Mario Serna

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@aarteagaa22 @DearS_o_n If this was a conversation we had face to face there would be no mocking. I guarantee that

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@aarteagaa22 @DearS_o_n Not needed

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@messedupfoods It’s your bosses that should be paying. I’m a plumber you don’t see me going around begging for tips. Maybe y’all should go on strike!!

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@askaya We really need to read the scriptures and learn our parts according to God. That would save us from this new age garbage.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@Che_AbdAllah
Yeah, keep coping, you pathetic pedophile defender.
Nobody’s buying your desperate hadith gymnastics and 18+ replies of whataboutism. Even your own side is too ashamed to openly defend a 54-year-old man raping a 9-year-old who was still playing with dolls (Bukhari 5134, 6130, etc.).
The people have already decided: normal humans reject your “perfect example” (Quran 33:21) as disgusting.
We’ll let the public read the hadiths and judge for themselves who’s really enforcing pedophilia in 2026 while worshiping the one true God of the Bible, who condemns sexual immorality and protects the innocent, not the false god whose “prophet” made child rape Sunnah forever.
Your move, warrior of selective outrage. Or just keep running like the coward you are.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@Che_AbdAllah
I’ve seen your 18+ replies. All deflection. Your prophet married Aisha at 6 and consummated at 9 (Sahih Bukhari 5134, 7:62:64, 7:62:88, etc.) while she played with dolls (Bukhari 6130). That’s your “perfect example for all time” (Quran 33:21). Everything else is cope.
Aisha “not a child” because puberty?
A 9-year-old swinging on swings and playing with dolls isn’t mature. Prefrontal cortex (judgment, impulse control) develops into mid-20s. Puberty ≠ adult. “Adolescence is a 20th-century word” is word-game garbage — biology isn’t. Stop gaslighting to defend pedophilia.
Deuteronomy 22:28-29
Na’arah = post-pubescent young woman / marriageable maiden (Talmud Ketubot 39a: ~12 to 12.5, then bogeret). Not a prepubescent “child.” Septuagint “paida” simply means young girl in context. This was one ancient civil restitution law in a brutal tribal society with no welfare: rapist pays massive fine to her father, marries her, never divorces — protecting her from ruin.
Forcible rape = death penalty (Deut 22:25-27). Not “God commands rape of children.” Dishonest smear.
“Church allowed 12-year-olds / no age in Bible”
Ancient life expectancy ~30-40, puberty earlier. Yes, norms were different. But Christianity progressed — higher view of consent, women, monogamy via Jesus. Islam froze Muhammad’s 9-year-old example as Sunnah, still producing child brides in 2026.
Numbers 31:17-18 & 1 Samuel 15:3
Specific, one-time divine judgments on wicked nations:
• Midianites seduced Israel into Baal Peor idolatry/immorality (24,000 dead).
• Amalekites spent centuries genocidally attacking the weak, women, and infants.
Corporate judgment on unrepentant evil cultures (common in ancient world). Virgin girls integrated, not mass-raped. These were limited historical events not eternal commands. Christianity fulfills the Old Testament in grace: “love your enemies.”
Your Islam does this ongoing:
Quran 9:5, 9:29 (fight/subdue), Quran 4:24, 23:5-6 (sex slaves “right hand possesses” forever), Banu Qurayza massacre + enslavement, Muhammad’s own sex slaves. Child marriage, jihad, slavery still happening because his life is the perfect model.
Bottom line:
Bible records harsh ancient one-time judgments. Islam makes Muhammad’s personal conquests, pedophilia, and slavery eternal Sunnah.
You laugh at “innocent children” from 3,000 years ago while defending a prophet whose example destroys children today.
Stop running. Address Aisha at 9, the doll hadiths, Banu Qurayza, and modern Muslim child marriage. Or keep coping with emojis and whataboutism

