@ChibiReviews Personally I don’t trust the source. Those guys who interviewed him asked really leading questions, put a ton of words in this mouth and got information flat out wrong in the article. I’d look more closely at the actual content before panicking. The article feels like ragebait.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ It’s a graphical change. It’s graphics. Also why does it matter how long I complain about it? I said it matters. You’re the one saying the matter is trivial. The only one who’s a hypocrite by spending so long on this is you.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ “Art style” is a generic word for the look of a game. Assassin’s Creed uses realism. And yeah, all of that is still graphics. What do you think graphics even is? You think 3D models aren’t part of it? The fucking characters are made of 3D models.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ Buddy…it’s a 3D modeled generated art asset. It’s rendered the exact same way as every other 3D object in the game. How in the everloving fuck does that not fall under the umbrella of graphics?
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ I'm sorry what? It's an in-game visual asset. That's what graphics is. Why do I get the sense that your definition for what is and isn't relevant will somehow include everything that isn't this just so you don't have to answer this one question.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ Your FIRST post was deflection. Coming into an aesthetic topic and demanding people stop talking about aesthetics and instead only talk about gameplay is deflecting.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ You came into a thread talking about aesthetic issues and now you want to change the subject? You repeatedly try to deflect and change the subject because you actually have no answer for what Ubisoft did.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ Well why would Ubisoft waste time and money on something "trivial" then? Seems like that time would be better spent on things like gameplay, right?
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ You use a discussion app to talk about things you care about. Why would you waste your time talking about things that are "trivial?" Unless you're lying and actually think it isn't trivial.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ You’re all about the gameplay right? Clearly based Ubisoft made this change for a reason right? What could that reason have been? I’m sure it makes the game better, right?
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ I’m retarded? I’m Judy replying every time I’m replied to. You were the guy who went to a thread about a “trivial” issue and whined about it and the proceeded to reply every time. It’s not trivial. If it was, you’d block or ignore me.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ You have to justify the change since it was obviously okay the first time around. They bothered to make it different. So why? I assume covering up the statue affected the gameplay yes? That’s why they had to change it? Please explain how.
@trashbagbbyxo@SirAthelstan_ Yes? When did I ever say I was the one who thought it was trivial? That’s you. Every time you reply to me you prove me right.