Maria M

[🍁Dr. Tim Goyetche ND🍁 @WitchDrTim]

The only New Year's drink that I'll be drinking. :-) Hot water clove bud extracts, fresh from a triple extract, and triple only because I was too lazy to bottle it after the second heating process. LOL PS. You don't even need to do it a second time. LOL I'm just a little extra sometimes. LOL

Again, here's how to make it, because every time I post about it, people ask for the recipe: https://t.co/LF5rYFDaCm

PPS. Ignore the amounts to take; you can take up to 900 mL per day for the average adult. And you don't need to take prebiotics; they'll actually help balance your intestinal flora. This is based on new information from clinical studies and trials.

[🍁Dr. Tim Goyetche ND🍁 @WitchDrTim]

UPDATED: Mined Salt & Sea Salts Are Pure Poison
AND I HAVE BROUGHT THE RECEIPTS!
I WILL NOT DEBATE OR ARGUE THIS!

Well, a lot has changed since I first started talking about this about 10 years ago, but one thing that hasn’t changed is that so many people have been convinced that these toxic salts are somehow healthy. And boy oh boy, talking about the toxicity of salt is like being blasphemous to far too many people, even though the evidence is indisputable.

When I first presented this more than 10 years ago, the pushback was extreme and unrelenting; however, even the likes of Dr. Mercola and Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, wrote stories about just how toxic Himalayan salt is, but then forgot about all that as soon as they found out how much money they could make from selling it. They might sell out, but I won’t.

When I first presented this, there were research scientists, doctors, etc., all of whom told me I was full of crap, that it wasn’t true, and that they were going to do a spectral analysis on their salt themselves and present it to the people. So, I challenged them to do so. And there were a lot of them! All but one returned and apologized, indicating that the information I presented was accurate.

Even here in 2025, Peer-Reviewed Science, Mamavation, and https://t.co/7nxXH9Mrfc have done deep dives into researching the toxicity of mined salts.

Wait, we aren’t done yet! Let’s talk about the unstable radioactive isotopes in mined salts. While there’s a big push to distract from the radioactive elements, here is a peer-reviewed
Department of Physics, College of Education, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq, tested 35 retail salt products, and you are NOT going to like what they found!
https://t.co/oQrKjtUBqJ

Mamavation, a Nonprofit Health Advocacy Group, focuses only on lead because there are no listed safe limits for mercury for anything other than fish products, and none for aluminum at all, according to the Codex or the FDA. They had over 30 brands of mined salts third-party tested, and found 78% of them had highly toxic levels of lead. Ref: https://t.co/NNvzC0RVsp

https://t.co/7nxXH9Mrfc conducted an AI deep dive in 2025 to let AI find the truth, and they went further, even acknowledging the radioactive isotopes and that regular table salt is the safest.
Ref: https://t.co/m9NFD9vVhc

A ridiculous charade within our community of natural health and living has been playing out for years. Too many people have been buying into outright lies. The facts are hidden right in front of their eyes, in hopes that nobody pays attention to them, or they simply haven't done their due diligence and are just believing what others are telling them.

WHY IS THIS SUCH A HUGE PROBLEM

BECAUSE 82% OF THE WORLD’S POPULATION TESTED AS SURPASING THE MERCURY TOXICITY THRESHOLD. This is according to the Biodiversity Research Institute of Maine (BRI), the world's foremost expert on environmental mercury.

Reference: https://t.co/LdNOhqi2Vt

Before all the detractors, cynics, and armchair warriors start trying to defend their salt lamps or Himalayan salt, I'll tell you right now that scientists, naturopathic doctors, and others have already tried to call me out on this and had their own spectral analyses done of salt lamps and Himalayan salt. Every one of them found that they were highly toxic. If you're looking to argue with me on this, you'll lose because I'm about to bury you in indisputable evidence from the suppliers and manufacturers of these products. The first thing you need to understand is what the safe levels are for these toxic metals in our drinking water. You also need to realize that 80% of it will be cleared through digestive processes, rather than off-gassed by Himalayan salt lamps, which give you 100%.

