Marie Janicke

[Vivify Mariposa @interesante161]

This article is not about the fairy tale version of history.

It is about the structure underneath:
conflict
finance
maritime control
invisible leverage
money
If you still think empire ended, read this.

The Empire That Never Died: How Britain Used Conflict to Build the Invisible System That Controls Your Money https://t.co/f49h3pLbHg

#Geopolitics #History #Finance #Empire #Power #vivifymariposa

[Stephen Gardner @StephenGardnerX]

LET'S GO!! Trump & Rubio are MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Thanks @PrometheanActn for coming on.

[Promethean Action @PrometheanActn]

Rubio called it "managed decline" — the first sitting Secretary of State to name it out loud.

Then @BarbaraMBoyd shows you the 1975 Trilateral blueprint that built the censorship machine designed to enforce it.

And what Trump is doing to dismantle both.

[Susan Kokinda @sjkokinda]

Had a great time with Tommy Carrigan on his show today. Demolishing Globalism | Susan Kokinda (TPC #1,966) https://t.co/kwvbrRrWJJ via @YouTube

[Tom Luongo @TFL1728]

thanks again to @HealthRanger for the invitation this week. Great time to have this particular chat, even if (especially if) it challenges your current view of how events are unfolding. https://t.co/9obahgxjv2

[Stephen Gardner @StephenGardnerX]

🚨 They say Trump is “out of control” — but the reality is the opposite.

Trump is making strategic moves in Venezuela, working to broker peace, not start another war.
America’s enemies are clearly caught off guard.

@sjkokinda explains the message Trump is sending with these bold moves.

[Russell Brand @rustyrockets]

Please watch this if you’re British and fear war with Russia. It helped me understand why Trump (for all his flaws!) is detested by the UK Deep State. Chilling.

[Marie Janicke @MarieRee180]

@MaxBlumenthal Correct. https://t.co/sOBM6mbRfl

[Marie Janicke @MarieRee180]

@Glenn_Diesen Indivisible security is the key. It seems a simple concept. Domestically, we understand that if we write a law, it should apply to and protect everyone. Why is it such a strange idea to many that international law should do the same?

[Scott Santens @scottsantens]

The results from Germany's 3-year UBI experiment are out!

122 people got €1200/mo for 3 years. All were age 21-40 and employed with €1100-€2600/mo pay.

They were happier, healthier, saved more, gave more, enjoyed more social time and DID NOT WORK LESS than the control group.

[Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen]

The talking point of the week is that Putin can not be trusted and negotiations are therefore not possible, which is a narrative to support a long war
- However, Bill Clinton argued in 2013 that Putin is a man who keeps his word

[Mike Benz @MikeBenzCyber]

Here's Jeffrey Sachs testifying that right after the 2014 overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected government, he was personally flown to Kiev and told as he was walked around the Maidan Square "how the US paid all the money" for the protesters who overthrew the government

[eatmenot @skg331]

@TuckerCarlson We don't have the safety studies to say any vaccine is "safe and effective"

In 2008, Director of NIH Dr Bernadine Healy said EXACTLY what Kennedy has been saying, that they won't do those studies because they're "afraid of what they may find"

[Anna Matson @AnnaRMatson]

𝐀 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐑𝐅𝐊 𝐉𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬

We have a lot of work to do. Please email the senators in your state. There is usually a box you can check to have them reply back to you. Ask them if you can count on them to confirm RFK Jr so we can complete the list.

Once this is done, we have work to do on the maybe people.

[Lord Bebo @MyLordBebo]

🇺🇸🇸🇾🇮🇱

Piers: “Would the US launch a false flag chemical attack?”

Sachs: “Of course it would, are you kidding?”

[Lauren Lee @laurenlee]

Senator Warren received over $1,000,000 in pharmaceutical lobbying dollars during 2019-2020.

Out of the entire Senate, she ranks 2nd for making the most money off of the COVID crisis.

Now she wants you to think RFK Jr. is the enemy. Are we surprised?

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Response to @nytimes hit piece (Part 1) - polio petition to the FDA:

The hit piece begins (and ends) with defending a certain polio vaccine, IPOL, which is not the polio vaccine of old, while playing on fear to distract from the clear safety gaps in licensing this particular product. The hit piece starts with the false claim that I “petitioned the government to revoke its approval of the polio vaccine.” Putting aside that it was actually @ICANdecide's petition, the hit piece never once substantively addresses the reasons for the petition, which, upon reading, is plainly eminently reasonable: https://t.co/6xv0ag2POZ

ICAN’s petition to the FDA seeks to revoke a particular polio vaccine, IPOL, and only for infants and children and only until a proper trial is conducted, because IPOL was licensed in 1990 by Sanofi based on pediatric trials that, according to FDA, reviewed safety for only three days after injection. https://t.co/QCfYadTLLK

This is not “the polio vaccine” developed by Jonas Salk or Albert Sabin that most people think of. It is instead a product based on an entirely new technology, including growing the polio virus on monkey kidney cells whose chromones were modified to cause them to multiply forever, like cancer, and which ends up in the vial of each dose.

