Since 2005 we have led the agenda for the introduction of mandatory reporting of suspected + known child sexual abuse by those who work in #RegulatedActivities
@EthicalApproach@mandatenow Morally Derelict Interference
Nicholas Holtam
Bishop of Salisbury
Trashed Chief Inspector Mike Veale’s ‘Operation Conifer’ Report on Edward Heath
Queasily sycophantic Heath apologist
Church of England Newspaper
https://t.co/IL2uilv4BM
@ciabaudo@reeves3915 (RIP) @IanKerr
England’s new CSA Reporting Law - A close examination of a hollow duty. Damning piece by Tom Perry of @mandatenow on the failings of the government’s so-called mandatory reporting law https://t.co/NXHlWRR8bH
CLOSING SOON: Take part in a government inquiry collecting evidence on the effectiveness of the current definition of regulated activity with children for faith communities in England and Wales.
Take part now: https://t.co/d560J4ozFN
This might explain why the government has chosen to implement a completely ineffective version of Mandatory Reporting, which looks designed not to produce any increase in reports of abused children.
Police forces in England and Wales are struggling to effectively investigate online Child Sexual Abuse and manage registered sex offenders, as rising demand continues to exceed resources, a new report has found.
#Policing
https://t.co/3bsqIABNdR
Or it could be that the government is intent on ensuring that 0.3% figure is not exceeded and so has stated nothing about the duty in the new statutory guidance.
You choose.
There is a govt consultation out on revisions to "Keeping Children Safe in Education". By the time the new version is published, the new "Duty to Report CSA" in the Crime & Policing Bill will be in force.
But the new draft makes no mention of the new duty. None.
Incredible.
There are two possible explanations for this. It could be is that communications within government are so bad that the DfE doesn't know what is in a Bill sponsored by the HO even though it contains measures which greatly affect it.
No Catholic bishop is going to discipline a priest who withholds evidence of child sex abuse obtained in confession, and given Canon Law they are very unlikely to refer a non-reporter to the DBS under any circumstance at all. And there is no consequence on them as a result.
In UK the Crime and Policing Bill is woefully inadequate when judged against what the churches do. There is a “duty to report” child sex abuse but enforcement is effectively in the hands of employers who may (not must) refer non-reporters to the Disclosure and Barring Service.
Canon law and #MandatoryReporting of Child Sexual Abuse to civil authorities
#LawReform
Countries would be well advised to follow Australian legislation to overcome deficiencies in #CanonLaw
https://t.co/F2gR1yNrBp
@DellasLaw They are being similarly self-congratulatory about implementing the IICSA recommendation on “mandatory reporting” of child sex abuse, except that they left out the “mandatory” bit.
@GrahamGGrant Very interesting. It will be a surprise if anything comes of it, because there isn't any law requiring people to report suspected child sex abuse. There is a law requiring people to report suspected money laundering (Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, sections 330-334).
@Beloved71478281@Richard_Scorer In a strict legal sense they are right in that a public inquiry can’t force Parliament to legislate. But the government did make an unequivocal promise that it accepted at least 4 recommendations “in full” and has gone back on that promise.
On 16 January 2025, Yvette Cooper (then Home Secretary made the a statement in the Commons about the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA). It was as follows:
@MaggieOliverUK “The barrister also said the home secretary had “accepted in full” the four recommendations that relate to her department.”
Not true. The mandatory reporting recommendation was accepted without the mandatory bit. Would be very happy to talk to your legal team about this.
“The barrister also said the home secretary had “accepted in full” the four recommendations that relate to her department.”
This is not true. You can’t implement mandatory reporting without the criminal sanction proposed by IICSA and then claim you have accepted IICSA “in full”.
The government reneged on that promise. The "Duty to Report" in the Crime and Policing Bill doesn't have a criminal sanction which was the key element of the IICSA recommendation. They have left out the mandatory bit. The duty to report has no plausible enforcement mechanism.