For example, 30% of the supply is airdropped.
The fund baby and father and qomx token have different weighted values because of lp pool size. Lets say fund holders are getting 10% share of the airdrop And you hold 5% of the fund circulating supply, you will get 0.5% airdrop of new Qom supply
It’s fair system and you can keep your assets on ql1 in case Mesquite and Louis come back to develope QL1.
They are getting rich on “paper”
Only ones getting rich are the banks and Elon Musk .
Infinty USD supply also making things worst.
Enjoy the future, create new currency on Mars.
I will be taking a break from QL1. I will keep
@QomX_io running on QL1 blockchain while I am gone.
If things are not resolved I will launch my own quantum proof blockchain with new cosmos stack, hybrid signatures with Falcon-512 and ML-DSA-65, full PQ via DoraFactory, PQ TLS for nodes and RPC, EIP-770 account abstraction.
It will be quantum proof from day 1.
Only QOM X, FUND, BABY, FATHER holders will be airdropped new $QOM supply. The snapshot date will be hidden to prevent manipulation and announced afterwards. Same growth plan for Qom X exchange after i get it working on the new chain.
I will let you know if I need any help. All of this is not necessary if OG QL1 devs come back and help the people. I will monitor the situation.
Thank your for your attention to this matter.
-Herr
Create demand for $QOM
Right now you can buy in one of two ways.
1. Deposit usdt to @QomX_io CEX
2. Deposit usdt to Q Bridge and buy on the Qom X Alpha Dex in the Q/QOM LP pool.
In the future, your favorite memecoins will be paired to QOM on the CEX.
This is my vision, there are other community members who have their owns visions and are executing their will.
Join the people.
@TehFund You are correct, perseverance & dedication to the cause required.
Look at this guy @Waterman_crypto, he's been shilling these 4 coins hard for ages & look at what started happening the last couple of days.
$Fund & $Qom arguably got even better alpha🔥
https://t.co/iwifYx0gfG
Qom X Price Discrepancy & Arbitrage 101: Liquidity Pools vs Order Books
There’s currently a clear price gap between the Q/QOM LP pool on QomX Alpha DEX and the QomX CEX:
• DEX LP price: ~ 0.000000004 $Q per $QOM
• CEX highest bid: ~ 0.0000000014
Roughly 2.86× higher on the DEX pool right now.
This creates a potential arbitrage opportunity and a perfect real-world example of how DEX liquidity pools and CEX order books discover price differently.
Order Books on CEX (like QomX CEX)
Centralized exchanges use a live order book:
• Bids (buy orders) — stacked from highest price down. The highest bid (0.0000000014 here) is the best price sellers can hit immediately.
• Asks (sell orders) — stacked from lowest price up.
Price is set by matching overlapping buy & sell orders in real time.
Key traits:
• Visible depth at every price level
• Market makers tighten spreads
• Large orders can slip if the book is thin (you eat through multiple levels and get a worse average price)
• Highest bid = best immediate sell price on CEX
Liquidity Pools on DEX (like QomX Alpha DEX)
Most DEXes (including QomX’s) use Automated Market Makers (AMMs) with liquidity pools instead of order books.
Liquidity Providers (LPs) deposit both tokens of a pair ($Q stable + QOM) into a smart contract pool in equal value.
Price is calculated mathematically from the ratio of reserves in the pool (classic constant-product formula):
x × y = k
• No bids or asks.
• When you sell QOM into the pool, you increase the QOM reserve → the price of QOM moves against you (you get slightly less Q per token the more you sell).
• This is called slippage / price impact — bigger relative to pool size = worse execution.
LPs earn a share of every swap fee automatically. Anyone can add liquidity or swap permissionlessly.
The Arbitrage Opportunity Right Now
When the DEX pool prices QOM higher than the CEX bid level:
Traders can attempt to:
1. Buy QOM on the QomX CEX (watch the full order book — take asks or place bids near the current levels for best fill).
2. Transfer/bridge QOM to the DEX environment.
3. Sell into the Q/QOM LP pool on Alpha DEX at the higher ~0.000000004 price.
Profit = price difference minus all costs (CEX fees + withdrawal/bridge, DEX swap fee, gas, slippage on both sides, time risk).
What happens when arbs execute?
