Mai

[Mai @Mai97co]

在格局这块，甩达里奥十条街

[xiax｜AI & Agents @xiax0603]

🚨AI行业扎心现实：防模型“蒸馏”，代价是废掉模型本身！

很多人疑惑，OpenAI明明手握顶尖技术，为何放任对手通过API蒸馏做平替。

奥特曼访谈道出核心矛盾：
✅能防蒸馏抄袭，但防护会削弱模型的发散、生成能力
✅如果强行上锁，普通用户拿到的产品体验会大幅降级
✅权衡之下，宁愿承受被蒸馏的损失，也不破���原生模型能力

同时澄清算力暴雷误区：并不缺少资本，最大约束是晶圆与硅片产能。

钱可以无限，芯片制造产能却有硬天花板。

[Mai @Mai97co]

@thsottiaux What the hell are you guys even doing over there? You have way more headcount than Anthropic, yet Codex is still a buggy pile of shit. How is that even possible?

[Mai @Mai97co]

@thsottiaux such ugly UI 💩

[Mai @Mai97co]

@thsottiaux You guys will never figure out how to put as much thought into UI aesthetics as Claude does.

[Mai @Mai97co]

@leodev @thsottiaux What the hell are you guys even doing over there? You have way more headcount than Anthropic, yet Codex is still a buggy pile of shit. How is that even possible?

[Mai @Mai97co]

@darekgusto @trq212 @thsottiaux such ugly 💩

[Mai @Mai97co]

@thsottiaux such ugly

[Mai @Mai97co]

@thsottiaux
You guys will never figure out how to put as much thought into UI aesthetics as Claude does.

[ClaudeDevs @ClaudeDevs]

We've been working hard on making the Claude Code desktop app great for running lots of sessions side by side.

It's now much quicker to start sessions, easier to split work across a few, and you can always see what each of them is doing. Here’s what's new:

[Mai @Mai97co]

@ClaudeDevs @thsottiaux You guys will never figure out how to put as much thought into UI aesthetics as Claude does.

[Mai @Mai97co]

太屌了

[Sac @Saccc_c]

花费16天，我用 Opus 5.5 将小王子的故事制作成了3D剧情游戏

结合Tripo+Blender，Opus 5.5 将小王子故事中的每一个星球变成了可探索的3D场景

希望大家能支持一手，后续会开源整个游戏，以及详细制作流程

Welcome to The Little Prince: Across the Stars✨：https://t.co/qr4wR0jLu3

[Mai @Mai97co]

库克直言，友商抄苹果总是先抄看得见的东西：硬件、设计、包装，甚至能模仿得八九不离十。

但拆解报告里拆不出真正的内核，组织文化、决策机制，以及近乎偏执的优先级排序。

三星机型更多、谷歌工程师更足、亚马逊渠道更强，却依然造不出同样的体验。

逆向工程一部 iPhone 只是工程问题，但逆向工程“苹果如何决定造什么”，才是耗时几十年的壁垒。

[Guillermo Flor @guilleflorvs]

Tim Cook's take on why competitors can't copy Apple is sharper than most people realize.

They start by copying the product. Then they realize the product isn't the hard part.

Cook said it directly: people who try to copy Apple first try to copy what they can see. The hardware. The design. The packaging. And they can get close on all of it.

But the thing that made the product — the organizational culture, the decision-making, the obsessive prioritization — that's invisible from the outside. You can't find it in a teardown.

This is why Apple's moat has held for decades while better-funded competitors kept losing. Samsung had more SKUs. Google had more engineers. Amazon had more distribution. None of it translated into the same output because none of it replicated the same input.

The lesson for founders is uncomfortable: if your competitive advantage is visible in your product, it's already copyable. The real moat is the culture that makes the product — and that takes decades to build, not quarters.

Reverse-engineering the iPhone is an engineering problem. Reverse-engineering how Apple decides what to build is a different problem entirely.

[Mai @Mai97co]

终于来了

[Google for Developers @googledevs]

🏁 Taking Gemini 4 Argon for a spin in Google @Antigravity.

Learn how @genevieve__h transforms a desk photo into an interactive 3D racing game by using Argon to orchestrate subagents and leverage Nano Banana to generate assets for the build.

[Mai @Mai97co]

@GoogleCloud_ME still��

[Mai @Mai97co]

@octoberry next developers day

[Mai @Mai97co]

@zazzy_stardust

[Mai @Mai97co]

@AdityaJhajhar12 As long as it isn't released, it remains the best.。

[Mai @Mai97co]

@notjazii 🤡

[Mai @Mai97co]

@saloniiio 🤡

[Mai @Mai97co]

@Mr_Salio hhhhhh

[Mai @Mai97co]

@alwayspriyesh