@SHobbs11957@lmtobias Andrew and his loyal cucks don’t get to redefine what “overwhelming evidence” is. I put this into ChatGPT. It’s hilarious to me that you think Andrew Wilson has any credibility. You look as low IQ and dishonest as he is. Birds of a feather flock together.
@putter_jaxx We need to get back to the government our forefathers created, term limits, multiple parties, no foreign interests, secure voting, no special interest groups. A watch dog group like DOGE for all expenditures. Bring manufacturing back to this country.
@SHobbs11957@lmtobias Unfortunately for Andrew and all his cucks, he doesn’t get to redefine what “overwhelming evidence is”. “By overwhelming I mean convincing”, turns out all it takes to convince Andrew is money. Watch this lairs flip flop. You have zero discernment.
https://t.co/HEWqOthSFL
@SHobbs11957@lmtobias Everyone has the presumption of innocence. Innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. It’s on the state to prove guilt. That was Andrew’s goal in the debate. In the debate he said he was 75-85% certain based on the states evidence. That’s reasonable doubt.
@PoliCrusader@lmtobias You lose all credibility when you call me or Candace or anyone else a grifter, then give Andrew Wilson a pass on grifting, showing fake evidence, lying, gaslighting and manipulating. Do you comprehend how fucking retarded and culty you sound? 😅🤡
@PoliCrusader@lmtobias You can call many things but a liar is not one of them. The only grifter in all this is Andrew Wilson. Proof of his flip flop. He was paid by TPUSA to flip his position. He lies all the time so that says a lot about your level of discernment.
https://t.co/rGWake0GZn
I found this video interesting. A billionaires kid spilling the beans on Erika Kirk. He confirms some of what Candace has said. It would be interesting if Candace could confirm things he is saying.
Worth a watch, what’s your thoughts?
https://t.co/t6q5yW1MDJ
@RealCandaceO
@ErinBWea@paleochristcon He is getting paid by them. Andrew admitted that “he was paid by TPUSA for debate training”. Which is hard to imagine since he lies all the time there is more to it than that. The first words out of his mouth at the debate was to defend Israel and to read a fake text from TPUSA
@thedoorhemet@lmtobias Positive actions have positive consequences and negative actions have negative consequences. You get to choose your actions but not your consequences. Choose your actions wisely. Andrew crossed the line with fake evidence and outright calling Tyler a murder.