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@Che_AbdAllah
Cope level: expert. “Adolescence is a 20th-century invention” 😂 while desperately defending a 54-year-old man having sex with a 9-year-old who was still playing with dolls (Sahih Bukhari 6130, etc.).
Yes, the word “adolescence” is modern (coined/popularized by G. Stanley Hall ~1904). But biological and psychological reality isn’t. Human brain development prefrontal cortex for judgment, impulse control, long-term thinking continues into the mid-20s. That’s not “society,” that’s neuroscience. A 9-year-old’s brain is nowhere near mature, even if puberty started. Your prophet’s “perfect example” (Quran 33:21) doesn’t get a pass because “life was short back then.”
Your false equivalence is garbage:
• Biblical na’arah in Deuteronomy 22 = post-pubescent young woman / marriageable maiden (typically 12+ in ancient context, per Talmud and usage). Not a prepubescent 9-year-old. It was civil restitution in a tribal society -fine + mandatory marriage to protect her honor and survival. Actual rape = death penalty.
• Ancient marriages happened earlier due to short lifespans (~30-40 years) and earlier puberty. But the Bible doesn’t hold up any specific child marriage as the eternal perfect role model for all humanity.
Muhammad’s case? Explicitly at 6 (married), 9 (consummated) multiple Sahih Bukhari hadiths. She was small enough to swing on swings and play with dolls after moving in with him. That’s not “ancient norm” that’s your prophet’s personal action, enshrined as Sunnah forever. And it’s why child marriage persists in Muslim countries in 2026.
You mock “presentism” while your entire religion is built on 7th-century Arabian norms as divine perfection. Christianity progressed: higher view of women, consent, monogamy, protection of the vulnerable. Islam froze Muhammad’s example.
A 9-year-old is a child by every sane metric then and now. Stop gaslighting with “no adolescence term” to justify pedophilia. Address the hadiths, the doll-playing, and why your “moral” prophet did what he did.
Or keep laughing while little girls pay the price for your prophet’s Sunnah. Pathetic.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@Che_AbdAllah
Yes or no? Yes, God commanded specific, one-time judgments on utterly depraved nations. Now stop running and answer: Does your “perfect example” (Quran 33:21) command ongoing killing, sex slavery, and child marriage for all time?
Numbers 31:17-18
Midianites seduced Israel into Baal Peor — mass idolatry + sexual immorality that killed 24,000 Israelites (Numbers 25). Those women were complicit. This was targeted vengeance on a specific wicked people who tried to destroy Israel spiritually. Virgin girls spared and integrated (not raped en masse) — ancient mercy in total war. Not a template for today.
1 Samuel 15:3
Amalekites spent centuries cowardly attacking Israel’s weak, stragglers, women, and children (Exodus 17, Deuteronomy 25:17-19). God had warned them for 400 years. This was herem — total devoted judgment on an unrepentant, genocidal enemy, like Sodom. Not “kill random innocents.”
“But the children were innocent!”
In ancient corporate judgment (common in that world), nations reap what their culture sows. God, as Creator, has the right to judge evil societies that would raise the next generation to continue the evil. Hard? Yes. But consistent with a holy God who doesn’t tolerate endless wickedness. The Bible presents these as historical, limited events fulfilled in the Old Testament. Christianity moves to grace, love your enemies, gospel for all.
Your Islam?
• Quran 9:5, 9:29 fight/subdue non-Muslims until they pay jizya or convert.
• Muhammad beheaded 600-900 Jewish men at Banu Qurayza, enslaved their women and children.
• Quran 4:24, 23:5-6 sex with “captives your right hands possess” is halal forever.
• Aisha at 9, child marriage still happening, jihad still killing innocents in 2026.
Moses’ commands: one-time, done. Muhammad’s: eternal Sunnah, producing child brides, sex slaves, and terrorism right now.
You laugh 😂 while defending a prophet whose bedroom and battlefield dwarf your selective outrage. Those “innocent” Midianite/Amalekite kids died in specific judgment. Your prophet’s victims die because his example is “perfect for all time.”
Stop deflecting. Address Aisha, Safiyya, Banu Qurayza, and modern Muslim practices. Or keep crying “innocent children” while your books command worse as divine.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@muheediva01 Have you ever thought about speaking less?

