@KatKanada_TM@farmingandJesus I think the Catholics get the worse of a nuanced biblical argument.
But what should be indisputable is that the no marriage rule kept a lid on corruption.
@charlesmurray Assuming the key asset of a president in the 21st century is the ability to act while under siege from the bureaucracy, intel, the media, NGOs and the UN, Scott Walker comes to mind.
@instapundit So, is the expression neutral, like the ghetto vernacular, "give me some more of that shit"?
Or is it critical, suggesting a continuing list of bad things?
@JohnRad15@seconds_0 TBF, the Wampanoag of 1520 seem like a pretty good tribe. The Powhatan of 1520 do not.
And that's our sample size of English initial contact: a dozen tribes or fewer; a one decade slice of history; a perspective limited to diplomatic contact between leaders.
I am not going to get into the game of whether there was one tribe with a great social structure. My knowledge is too limited.
I am going to say that every time I hear a story of a great tribe, the person telling me the story also has limited knowledge, without a corresponding limit on his confidence.
@JohnRad15@seconds_0 I have heard a lot of "noble savage" fairy tales. They usually depend on wishful thinking and a lack of written history. And they usually break down once we understand the history better. Incas and Aztecs were not enlightened, egalitarian societies.
And how do you think those emigrants would have voted?
Canada is in danger of creating a democratic death spiral like Detroit (1950-1975) or San Francisco (2015-2030).
The less productive 55% are encouraged to vote for resentment against the more productive 45%. The most productive leave. The balance shifts to 56-44 and the policies double-down.
@JohnRad15@seconds_0 In the Europe of 1200, 3/4 of the population were serfs, before they started taking on the freer positions of wage laborers or free tenant farmers.
In the USSR of 1950, 3/4 of the population compelled without in their labour.
Capitalism was the rest in the middle.
@Doc_aka_Rich@Sierra_rak If you abandon state ownership of the means of production, you are no longer doing a straightforward socialism.
You are doing a modified form of socialism called fascism.