• More buying on CEX → CEX price tends to rise
• More selling into the DEX pool → pool price tends to fall (reserves shift)
• The two venues converge toward equilibrium.
Arbitrageurs are the invisible hand that keeps prices aligned across the hybrid ecosystem.
Why the QL1-Infinite Drive dual-chain architecture in the Cosmos ecosystem is one of the cleanest "sister chain" strategies in the space.
Clear Division of Roles:
QL1 = "Meme Coin Planet"
Personality: Wild, chaotic, fun, permissionless
Primary Use Case: High-volume meme trading, social experiments, spam-friendly micro-transactions, degen playground
Token: $QOM (ultra-low fees)
Infinite = "Hyperspace" Infrastructure Layer
Personality: Serious, robust, production-grade
Primary Use Case: DeFi, smart contracts, IBC mesh, bridges, staking derivatives, governance, launchpad
Tokens: $42 (staking + gas) + $FISH (rewards & incentives)
This separation isn't accidental — it's deliberate and smart.
QL1 stays extremely cheap and law-of-the-jungle style. No pressure to be "serious." It can be the chaotic meme engine that attracts eyeballs, liquidity, and new users who love the energy.
Infinite focuses on being the reliable backbone. Precompiles, deep liquidity pools, validator incentives, cross-chain tools, and long-term sovereignty mechanisms live here. It doesn't have to compete on meme volume or race to the bottom on fees.
How the Two Chains Complement Each Other:
1. Liquidity & Capital Flow
Memes and retail frenzy stay on QL1 where fees are dirt cheap and turnover is lightning fast. Serious capital and yield-seeking liquidity migrate to Infinite for deeper pools, better execution, and $FISH rewards.
The Stargate bridge acts as the connective tissue — capital can flow back and forth depending on market conditions. Bull market memes pump on QL1 → profits bridge to Infinite for yield → infrastructure gets stronger.
2. Developer Strategy
Meme creators, experimenters, and quick viral plays launch on QL1.
Ambitious teams building staking derivatives, advanced DeFi, cross-chain apps, or governance tools go to Infinite where the tooling and precompiles are superior.
This creates natural segmentation instead of forcing every project into one compromised environment.
3. Token Utility (Clean & Non-Overlapping)
$QOM = pure gas for the fun, high-velocity layer.
$42 = staking, governance, and economic security for the infrastructure layer.
$FISH = the incentive flywheel rewarding liquidity providers, node operators, and ecosystem participants (with potential bridge synergy to QL1).
Why This Structure Makes Sense Long-Term:
Most chains fall into the trap of one token trying to do everything — gas, staking, governance, memes, incentives — and ending up mediocre at all of them.
This setup avoids that entirely:
QL1 can remain hyper-cheap without token value pressure destroying the user experience.
Infinite can focus purely on building robust, credible infrastructure.
The bridge creates a beautiful flywheel: Meme volume & attention on QL1 → Capital flows to Infinite for yield → Stronger infrastructure attracts serious builders & TVL → Better tools & products → Even more activity back on QL1.
The close coordination between Infinite devs and early $FUND holders is another underrated advantage. It significantly reduces the risk of the two chains drifting apart or competing destructively.
Bottom Line:
QL1 as the super-cheap meme planet and Infinite as the serious hyperspace infrastructure chain is a coherent, logical, and elegant split. It plays to each chain’s natural strengths instead of fighting them.
If the Stargate bridge delivers smooth UX and $FISH incentives are well-calibrated, the combined ecosystem could become quite powerful — giving holders exposure to both the chaotic fun/volume upside and the real utility/infrastructure upside.
This is how you design for different user personas and market cycles at the same time.
https://t.co/qNrpsXhC0q https://t.co/O7nUJWQMXz
I am updating the QOM CEX backend.
There are over 200,000 lines of code and I need to check manually each one is correct after updating for new markets to be listed.
I don’t know when but shall stay with the motto SOON.
$SHIB $BNB $ETH
VC funding for L1s was solid in 2025 (~$1.3B in one tally) but cooled sharply in 2026.
Recent commentary notes capital shifting away from “faster/cheaper me-too L1s” toward infrastructure with clear moats, revenue, stablecoins, RWAs, and compliance.
Even when having infrastructure; VC’s still rugged chains like
berachain, Solana, and Monad.
$QOM has infrastructure, has visions, is SPECIAL. The people control it.