Insults aren’t evidence and I don’t waste my time arguing with idiots
You’re known for posting adult content just to chase Elon money, yet you’re here questioning my research.
We all know what you did with Vibecions. You pushed a pointless CTO, dumped on innocent people, and now you’re pretending to have the moral high ground.
I presented on-chain evidence. You presented insults. That tells everyone who actually has an argument.
Go make another engagement-farming post and leave blockchain analysis to people who understand it.
✍️ Musa
🚨 $CATOID IS LIVE ON @Pumpfun 🚨
The first full-spectrum RGB cat on Solana.
No utility.
No roadmap.
Just pure vibes and diamond paws.
CA: EfU4xWf6c6ZqPKcBxWDjDQyak4iExcBoehXaSacrpump
Comment your Solana address below 👇
I took some time to investigate the on-chain activity of $SUNUSI
Here’s what I found📌
From my investigation, it appears that the website used by @SunusiMinjibir had a malicious mechanism built into it.
The website was programmed so that whenever you tried to burn tokens, it would burn only 0.1% of the amount you intended to destroy, while automatically transferring the remaining 99.9% to another wallet.
In the case of $SUNUSI, they attempted to burn more than 242M tokens. However, because of how the website was programmed, only about 242K tokens (0.1%) were actually burned, while the rest was transferred
You can verify this directly on-chain.
One of the most deceptive parts is that when you click on the transfer transaction on-chain, it redirects you to the burn transaction, making it appear as though the tokens were burned.
This was a sophisticated trick, and even experienced people can fall victim to scams like this.
I’m not posting this to blindly defend @SunusiMinjibir I’m simply sharing what I found from the on-chain data, which is public and transparent
In my opinion, the biggest mistake was telling people to sell. It may have been better to ask holders to stay calm and organize a CTO (Community Takeover) after the hackers were gone.
My heart goes out to everyone who lost money in this incident.
Based on the on-chain evidence I reviewed, I couldn’t find any indication that @SunusiMinjibir intended to harm holders. The apparent intention was to burn tokens and reduce the circulating supply, but the website’s malicious code prevented that from happening.
If anyone disagrees with this conclusion, I encourage them to present on-chain evidence rather than make accusations without proof.
I did this research to find the truth, not to take anyone’s side.
Finally, I’d like to send my heartfelt support to @SunusiMinjibir and wish him all the best moving forward. ❤️
✍️ Musa