As the FDA petition itself explained, with citations: “Moreover, unlike Salk’s vaccine, the virus used in IPOL is ‘grown in vero cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells cultivated on microcarriers.’ Vero cells have modified chromosomes which cause them to multiple forever, like cancer cells. These cells are susceptible to infection by dozens of viruses, including HPV, measles, rubella, reovirus, SV40 virus, and SV-5.” https://t.co/6xv0ag2POZ

And as the FDA approved package insert for IPOL explains: “culture technique and improvements in purification, concentration, and standardization of poliovirus antigen produce a more potent and consistent immunogenic vaccine than the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) available in the US prior to 1988.” https://t.co/TFzohKfOsu

ICAN’s petition, filed in 2022, makes the reasonable request that the FDA, as required by federal law, require a proper clinical trial for IPOL prior to licensure. This was an eminently reasonable request and one the NYT should support and hail. After all, it claims to care about consumer rights and product safety when writing about other consumer products. But clearly not when it comes to the safety of products now injected into babies 29 times in the first year of life, up from 3 injections in 1986. https://t.co/uD46i6MNrx(1983 CDC schedule); https://t.co/pWmpb50q5Q(2025 CDC schedule)

Assuring the safety of these injections is critical. Childhood chronic disease has exploded from less than 13% of children in the 1980s to well over 50% of children today, with most of the explosive rise occurring among immune and immune mediated diseases. https://t.co/j5PUhwudBJ; https://t.co/3d6VL60xqQ; https://t.co/JRVlTEVZZg. It is therefore reasonable to ask for proper clinical trials for childhood vaccines, almost all of which, including IPOL, were licensed between 1986 and today, and which are intended to systemically modify the immune system.

Instead of focusing on the legitimate request in the petition, the hit piece stokes fear by ironically writing that “In 2022, an unvaccinated man New York became paralyzed after contracting polio,” while failing to mention that this person was infected with the vaccine strain of polio, not the wild polio virus. https://t.co/roe7jRUDhD. The last wild case of polio in the United States was in 1979. This hit piece also fails to mention that, as explained by the CDC, “Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) [such as IPOL] is the only polio vaccine that has been given in the United States since 2000” and “IPV�� protects people from polio disease but does not stop transmission of the virus.” https://t.co/tzI83RVvBE; https://t.co/2nPdJO9hTF.

ICAN has also given HHS, and its agencies, including FDA, every opportunity to support the claim IPOL was properly trialed before filing its petition. It had an extensive letter exchange with HHS in 2017-2018 in which HHS could not support the safety of the childhood schedule. https://t.co/PvDSB69Qba. ICAN filed FOIA requests with FDA for the trial reports to support the safety of IPOL and the reports provided were plainly deficient to support safety. https://t.co/6xv0ag2POZ. ICAN also separately carefully evaluated and published regarding the available safety data. https://t.co/3c5rQtp5PT.

In contrast, the NYT hit piece does not cite any actual data or studies, just anecdotes and unsupported assertions. The hit piece's only response regarding the plainly deficient trial to license IPOL (which again was a novel product, using effectively cancerous cells to grow the virus), does not come from FDA, but rather from a Sanofi representative, the company that makes and profits from selling this product. He claims that there supposedly was more data that the FDA relied upon to license this product. But if that’s true, the FDA licensure documents would have been updated to reflect more than three days of safety review after injection and the FDA would have surely produced it in response to ICAN’s polio petition filed in 2022. Neither has happened.

In fact, ICAN already demanded via FOIA that the FDA produce “A copy of the report for each clinical trial relied upon by the FDA when approving IPOL in 1990” and the documents provided in response by FDA make plain ICAN’s petition and safety concern are more than valid, as laid out in ICAN’s petition for the world to read. https://t.co/6xv0ag2POZ. But the NYT reporters writing the hit piece plainly do not care about truth and accuracy.

If the NYT cared about at all about accuracy, the minimum it should do is update its headline from “Kennedy’s Lawyer Has Asked the F.D.A. to Revoke Approval of the Polio Vaccine”, to “ICAN Has Asked the F.D.A. to Revoke Approval for Children of a New Polio Vaccine, Using New Technology, Licensed in 1990, Until it is Properly Trialed for Safety.”

NYT Article: https://t.co/NGda615EDz

[Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald]

The Biden DOJ -- not the Trump DOJ: the Biden DOJ -- intensively investigated possible crimes by Matt Gaetz. After 18 months of leaking to destroy his reputation in the press, the Biden DOJ decided they couldn't even charge him, and closed the case.

Somehow this doesn't matter: