Married Vet, Math background. I provide 1-1 coaching/based therapy yielding you joy & confidence. Eyes On The Prize | Prov. 28:1 Make Therapy Great Again
🌅Marchese Methods🌅
Good fren here BETSY with an EPIC testimonial for the BASTE THERAPY I provide. Grateful for this and to have her as a client!
A remarkable highlight for her and my clients that are women, who are unironically impressive in their courage and willingness to grow. Yes, you read that right, I have WOMEN clients who are baste and epic actually. More women WELCOME as well, I will change your life and bring you to fulfillment. Being my client as a woman instantly makes you a Stacy btw
If you’re a bro let this testimonial speak to my ability to coach you too. MARCHESE MAXXING IS THE PANACEA
MarcheseMethods(.)com, now offering 90 minute sessions as well as 60, with package deals.
Cannot recommend my homie @MarcheseMethods enough. Had one session with him and had clarity on the next 6 months of my life. It was actually unbelievable.
Women especially. If you’re looking for a therapist, you probably don’t need therapy culture/speak. You need this guy.
“If yew tayke away *my* thsoshul thsecuwritee I’m a fwreekawreeno Demokwat fouwr da furthst tyme in my wife😤✌️”
Boomers didn’t work hard. There’s nothing tough about them, nothing adult about them. They are the original Coombrain Id Slaves, fat drug addict alcoholic toddler pigs. With their disgusting bulging guts.
“Every penny he put into it” oh okay so the roughly 5k across his entire lifetime, paid out in the first two months of him receiving social security. 5% interest expected too lmao what a baby.
Social security aside — which is a retirement plan for stupid people who don’t save their money and need to be forced to — your job is to stop getting so reactive to boomers.
Most of the boomers vs us thing is another high school cafeteria ego tough guy game. Everything boomers say is essentially “I’m tougher and more masculine than you.” You know they’re not entitled to feel that way because they’re coomers, which is an injustice, but you also feel what they say and their existence as *taking* masculinity from you. You believe them, which has made you so reactive.
Them thinking that takes nothing from you. Them thinking that doesn’t imply you have to think that too. Most of your problem here entails tying up your sense of worth and masculinity on externals like money made and assets owned. You know that’s inaccurate, so who cares if boomers prance around telling you what a PUSSY you are. You need them to think otherwise because you can’t trust yourself to think otherwise. You are not grounded in daily action, consequently boomers occupy space in your head.
If you HAVE to say something, just interrogate what they say. “What makes you so sure I buy expensive coffees?” And so on. “According to what am I not working hard”.
You know they’re retarded. The boomer question is solved.
Bonus on the coffees in QT
Again. If we examine where people really are spending too much money it’s alcohol and drugs, but these “bootstrap” dorks don’t want to get into that because it’d implicate their own behavior, and using that would imply it’s not a necessity, deconstructing their cope excuses for alcohol and drugs like “muh fun”.
Boomers be like:
Erm. When I was a kid I aykshually had to hunt and forage for food starting at 4 years old in 20 feet of snow with no clothes. Then I would walk to school in that snow at 2:30am because I only slept 10 minutes every day. Then at home my parents would saw my limbs off to teach me discipline. Hueh, snowflake
All of them are scrawngroid blobs of adipose tissue btw. HELL YEAH BAP NIETZSCHEAN VITALISM and they’re that guy that shows up 3x a week at the gym for 20 minutes but still looks the same for years.
“Nick parrots BAP ideas!”
No he doesn’t, doesn’t even say the same things, and if he did, two different people can independently think the same thing
By the way, when *I* make this point, it’s in the baste analytical not excusing their whorishness and not implying it’s an external force they’re listening to way. When *I* make this point it’s about retard felt heuristic rationalization and self-sabotage, and it doesn’t imply there’s an absence of just being a whore, and it doesn’t imply that every time a woman goes back to a “rapist” it means it actually was “rape”, and not a good indicator she was likely full of shit.
In fact, this “taking” idea more likely implies it was a croque of shit, meaning that it was more so she felt cheated out of an interpsychic deal rather than some violent traumatizing experience.
In the case that it was violent and traumatizing, they can still resolve to do the *take it back* thing, but it’ll be with other men, and men who emulate greater safety in fact rather than emulate the rapist.