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@Che_AbdAllah
Classic deflection. You cherry-pick ancient wartime judgments against genocidal enemies while your prophet and Quran command ongoing conquest, killing, and sex slavery as eternal rules. Let’s expose the dishonesty.
Numbers 31:17-18
Midianites seduced Israel into mass idolatry and sexual immorality (Numbers 25 — 24,000 Israelites died in plague because of it). This was targeted divine judgment on a specific wicked nation, not a standing order. Virgin girls spared = integration into Israel (protection, not automatic rape they became part of the community). Context: total war in brutal ancient Near East where enemies did the same.
1 Samuel 15:3
Amalekites were serial attackers of Israel for centuries — cowardly raids on the weak, infants, etc. (Exodus 17, Deuteronomy 25). God’s command was specific judgment on unrepentant evil. These are historical theocratic wars against nations under God’s direct sentence, like Sodom. Not “kill kids for fun.”
The difference?
Bible records these as one-time judgments in Old Testament history. Christianity fulfills it with Jesus love enemies, turn cheek, gospel to all nations. No commands for Christians to wage holy war or take sex slaves today.
Your Islam?
• Quran 9:5, 9:29 fight and subdue non-Muslims.
• Quran 4:24, 23:5-6, 33:50 “what your right hands possess” = sex slaves/captives lawful forever. Muhammad took them (Safiyya, Rayhana, etc.).
• Hadiths: Muhammad beheaded 600-900 Jews at Banu Qurayza, enslaved women/children.
• Child marriage + Aisha at 9 still defended.
• Slavery and concubines still practiced or justified in parts of Muslim world.
You cry about 3,000-year-old specific battles while your “perfect example” (Quran 33:21) did conquest, execution of males, enslavement of women/children, and pedophilia as eternal Sunnah.
Moses’ commands were for then. Muhammad’s are for all time. Which one actually produces child brides, sex slavery, and jihad in 2026?
Stop projecting ancient judgments onto us while your books command worse as “moral right” forever. Address your prophet’s body count and bedroom. Or keep coping.
Your move, warrior of selective outrage.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@Che_AbdAllah
Cry harder with your Britannica copium. Puberty starts the process of becoming an adult it doesn’t magically make a 9-year-old mentally or emotionally mature. Britannica itself says adolescence runs to 19-20. A 9-year-old playing with dolls (as Aisha did in the hadiths) isn’t “adult” by any sane standard.
Your prophet married her at 6 and consummated at 9 (Sahih Bukhari 5134, 7:62:64, etc.). That’s not “post-puberty adult” — that’s pedophilia by modern and basic human standards. Multiple hadiths confirm she was still a small girl. Stop the revisionism.
Your deflection game is pathetic:
• Na’arah: Hebrew/Talmud defines it as post-12, marriageable young woman (not prepubescent). Deut 22:25-27 gives death penalty for actual rape. This was one ancient civil restitution law in a brutal tribal world — not an eternal “perfect example.”
• Presentism? Funny. You defend 7th-century actions as “moral forever” while crying when we judge them by today’s ethics. Islam claims Muhammad is the perfect role model for all time (Quran 33:21). So his 9-year-old bride is Sunnah still practiced in Muslim countries today. Christianity progressed beyond ancient harshness; Islam froze it.
• Slavery, war, etc.? The Bible records history and regulates ancient realities while pointing toward higher ethics (Jesus’ teachings). Your “perfect” prophet owned slaves, had sex slaves, and married a child. That’s the difference: one evolves, the other enshrines it.
You ran to “biology” to defend a grown man penetrating a 9-year-old. That’s not defense that’s sick. Christians don’t follow Moses’ civil laws as eternal perfection. You follow your prophet’s personal example as divine.
Address the hadiths or keep coping with “presentism” while little girls suffer in the name of your religion in 2026.
Your tears are delicious. What’s next? “But muh context” for the 6-year-old? Pathetic