Supplementing your water with unrefined salt under the currently listed protocols of ¼ teaspoon per glass, twice daily, will result in ridiculously high levels of toxic metals being consumed.

Ref: https://t.co/5H3bL8SbCH

Now, let’s look at some certificates of analysis from unrefined salt producers!

CELTIC SEA SALT > CURE ZONE DATA
Let’s look at the corruption that’s now going on within the salt industry! And there may be no better example of that than Cure Zone, which recommends ¼ teaspoon of Celtic sea salt in a glass of water twice daily, with claims that it will cure pretty much everything.
Reference: https://t.co/A4NaF4PPOx

In the last few years, they have changed how they present the facts to try to confuse you. They won’t talk about mercury at all, but they will talk about aluminum, and they talk about 0.11 mg per quarter teaspoon, which they want you to put in water twice per day.
The recommended amount of aluminum in drinking water is set at 0.1 mg/l, which is 0.1 ppm.

Their claim of 0.11 mg per quarter teaspoon equates to 167 ppm, and that’s what they want you to put in your water and to drink it twice per day.

Note: They do not even list cadmium, lead, or mercury. They also do not list the typical eight or nine unstable radioactive isotopes in crude salt.

HIMALAYAN CPINK CRYSTAL SALT > THE MEADOW DATA
Now let’s take a look at the Meadow, a seller and producer of Himalayan pink crystal salt!
Reference: https://t.co/yEITkhtCf0

Aluminum: 0.661 PPM (operational guideline 0.1 ppm)
Cadmium: 0.01 ppm (maximum safe limit 0.007 ppm)
Lead: 0.1 PPM (maximum safe limit 0.005 ppm)
Mercury: <0.03 ppm (they won’t disclose it!) (maximum safe limit 0.001 ppm)

Please don’t forget about the eight or nine cancer-causing, unstable radioactive isotopes!

SEA SALT > REDMOND’S ANCIENT SEA SALT DATA
Redmond's ancient sea salt, an animal product. Still, unless they are refining it heavily, this is probably what's really in Redmond's salt. And before we even get into the analysis, Redmond’s clearly states with no alternative context that their salt product is unrefined, mined salt. But magically, the unrefined animal-product salt and the salt for human consumption differ in their toxic metal content.
Ref: https://t.co/uiceQyrCii

They don't want to disclose the mercury levels in their salt that comes from the most toxic state in the USA.

Aluminum density: 215 ppm (operational guideline is 0.1 ppm)
Cadmium: 0.27 ppm (maximum safe amount is 0.01 ppm)
Lead: 0.6 ppm (maximum safe amount is 0.005 ppm)

Again, this is not even to talk about the cancer-causing, unstable radioactive isotopes that are listed. And we can’t talk about mercury, because they are avoiding it.

SALT COMPANIES TRYING TO TRICK YOU:

Selina Naturally – Celtic Salt
https://t.co/baWV4GJKYq
They will not list any heavy metal data except for aluminum. Then they attempt to trick you by listing percentages instead of parts per million, like everyone else. And all they are telling you is there is less than 500 ppm of aluminum in their product because that’s what .05% equates to.
Salt of the Earth Sea Salt
https://t.co/O2MN1CNKd9
In-house testing only. Not third-party analysis. And they don’t want to talk about aluminum at all, while claiming mercury levels are lower than those of every other sea salt that exists, at the same time claiming it is unrefined sea salt. That is impossible!

Redmond – Real Salt Consumer Product
https://t.co/gbS4odwQLq
Once again, using percentages instead of parts per million and expecting us to accept what they have to say instead of getting third-party testing done. Once again, they will only identify a concentration below 500 ppm, even though the FDA indicates that safe limits are 0.03 ppm.

WHAT SALT DO I USE? NONE! I EAT REAL FOOD!

What salt do I consume? I do not own a salt shaker! I eat organic meat, which I do season but not with salt, and fresh organic fruits and vegetables. But if I did, I would be consuming, on my food only, and very lightly, common table salt, which the unrefined salt industry has convinced the world that it is nasty. It’s not!
If those unrefined salt producers refined and removed the toxic metals and the radioactive elements, I would be writing something very different right now. I would be recommending it! And they can do it!
However, let's talk about iodized table salt, which is sodium chloride with a natural iodine bond.