I make this point basedly, women make this point copely
While there is the "LOL SHE KEPT CONTACT" as le "women aykshually like it" point, they often keep contact or even try to have sex with "their" rapist as a way to "take" their sexuality back through "controlling" the sex & "having it" on their terms 1/2
🔬Marchesian Analysis🔬
On The Sisterhood Meaning Solipsisthood
Lucy Craig choosing “gangbang” as the word for it all pretty much sums it up, especially with what seems to be an effort to *console him* and cover for all the frat chads.
That said, notice that the entire thing really becomes a problem with The Sisterhood not Sisterhooding for her so much.
One might wonder about this, or chaulk it up to standard issue foid inconsistency. While it’s logically and ideologically inconsistent, it’s very consistent with their actual loyalty and ideology: themselves and their own feelsies.
Hence, when women come together under the banner of Sisterhood, it’s naturally more so self serving for each one of them. Partly this is normative and okay, all dealmaking operates with this.
It goes wrong when their barometer for the sisterhood is their precious little feelings, and they bring their solipsism. Their solipsism makes for them to identify “women” or “sisters” as another word for “me”. Other women don’t really exist to them, they’re like cute pets, an extension of themselves. Hence when it’s “support women” uttered by Stacy and Brittany, Stacy is saying “support Stacy”, Brittany is saying “support Brittany”, Stacy THINKS Brittany is saying “support Stacy”, and Brittany thinks Stacy is saying “support Brittany. The “deal” is only slightly present and inescapable, my support for your support.
“Support” therein means “makes me feel good”. This is not well defined, and works on an on-the-fly calculation. Moreover, per their little survival brains, they try to extract as much support as possible while giving as little as possible.
So when Lucy Craig gets gangbanged, they all feel double justified in attacking her. First and foremost because she hurt their feelings by lowering reproductive chances by cheapening sex. She forced them to compete by *giving* more sex, a big Nono as they all try to give less sex for more male essence. Lizard brain no likey.
Secondly, that “deal” comes up, where for each sorority member’s little solipsistic world she hurt them in all their little commensurate ways. They all then think they’re talking about the same thing again, but Stacy is talking about how Lucy hurt Stacy, Brittany about Brittany, you know the rest.
The “deal” vaguely gives them moralf_(a)_g sense, where they can consciously rationalize it’s about betrayal or whatever. Finally: they can “violate” the sisterhood rule because Lucy “violated” it by offending Stacy, Brittany, Chelsea, et al., respectively and in their own individual little pathologies.
Rape isn’t always violent. Rape is also when a woman texts you for weeks, consistently acts horny, tells you she wants to fuck you, says everything you want to hear, and deliberately creates the expectation of genuine desire. You finally take her out on a date — then she immediately loses interest, ghosts you, and disappears.
Women evolved to place their survival above all else, including their own children, to make up for their physical discrepancy. Their precious little foidnugget feelings inform whether they’re doing so successfully with good feelings for survival vs bad feelings for threat.
Those feelings weigh more heavily into their decision-making process, and are faster and even more heuristic.
These instincts are now obsolete, and didn’t evolve a very strong check on overindulging them. E.g., post-industrialization people got fat because they didn’t have to physically toil for their food, but our brains still think we do, so we eat way too much more than we burn, which also applied the heuristic of “get ahead”.
Amidst indulging them we also feel guilt, an evolved check but also a transcendental soul feeling. Women detect this as another negative feeling that’s death-adjacent, and they ameliorate it with rationalization. They COULD ameliorate with just doing the good and right things, but that’d defeat the purpose because it comes with the discomfort of metabolizing calories. Lizard brain no likey because that’s not “getting ahead” and risks depleting energy down to death.
Their most prominent rationalization is Feminislam ™, a religion where just by being a woman they are a deity. Since they’re deities they’re infallible, moral, so all indulgence is “BASTE” Aykshually, guilt be gone. They feel especially good about this because their grounding for it is hunter gatherer feelings and sexual utility. The evolved preprogrammed morality that is all things pursuant to survival and reproduction (really more so sex) are “good”, and that’s informed by feelings, bolstering the “goodness” of their cooming. Essentially it’s not just a valid and arbitrary assignment of deityhood, they’re citing utility, and strengthen it further by halfass cope rationalizing that they are the decision-makers of reproduction with sex. It’s their magic deity superpower, and since sex is the top teleology they are thereby deities.
