Liam

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Rickaayyyyy Crazy since there are still good and great episodes in both s1 and s2. So this is just a straight lie

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@JammerLammy1997 @HimejoshiLover I disagree, while Maul did want to die, it’s his hatred and connection to Obiwan that kept him alive. He went into the fight to win, but was gonna accept both outcomes. A sort of “only one of us will come out of this alive” mentality.

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@jakonian The least problematic thing about the series. Especially since the jedi were WRONG in TPM cause they couldn’t believe maul was a Sith in the first place.

The series is just poorly written

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@kingusofdingus @hakkevakke I wouldn’t call it misogyny, but the point the poster is making is that the problem is he “believes feeling these things are bad.” Not that the feelings are bad themselves.

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@prplekoolaidman @johnehrett I mean… he DID used to bullseye womp rats back home

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@evertonianscrud Technically both. Going up in sequences will increase all previous sequence abilities. For example, Sleepless requires only like 6hr of sleep, but when you get to nightmare it goes down to only 2hrs

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@GalacticCurator @MarcoMilk I think the funniest part is this isn’t even trying to break the elevators (cause it doesn’t), he just destroys the comms device cause he was panicking

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@JasonSokol3 Lucasfilm gotta trust me. IM a better writer, director and producer than George Lucas ever was.

No I don’t have any prior experience, why does that matter?

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist Oh my god you figured it out! Yes I am totally Ai and not a real person, congratulations.

Imagine resorting to ad hominem (attacking ME rather than the argument) and being rude too.

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist Yes? What is the point of this question

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist Genuinely what is this argument??? How are these even remotely relevant.

As for what it is, scripture is the canonical works of the Bible, written by the chosen disciples.

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist In what way and how? You are just saying generalized statements with out ANY backing and expecting that to be an argument

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist Or… and now hear me out, you actually give EXAMPLES of these so called “unexplainable things” Christians refuse to answer that I can then refute, instead of insulting Christians as a whole

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist Mott and Bailey is when you have one argument and then redirect to an easier argument instead as a defense

You went from “Christians can’t explain anything” to “Christians believe everything started and ends with god”. Different arguments with different answers that you make one

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist What are you even yapping about at this point my guy. How does any of this apply to what I said

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist It’s as simple as that. Just as you have your own beliefs as to the origins of the universe (always existed- came from nothing- etc.) the idea “god made the universe” is that belief for us

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist No it’s not you just don’t understand or are intentionally misconstruing my words. ALL OF SCRIPTURE can be explained. There is no logical inconsistency within the text (as what the original post is about). “God is mystical” is there because we believe god created the universe.

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist This is the motte and Bailey fallacy. You’re changing the argument to try and defend an easier argument. YOU said that Christians refuse to explain scripture and use the excuse “god works in mysterious ways”. That’s a straw man as people can and DO explain it.

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist No it’s not your point. This all started with you arguing that Christians can’t explain scripture and chalk it up to mysticism. I’m saying all scripture can be easily explained in historical, narrative and logical context. The only “mystical” thing is that we believe a god exists

[Liam @MailBlas2]

@Seesamaet @thesinanist Which again, is a straw man. There are plenty of phenomenal Christian historians who are online that can thoroughly explain any number of scripture in both a historical and narrative lens. The only Mystical thing would be god himself.