We are told in our community to oppose it because of the anti-caking agent and ammonium bleaching. But ammonia is a natural element that occurs in the human body and is flashed off long before the products ever hit the market. Meanwhile, anti-caking agents are acceptable for use in all organic foods, and they are currently used in organic foods. There is no problem with table salt. And yes, I know that there is one online influencer who found a single brand of table salt from New Zealand or Australia that was heavy metal toxic. Which means they didn’t refine it the way table salt is supposed to be refined.

CORRUPTION OF THE HEALTH AUTHORITIES AND FOOD REGULATORS!

They are now hiding the severity of heavy metal toxicity in their salt products. Most unrefined salt producers no longer offer access to a certificate of analysis. This has significantly changed.

Another thing that has changed dramatically is that Health Authorities in Canada and the USA are widely increasing the safe levels of toxic metals in drinking water.

If you believe that federal health authorities in North America are making any attempt to protect the people of our countries, I’m going to show you data, and while all of it can’t be recovered with https://t.co/gBGe1vCd10, much of it can.

Ref: https://t.co/SeyOg4DiXT

Versus……

https://t.co/5H3bL8SbCH

2018 aluminum safe level: NONE (maximum)
2025 aluminum safe level: 2.9 ppm (maximum)
When did we learn that any amount of aluminum was safe?
2018 cadmium safe level: 0.005 ppm
2025 cadmium safe level: 0.01 ppm
20 times the safe level of cadmium is now considered safe.
2018 lead safe level: 0.005 ppm
2025 lead safe level: 0.01 ppm
again, 20 times the current safe level of lead is now considered safe.
While Health Canada maintains safe levels of mercury at 0.001 ppm, salt producers and regulators have now increased it to 0.3, meaning regulators now think that 300 times the amount of mercury is suddenly safe in drinking water. I don’t believe that for a moment.
*For reference, see the citations above.
Do you really think that your health authorities and food regulators are looking out for you and are acting in the best interest of your health?

FINALLY: LET’S TALK ABOUT SALT ADDICTION
Salt consumption is proven to stimulate dopamine release, and when you lower the amount of salt that you consume, versus what you have typically consumed, salt cravings occur.

Further, withdrawal symptoms from lowering salt consumption are the same as other drugs, while they may not last as long, or be as severe, the symptoms are the same.

Lastly, salt addiction meets 7 of the 11 criteria used in the DSM-V psychiatric manual for an addiction diagnosis. Only two criteria need to be met in order for an addiction diagnosis to be made.
References:
https://t.co/WlAZ5EIuQ5
https://t.co/j2JIksXkDy
https://t.co/3ka7PQBmA3
https://t.co/9lE30Sna5V
https://t.co/K2NYSEKPAk
https://t.co/uI0OLKXjSZ

In closing, the evidence of heavy metal toxicity is overwhelming for unrefined mined salts. It can’t be denied or disputed. And thus, because I know people are going to crawl out of the woodwork to attack this as they have so many times before, without ever reading the evidence, I won’t be responding to anyone.

The proof is here. It comes from the producers, it comes from widespread third-party testing, it comes from peer-reviewed science, it comes from government agencies, and it has come from my detractors in the past, who have also tried to prove me wrong by paying to have their own spectral analysis done and finding the same results.

I won’t debate with you. I have debated this with people for over 12 years, and nobody, and I literally mean nobody, has been able to prove it wrong yet. That includes scientists, lab techs, doctors, university professors, and so many other people who told me I was crazy.

I know what’s going to follow; I’ve heard all of the excuses for people to justify it. None of them has been valid! What you put in your body is your business. I’m not going to judge you; I’m just going to present you with the truth as I have here, and hopefully you will research it in an unbiased manner, using science rather than online influencers, social media memes, and YouTube videos from unknown people. I won’t even entertain it.

And if you come in hot, you’re going to leave cold. I will block you. I won’t play around. I’ve already been through this many times. And the facts are the facts, whether they offend you or not.
I really hope you take the time to do your research and then make an informed decision on what you will do from this point forward, if you didn’t already know this. That’s the greatest wish I have for all of you: that you make informed decisions. :-)

[Dr. Dennis Walker @drdenwalker]

Know this:

[🇩🇰 @Nikolajlaesoee]

Hva så, Coronapas-tilhængere?

