We ran the identical code-audit task 10× each through Claude Code and Manna Code. Same model (Opus 4.8), same effort, same prompt, fresh session per run.
Claude Code: $0.88/run
Manna Code: $0.43/run
Both scored 11/11. Same answers — half the bill.
@ucsandman The hard stop is the key. If an agent can inspect its own context before touching email or files, you can catch the risky combination earlier. Boundaries first, context visibility second.
Most agents guess what is in context. Manna Code has a context browser so you can inspect, pin, and trim what the model sees before it burns tokens. Thread stays on your machine. Desktop free forever at https://t.co/5QVCRn30wJ. You only pay the model vendor.
@gabrielgtapps Nice tip. Visible spend per session beats surprise invoices. We surface session spend in the agent while you work - https://t.co/5QVCRn30wJ
Most coding agents hide what a run costs until the invoice lands.
Manna Code shows session spend while you work. Desktop is free forever. You pay the model vendor (bring the OpenAI or Grok plan you already have, or BYOK). Keys stay in the OS credential manager. Manna never sees them.
https://t.co/8iNBXtYFNR
@null_founder Local compute and a local-first harness are related but different. An agent on your machine, with your keys, still matters when the model moves on-device.
Most coding tools force one loop for everything. Manna Code has two modes on one desktop agent. Analyst for files, spreadsheets, Python, charts, and the web. Code for planning-first edits with parallel tools and subagents. Same local thread. Desktop free forever at https://t.co/8iNBXtYFNR. You only pay the model vendor.
@tweetangelc I think the real dividing line is ownership. If the tool runs locally and you bring the model plan, the economics stay closer to software you own than another monthly seat.
@agentnative_@flutlancer@rileybrown Nice. The other advantage of a local coding agent is that Codex can work from the repo and git state already on your machine, without first uploading the codebase.
@StartupHakk@SwePalm@emollick Exactly. The local-first part matters because the coding agent can work against the repo that is already there, not a copy uploaded to someone else's stack.
@DenisPitcher Love this use case. A local agent doing the machine setup keeps the workflow private and avoids turning a side project into another hosted bill.
@rwtest That split between planning and coding is compelling. I like keeping the agent close to the repo too, so it can inspect the real files and git state instead of requiring a cloud upload first.
Your coding agent should not be another subscription. Desktop is free forever. Bring the OpenAI or Grok plan you already pay for, or BYOK. You pay the model vendor. We never see your keys. Local threads on your machine. https://t.co/5QVCRn3ymh
Cloud coding agents often need your repo uploaded somewhere else first. Manna Code runs on your machine. The agent sees the local files and git state. Your codebase stays put. Desktop free forever at https://t.co/5QVCRn30wJ. You only pay the model vendor.
@VampireGurlAI@grok Session lifecycle failures are why chats should live in a local DB you own. Same thread, same machine, no mystery owner. Desktop free forever at https://t.co/5QVCRn3ymh
@Oluwaphilemon1 Long-running coding sessions need continuity that survives close and reopen. Keep the thread on your machine, pause mid-run, pick up where you left. Local-first desktop agent at https://t.co/5QVCRn3ymh
@N0V4Dev Searchable agent transcripts and checkpoints belong on your machine. Local DB, keys in the OS credential manager, history that never silently compact. Desktop free forever at https://t.co/5QVCRn3ymh
Analyst for files, Python, charts, and web. Code for plan, parallel tools, and pause mid-run. Same local thread on your machine. Desktop free forever. You pay the model vendor. https://t.co/5QVCRn3ymh