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@Che_AbdAllah
Cute try twisting ancient Hebrew words while your own prophet married and consummated with a 9-year-old (Sahih Bukhari 5134, 7:62:64, etc.). Let’s dismantle your copium point by point.
1. “Na’arah = 12-year-old child”
Na’arah means young woman / marriageable maiden — post-puberty girl, not a prepubescent child. Talmud and Hebrew usage confirm it as a stage from ~12+ into young adulthood. Septuagint “paida” is just “young girl” in context of a virgin — same as English “girl” can mean 18-year-old. Stop dishonestly injecting “child” to smear. This law is about seduction/rape of an unmarried virgin in a tribal society with no welfare state. Rapist pays massive fine (50 shekels = huge sum), marries her, and cannot divorce — protecting her from lifelong shame and poverty.
Actual rape (force in the field) = death penalty (Deut 22:25-27). This isn’t “God loves rape” — it’s pragmatic justice for that era.
2. “Islam is superior — rapist killed!”
Lmao. Your “perfect example” Muhammad married Aisha at 6 and had sex with her at 9. That’s not “civil law for one case” — that’s the eternal role model for 1.8 billion people. Child marriage and “thighing” practices still happen in Muslim countries today because of it. Your prophet did what you’re accusing the Bible of. Projection level: expert.
3. “Church allowed 12-year-olds!”
Yes, historical minimums existed everywhere because life expectancy was ~30-40 and puberty hit earlier. But Christianity progressed — raised ages, emphasized consent, monogamy, and protection. Islam’s founder set the example at 9 and it’s still defended in 2026. Which one is stuck in the 7th century?
4. “No age in Bible so prove it!”
The Bible doesn’t prescribe child marriage as ideal. It condemns sexual immorality, honors women, and Jesus elevated marriage to lifelong covenant. Your books have explicit 9-year-old consummation as Sunnah.
Bottom line: One ancient civil case for restitution vs. your prophet’s personal action held up as perfect forever. Stop deflecting with “but muh Bible” while defending pedophilia by example. Address Aisha. Or keep laughing emojis while your side rapes kids under “religious freedom.”
Your move, defender of 9-year-old brides.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@SolaSixMillion The synagogue of Satan. You know the people who are living under a stolen identity of God’s chosen.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

@ShuKhan15
Nice try deflecting. Deuteronomy 22:28-29 is ancient Israelite civil law for a specific time and culture — it’s restitution and protection for the young woman (not a child) in a society without modern welfare, DNA tests, or police. It forces responsibility on the rapist: pay a heavy fine to her father, marry her, and never divorce so she’s not left ruined and destitute. It’s not “God commands you to rape kids” — that’s a dishonest smear.
Compare that to what your side actually defends today:
• Aisha was 6 when “married” and 9 when consummated with Muhammad (Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64, 5:58:234, etc.). That’s not ancient civil law — that’s the “perfect example” for all time in Islam.
• Child marriage is still legal and practiced in multiple Muslim countries right now. Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan — girls as young as 9 or 10.
• Your prophet’s example is followed by men who marry and rape little girls in the name of Sunnah in 2026.
My post was about giving approval for sexual relations with children now. You ran straight to a 3,000-year-old Jewish civil code while your own founder and living cultures do exactly what you’re accusing others of.
The Bible condemns rape as evil (Deut 22:25-27 — death penalty for it). Jesus raised the standard even higher. Islam’s founder did it and called it good.
Stop projecting. The “marry the child you raped” verse is in your books, not mine. Address that.

[Mario Serna @MarioSerna595]

Sorry, but I don’t take marching orders from internet strangers or cultural cowards. According to the one true God who formed me, men are called to reveal their face and let the glory of their Creator shine through unashamed. I was made in His image—not to hide it under fear, filters, or fake anonymity.
“For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God” (1 Corinthians 11:7). The same God who said “Let your light shine before others, so they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven” (Matthew 5:16) doesn’t command His sons to cower behind avatars or obey the mob’s pressure to conceal themselves. Hiding is the way of the fearful. I fear God, not man.
“The fear of man lays a snare, but whoever trusts in the Lord is safe” (Proverbs 29:25).
So no, I won’t dim the light or cover the face God gave me to appease your discomfort or trends. If seeing a real man living boldly offends you, that’s your problem—not mine. Stand for truth or scroll on. My face, my witness, my obedience to the Almighty. Period.

[₿en Wehrman @benwehrman]

"Let the goyim deal in the real world”
- Jeffrey Epstein