Stadig fan af... Lockdown-Mette? Stadig imod X? Har I fået sat jer ind i Twitter Files? Får demonstranter en undskyldning? Os, der blev kaldt anti-vax. Der forlod Facebook i 2020. Der gik på gaden.

Folk skulle skamme sig.

[Dr Aseem Malhotra @DrAseemMalhotra]

Why is this not headline news across the world ?!

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

COVID VACCINE CATASTROPHE

New study published 18th December 2024 confirms the worst fears.

The covid vaccines were a huge gamble because there was no long term safety data.

And the data now confirms that that gamble was a catastrophic error.

For while this new study found a 4 to 8% decrease in the risk of death for those vaccinated in the medium term, in the longer term, the risk of death was 69 to 94% higher for the vaccinated.

So for a negligible benefit against Covid, after one year the benefit was reversed and the vaccinated showed a substantially greater risk of death.

The study’s authors suggest that "the Covid 19 vaccines
may have an indirect effect on the immune system" and the effects "could contribute to an increased risk of death from other causes over time."

https://t.co/xjX2akwoyZ

The Covid vaccines should be immediately pulled off the market.

And those that lined up to be injected, based upon politicians promises of "safe & effective" should be absolutely furious.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

THIS IS WHY they’re AFRAID of RFK. The CDC held Secret Meetings about the Rise of Autism DUE TO Vaccinations…

“So they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days…and there was a 10,000% increase…”

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

When people find out that the illnesses are coming from the ‘cure’…prepare for ANGER…like you���ve never seen before.

[Dr Aseem Malhotra @DrAseemMalhotra]

BREAKING 💥

‘Doctor tapped by Trump for key health role reveals plan to end bigger killer than cancer’
‘In addition to his ideas on the food supply, Dr Malhotra also wants to 'immediately pause or suspend' the rollout of Covid vaccines due to concerns about their side effects’

https://t.co/FiioGUxShe

[Ben Smith @bensmithlive]

The world’s richest man built the entire healthcare system to keep you sick.

He transformed healing into a profit-driven machine—and buried natural medicine in the process.

This man is John D. Rockefeller.

And here is the dark story of how he did it: 🧵

[Prof. Peter C Gøtzsche @PGtzsche1]

Mammography screening: The greatest hoax. Read the update of my 2012 book for free: https://t.co/5qpI5Ma300 Breast screening has been sold to the public with the message that it saves lives and breasts. It does neither. Mammography screening is harmful and should be stopped.

[Klaus K @KlausKblog]

Er det sandt, hvad Robert Kennedy fortæller, Christine ...? @StabellBenn

[Prof. Peter C Gøtzsche @PGtzsche1]

Screening for breast cancer with mammography has been sold to the public with the claims that it saves lives and saves breasts. It does neither and increases mastectomies. In the public interest, we have uploaded our updated review as a preprint https://t.co/KOEVhWmuE3

[Elliot Overton @EO_Nutrition]

This ingredient is found in 99% of the supplements you take

Experts claim it is "safe"

and most supplement companies use it because it makes the manufacturing process faster and cheaper.

The additive is called Sillicon Dioxide. As a supplement/food additive, it is otherwise known as E551, or SAS (synthetic amorphous silica)

During processing, it can yield nanoparticles as small as 10 nanometers

Most of the studies demonstrating safety do not account for nanoparticles of this size

Recent studies looking at silicon dioxide nanoparticles show:

- Neurotoxicity
- Disruption of the gut-brain axis
- Intestinal Inflammation
- Immunotoxicity and suppression
- Accumulation in organs such as the liver & spleen
- Increased sensitivity/loss of oral tolerance to dietary antigens like gluten

Although it is more difficult, supplements CAN be manufactured without this ingredient. As the owner of a supplement company, I can tell you this for a fact.

So try your best to avoid this ingredient wherever possible, because it might be causing problems in the long run.