In the end they essentially worship themselves and their neurotransmitters. Now, with this setup, we have children offending their precious pseudo morality. Children are a responsibility, require metabolized calories, discomforts, daring to demand such from her womanness. Both by existence and interpsychic forces, combined with women’s low tolerance and underdevelopment, we have them essentially inflicting pain on women.
This makes them THE enemy. They betray her entitlement to coommaxx at all times. How dare they ask a deity to reduce herself to the torture of microwaving Dino nuggies when she wants to get drunk and suck cock. Over enough time or enough cope, they literally consider their children a MORAL evil figure likened to Satan, which seeds the justification to end their lives to stop the EVIL they’re doing of wanting to play hide and seek when she wants to go get gangbanged.
Women end their children’s lives because they think they’re entitled to endless, eternal, maximized pleasure for the cost of no displeasure
Women don’t have magic psychology intuition powers and are always completely off on anything that isn’t surface level because they cannot for the life of them resort to constructing rational causal chain analysis.
They *feel* like they have these powers, because they build upon their false axioms of *their own feelings* both as the model and barometer. This is like the x plugged into the f(x), and the f(x)s are usually false teleologies and heuristic axioms of pseudo logic.
These f(x)s include:
- Projection: "If I were to do what he is doing it'd be because my feeling a, therefore he's feeling a"
- Pathology: "That makes me feel unsafe, which means I am in fact unsafe"
- Low IQ Insentient Hunter Gatherer Morality: "What feels good is good, what feels bad is bad" which also comes with a secondary appraisal of the faster it feels good the gooder it is.
These are r*tarded per the following:
1. This does not apply a global causality to anything because it relies on how *she* chooses to respond and feel with no regard for differences in this like in maturity, or different teleologies.
Something like a man yelling or getting angry falls under this category, where she "gets scared" because she presumes the only possible reason you would yell or get angry is le ✨out of control✨, because it betrays kindergarten cooperation and play nice ethics, with a sprinkle of blaspheming the Holy Trinity of the mother, the daughter, and the holy vagina. How dare you speak to her as if you're not beneath her, and how dare you insert the slightest bit of discomfort. It's in your best interest to cooperate and play nice, because her mammal brain makes her feel that way.
2. Women eternally conflate ego pathology safety with emotional safety. Ego pathology safety usually just winds up being them reading any negative feeling or discomfort as le "unsafe", even if they're necessary for growth. Children feel unsafe on their first day of school because it's slightly out of their comfort zone. Under eternal female juvenilism, they essentially never go to their first day of school. Born of femtarded worship, hunter gatherer teleology, and of eternal rationalized self-sabotage pathology. Most prominently with a dork like this, what "causes her to be guarded" is likely something that deconstructs her currently constructed self-sabotage self-protection mechanisms. E.g., women who are low self esteem and use sex and control over the supply of it as value will sperg out at the sight of attractive muscular chads because he strips her of that power due to her helplessness to want to have sex with him. It tears away their lies they've told themselves to force confrontation with who they actually are, which is someone they deem as low value, but mostly due to false frames like hunter gatherer utility and id indulgence over super ego alignment. She hates herself for not being her ideal self, and exercising discipline.
3. Feelsie goodsie morality overlooks firstly long term feelsies, but also is fundamental insentience that cuts off access to rationalism. A dork subsumed by this cannot operate outside their own feelings and means to peak pleasure, comfort, and survival. Consequently, they cannot infer a causal chain and wind up resorting to projection as above.
It's all evident in her use of “I feel like” instead of I think, suspect, surmise, posit, especially for such a smarty pants always dealing with hypotheses and spreadsheets.
Always such a delight when the spreadsheet geniuses who demand a source for everything you say resorts to feelsies and vibes for what they say, which further tells you they do not live in the actual world. They LARP empiricism or whatever but once again rely on their feelings and where they're assigned. It feels smart to be le empiricist and OWN you on that, but it also feels good to not be and pretend to have some magic celestial pseudo smartypants psychology vibes powers, hence they're not contradictory.