As someone who ships LLM systems in production, this scaling video is the closest thing to a "why 96% of Claude and GPT-5's weights are literally useless" explainer I've ever seen released for free.
Everyone thinks trillion-parameter models need every parameter. They don't. A 2019 pruning experiment proved you can delete 96% of a neural net's weights with zero performance loss - meaning most of Claude and GPT-5 is empty scaffolding around a tiny "winning lottery ticket" network doing all the real work.
Bookmark this 18-min video and watch tonight. Same lottery ticket math from 2019 MIT research, now the reason every AI lab wastes 90%+ of its Nvidia budget.
Someone bought a billboard in SF to advertise a new LLM
...but the LLM is a real guy answering every message, including image gen requests he hand-draws
He's been talking to thousands of people per day, and had to pause new usage due to overwhelming demand
(h/t @tucksbryant)
A DEVELOPER WALKED ON STAGE DRESSED AS A 1973 ENGINEER AND "PREDICTED" THE FUTURE OF PROGRAMMING. THE TWIST: EVERYTHING HE DESCRIBED WAS ALREADY INVENTED 40 YEARS EARLIER AND WE STILL REFUSE TO USE IT.
32 minutes from Bret Victor, doing the most quietly savage talk on our entire industry.
-> The idea that lands: we write code as step-by-step text instructions and call that "Just how programming is". He shows four better ways -- all discovered in the 60s and 70s, all abandoned.
Manipulate the data directly instead of typing blind code. Tell the machine your goal instead of every tiny step. We saw all this, then walked away.
Why? The moment you're sure you know what programming is, you stop seeing anything better. That certainty is the cage.
And now AI is dragging us back to exactly what he begged for -- you describe the goal in plain words, the machine works out the how. The future he mourned is arriving anyway.
You thought text files were just how code works. This is the talk that shows it was a choice, and maybe the wrong one.
Watch this one. It'll ruin how you see your job ↓
المقابلات في مجال المحولات لا تختبر الحفظ بل الفهم العملي. جمعنا هنا أكثر من 75 سؤالًا حقيقيًا مصنفة حسب الوظيفة، ولكل سؤال: إجابة مختصرة تنجيك، وإجابة احترافية تميزك، وخطأ شائع تتجنبه، وسؤال متابعة تتوقعه.
https://t.co/VVMF8bl4D2
⚡️ ارتقِ بمستواك الكهربائي والمهني! 🚀
استثمر في مستقبلك مع هذه الباقة المختارة من الدورات الاحترافية على منصة Udemy، والمصممة خصيصاً للمهندسين والمهتمين بمجال الكهرباء والطاقة وتطوير الذات.
اختر مسارك وابدأ التعلم الآن 👇
⚡️ مسار الأنظمة الكهربائية
والقوى:
🔹 دورة المحولات الكهربائية
🔗 https://t.co/B76buTgYWC
🔹 محطات التحويل الكهربائية
🔗 https://t.co/J6d8DAEeN3
🔹 توليد وإنتاج الكهرباء
🔗 https://t.co/EmJkRa2nUJ
🔹 دورة محركات ومولدات
🔗 https://t.co/wKHaZqb2jC
🔹 أساسيات كهرباء المنازل
🔗 https://t.co/z47UQiJmNy
🔹 محطات الديزل وأنظمة UPS
🔗 https://t.co/SR6N675eF2
☀️ مسار الطاقة الشمسية:
🔸 أساسيات أنظمة الخلايا الشمسية
🔗 https://t.co/CRu5ydk6C8
🔸 حسابات الأنظمة الشمسية المتصلة بالشبكة
🔗 https://t.co/6NTITBRlvu
💼 مسار التطوير المهني والمهارات:
💡 العقلية الهندسية المحترفة : دليلك من التخرج للقيادة
🔗 https://t.co/fDCnuKhF5y
💡 تسويق نفسك للوظيفة والعمل الحر
🔗 https://t.co/zV2b28gQR3
💡 تعريف بتخصص الهندسة الكهربائية
🔗 https://t.co/yue0Pbiukr
📌 أفضل استثمار هو استثمارك في تطوير مهاراتك..! 👷♂️👷♀️
@KarthickRa55825@dmmsell Looks like some type of ray. I don't think this species has a barb though because otherwise it would be too dangerous for the diver.
@grizzcosbbg I been playing for 10+ years. Minecraft is the worst case of wasted potential I've have ever seen. When Notch was in charge, his updates meant something, now they just keep adding color blocks with every update because they're too scared to actually do anything real with the game
@ayeejuju This basically tells us that calculating probability depends on what you know about the sample size. If the process is a black box, the chances are 50/50 because every outcome is equal. But if all information is available to you, it will either be 0 or 100 (outcome determined).
@ayeejuju This whole thing can evolve into a huge argument about determinism and radical skepticism, but keeping it simple: His 50/50 view can only be consistent if he believes that causality isn't real, which is absurd by common sense. While radical determinism always assumes 0% or 100%.
@ProtectorNation@inpic0 مو بحسب عقيدتي فقط، أنا كمسلم صاحب الحق وهو صاحب الباطل، ادعائي هنا مطلق وليس مقيد.
لو ساويت بينهم معناها أنا مسوي نفسي إني مؤمن، وأرى إنه قيمة الصنم هذا مثل قيمة المسجد، تمثيل ونفاق الشغلة بتصير، وهذا غير مقبول بتاتًا.
@ProtectorNation@inpic0 الفرق انه احنا أصحاب الحق. لا يستوي الباطل والحق أبدًا، نحن لنا ما ليس لهم لأننا على الملة الصحيحة، أما الكافر اللي يعبد الحجر والصنم لا يستوي مع ��ن يعبد إله الكون.
ولو عندك مشكلة راجع انتماءك.