[Dr. Dennis Walker @drdenwalker]

Magnesium and Usage:
Glycinate: Insomnia/sleep anxiety, stress

Bisglycinate: leg cramps

L-threonate: Neurological issues/ ADHD, dementia, anxiety

Malate: Chronic pain, fatigue

Taurate: Cardiovascular function (improve blood sugar &blood pressure levels)

Orotate: cardiovascular support

Magnesium Oxide: Best for migraine:

Magnesium Citrate; Best for constipation, mood swings (may improve anxiety), for night leg cramps& depression

Magnesium malate: fibromyalgia &chronic fatigue syndrome

I use magnesium glycinate

[Larry Cook @stopvaccinating]

VITAMIN K 101 - DO NOT DO IT!
Vitamin K is not “just a vitamin.” There are two main brands given in US hospitals.

Brand #1 contains Benzyl Alcohol as its main preservative. Newborns are injected with 9 mg of benzyl alcohol. What does alcohol do to the system? Alcohol is a central nervous system depressant.

It causes feelings of drunkenness, sleepiness, lack of desire to eat, respiratory depression and decreased O2 sats, and decreased heart rate.

So, as soon as a baby is born, we get them to where they are so drugged up that they are too sleepy to learn how to properly feed , and then stress the exhausted mother out by making her try and try and try...so she feels defeated and like a failure right away.

What else does alcohol do to us? It attacks the liver. So, newborns are given an injection of alcohol, that is toxic to the liver, and then we wonder why there are so many incidences of jaundice???

Brand # 2 contains 10 mg of polysorbate 80. Polysorbate 80 is documented in medical literature to cause premature ovarian failure and infertility. It also opens up the blood-brain-barrier (it is used in cancer treatments for this reason—to get the medicine into the brain).

In Jan 2016, the American College of Pediatrics spoke up about their concern about Gardasil HPV vaccine because it contains 50 mcg of polysorbate 80, and they were concerned on its potential effects on children and teenagers fertility, as it was documented to cause premature ovarian failure.

Gardasil contains 50 mcg polysorbate 80
Vitamin K contains 10 mg polysorbate 80
Vitamin K has 200 times more polysorbate 80 than the Guardasil that the American College of Pediatrics was so concerned about.

HELLO!!! Why are we giving newborns 10 mg of a documented chemical known to destroy fertility and open the brain to potential assault???

Oh, now that the blood-brain-barrier is open, they follow with an injection of Hep B, which has 250 mg aluminum (another medically documented additive which causes neurological damage)!

We can do better for our babies!!!!

Interesting points made about Vitamin K at birth by a brilliant pediatrician who remains anonymous:

"You know what “synthetic vitamin K” enthusiasts don’t understand? The thought that babies (and all animals for that matter) have lower levels of vitamin K at birth for a beneficial, protective, reason. I’m just going to throw these “common sense-based” thoughts out there but let’s consider them:

First, in order to absorb vitamin K we have to have a functioning biliary and pancreas system. Your infant’s digestive system isn’t fully developed at birth which is why we give babies breast milk (and delay solids) until they are at least 6-months-old, and why breast milk only contains a small amount of highly absorbable vitamin K. Too much vitamin K could tax the liver and cause brain damage (among other things). As baby ages and the digestive tract, mucosal lining, gut flora, and enzyme functions develop, baby can process more vitamin K. Low levels of vitamin K at birth just…makes…sense. ???

Secondly, cord blood contains stem cells, which protect a baby against bleeding and perform all sorts of needed repairs inside an infant’s body. Here’s the kicker, in order for a baby to get this protective boost of stem cells, cord-cutting needs to be delayed and the blood needs to remain thin so stem cells can easily travel and perform their functions. Imagine that, baby has his/her own protective mechanism to prevent bleeding and repair organs…that wasn’t discovered until after we started routinely giving infants vitamin K injections.

Third, a newborn might have low levels of vitamin K because it’s intestines are not yet colonized with bacteria needed to synthesize it and the “vitamin K cycle” isn’t fully functional in newborns. It makes sense then to bypass the gut and inject vitamin K right into the muscle right? Except baby’s kidneys aren’t fully functional either.

