
film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no plugins, no designer.
→ copy + responsive layout
section copy drafted, breakpoints handled, mobile-tuned.
that's the full studio deliverable. minus the studio, minus the month, minus the invoice.
CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP):
add it as a custom connector in Claude Code:
- mcp_servers:
- higgsfield:
- url: "https://t.co/ccj3bJ8Bcy"
one OAuth flow.
Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand.
THE MATH:
→ what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+
→ what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits
→ what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session
agencies sold you the folder. they just took a month and $35k to fill it.
Follow me, reply "FOLDER" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook.
full breakdown in the article 👇
22 yaşındaki bir İspanyol kızı, ChatGPT'ye 12 dolarlık bir domain buldurdu. 17 gün sonra, Silikon Vadisi'nden bir girişimci ondan 13.000 dolara satın aldı.
İstek basitti:
"Bana henüz kimsenin bilmediği, ama 30 gün içinde patlayacak bir teknoloji terimi bul. (…) .com'un müsait olup olmadığını kontrol et. Basit tut."
ChatGPT, ona 9 dakikada küçük bir scraper yazdı. Kız, botu telefonundan çalıştırdı. Ve hepsi bu kadar.
1.Gün Bot bir terim yakaladı: "synthetic memory". Uzman bir podcast'te 23 kez bahsedilmiş. Twitter'da sıfır. Kız, öğle yemeği aralığında 14 dolara (…).com'u satın aldı.
2.Gün Terim, Hacker News ana sayfasında göründü. Telefonu direkt mesajlarla dolup taştı.
3.Gün Menlo Park'ten bir girişimci masaya 13.000 dolar koydu. Kız pazarlığı bitirmedi. 13.000 dolar + 80 bin takipçisi olan adamın hesabından bir teşekkür tweet'i de istedi ve aldı.
Aynı gün, 10 saniyelik kısa bir video çekti. Sadece gülümsüyor. Elinde telefon, ekranda satış onayı. Üstünde tek bir yazı:
14 dolar → 13.000 dolar. 16. gün ChatGPT'ye sadece bir soru sordu.
Video 4,9 milyon izlenme aldı. Binlerce kişi yorumlara tek bir kelime yazdı: SIGNAL.
Kızın tek cümlesi şu:
"Hızlı olmak, zengin olmaktan iyidir. Bunu kanıtlamak istedim."
A $10 A MONTH AI MUSIC TOOL JUST PUT SOMEONE ON THE BILLBOARD GOSPEL CHART
One artist used an AI music generator to create R&B and gospel tracks, which they then uploaded to Spotify
One song has been streamed over 13 million times. It reached number three on Billboard's gospel chart, making it the first fully AI-generated artist to chart on a Billboard radio ranking. Five songs earned $52,000 in royalties in two months
Here's what actually works for most people:
> An 80-track catalogue of lo-fi and meditation music: $5,000 per month (no musical background required)
> Sleep and focus playlists: $30,000 in four months
> 10–20 tracks per week, scaling up successful content: ~$200 per day
Tools:
> Suno Pro $10/month (converts text to a finished track in under a minute)
> Distributor $22/year (pushes to over 100 platforms)
The niche matters more than the song. Sleep music, meditation music, ambient music and gospel music these categories reward volume over talent. The people making real money aren't necessarily the most talented
I MADE MY FATHER’S ENTIRE MONTHLY SALARY IN ONE HOUR.
No listings. No camera. No talking.
I pulled photos from luxury Airbnb properties.
Dropped them into Claude on my 300TB home cloud. One prompt created perfect first-person walkthrough videos with smooth gimbal motion and exact room details.
Sent three. Two hosts paid instantly.
The ORICO server handled everything privately.
Instant access. Zero monthly fees. Automatic backups. Ready for the next batch before the first payment cleared.
One hour. Silent clicks. Father’s salary replaced.
Home cloud plus Airbnb is silent cash flow on repeat.
Everyone's selling prompt engineering courses and the engineer who built Claude Code just gave the whole playbook away for free.
28 minutes. No fluff.
He walks through how he structures CLAUDE.md, when to split work across parallel sessions, and a few memory tricks I'd never seen anyone mention.
People pay $300-$500 for courses that teach less than his first 10 minutes.
BOOKMARK it, watch it tonight:
🎬 Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 SOL: Same Prompt, Different Results
I tested the same Kabuki-inspired concept in Arcads using both models.
Going in, I expected Fable 5 to come out on top because of its polished output.
But after comparing the results, GPT-5.6 SOL surprised me.
It delivered:
🎥 More dynamic camera movement
✨ Richer visual details
🎭 A stronger cinematic feel overall
Both models are impressive, but for this particular test, GPT-5.6 SOL produced the result I preferred.
The takeaway? Don't assume the newest or most popular model is always the best. Test the same prompt across different models—you might be surprised by the outcome.
Which one would you choose? 👇
China just unveiled an AI blackboard at their World AI Conference. Kids learning to build with AI in real time.
Meanwhile American schools are still debating whether students should be allowed to touch it.
One country is training builders. The other is training hiders.
Come back in ten years and tell me which approach produced better engineers.
A guy's photo just started talking — and it never opened its mouth.
Almost 19,000 stars on GitHub for a system that animates any still portrait without a single frame of new footage.
It doesn't just make the picture move.
Watch what happens when you feed it one photo and a short driving video.
The AI instantly transfers every blink, smirk, and head turn onto the still image — mapping the exact facial motion frame by frame, in real time.
No 3D scanning, no mocap suit, no film crew — it just reads how a face moves in one clip and re-projects it onto another.
The whole thing generates a frame in 12.8 milliseconds on a single GPU. That's faster than your screen refreshes.
Traditional facial animation requires actors, rigs, and weeks of manual keyframing.
Now, one selfie is a fully directable actor — and it even works on cats, dogs, and pandas.
Someone just made a single photo dance better than most humans.
A 14-billion-parameter AI that turns any still image into a full choreographed performance — no video footage required.
It doesn't just move the picture.
Watch what happens when you feed it one static photo of a person.
The AI extracts their skeleton, maps 17 keypoints, and retargets an entire dance sequence onto their body — frame by frame, in perfect sync.
No motion capture suits, no studio, no dancer — it just reads the pose and breathes life into pixels.
The whole pipeline runs from one line of code and a single JPEG.
Traditional animation requires weeks of rigging, keyframing, and a team of artists.
Now, your camera roll is a casting agency full of dancers.