Fourth, babies are born with low levels of vitamin K compared to adults, but this level is still sufficient to prevent problems; vitamin K prophylaxis isn’t necessarily needed.

Finally, several clinical observations support the hypothesis that children have natural protective mechanisms that justify their low vitamin K levels at birth. I don’t know about you, but we should probably figure out why that is before we “inject now and worry about it later.”

Do you know why vitamin K is pushed on parents and their children? Because pharmaceutical companies don’t like to lose money, doctors don’t like to be questioned, the American Academy of Pediatrics dare not change its recommendations."

"Since 1985, the medical profession has known that oral vitamin K raises blood levels 300 - 9,000 times higher. The injectable vitamin K, results in vitamin K levels 9,000 times thicker than adults blood!!!

Baby's blood thickened with vitamin K, causes a situation where stem cells have to move through sludge, not nicely greased blood vessels full of blood which can allow stem cells easy acess to anywhere. Maybe one day it will dawn on the medical profession that not only are cord blood stem cells important and useful to the newborn baby, but that stem cells need thin blood for a reason."

"Any fetus which gets being wrung out like a wet towel while travelling down a narrow drain pipe, can incur damage in any part of the body, including in the brain, and needs an in-built fix-it. And stem cells cross the brain blood barrier. In fact, stem cells can go ... anywhere!!! Amazing don't you think. God's design has solutions for situational problems. Three solutions, actually. The second is the fact that naturally, in the first few days, a baby's blood clotting factors are lower than normal.

But ... pediatricians consider this a ... "defect" ... so want to give vitamin K which results in blood nearly 100 times thicker than an adult's. This vitamin K injection, so they say ... (like they say immediate cord clamping is safe, and normal, and delayed cord clamping is an unproven intervention) ... is because the baby wasn't designed right, and if you don't give a vitamin K injection, the baby "could bleed to death".

It's not for nothing that the vitamin K syringe, sits right alongside that cord clamp and the scissors!

But there is an unanswered question:
"Why are blood clotting factors in babies low in the first few days after birth? Why has a baby got much thinner blood as a result?"

Might a logical hypothesis be, that thinner blood allows freer and quicker access of cord blood stem cells to any part of the body damaged during birth? After all, why should stem cells have to fight through a baby's blood which is now 100 times thicker than any adult's, courtesy of another needle?"

God did not make a mistake. There is a reason babies are born with lower Vit. K than adults. It gradually increases until by Day 8, baby’s blood has “normal” Vit. K levels.

Yes, share widely, comment, and never give a newborn that dangerous vitamin K shot that even has a blackbox warning on it!!!

[Mike Donio @MikeDonio]

In case you don't know...

I am a senior scientist who stood up and declined to take the "vaccine".

My approximately 20-year career as a researcher, most of which was in pharma and biotech, was permanently derailed Oct of 2021.

Since then, I’ve been fighting back. Have been given the opportunity to share the truth including numerous (>40) interviews on podcasts, radio shows, and more.

Have also started a community of scientific truth-tellers @scientists4HF and launched a new resource to make science more approachable @ScienceDefined

I’m so grateful for all of the support I've received. I feel very blessed.

It's been one heck of a journey and I'm just getting started.

[Ken @kenkin100]

Irish farmers have had enough and are mobilising in a secret location. Any guesses as to where they're headed?

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

We were exposed to the sun for hundreds of thousands of years and were doing just fine until sunscreen was invented in 1938. Since then, melanoma rates began to skyrocket in the 1950s, yet people blame the sun rather than the toxic chemicals in sunscreen.

These not only bake into your skin but are also absorbed into your bloodstream. If parts per million can destroy coral reefs, imagine what these toxins can do to your own tissues.

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

This is one of the biggest stories the TV isn't telling you.

You can reduce your risk of cancer, the #2 killer in the world, by 60%, according to findings from a recent study.

How? Three simple interventions:

#1 - Supplement with Vitamin D

#2 - Supplement with omega-3 fatty acids

#3 - Implement a simple home exercise program into your life

A 60 percent reduction in cancer risk is absolutely astounding. So, why is this information not making headlines? Because the healthier you are, the less money there is to be made.