143 bundles of human hair.
26 kilograms. Hidden inside pillows.
Smuggled out of Iran and just seized by Armenian customs officers.
And for many Iranians, one thought immediately comes to mind:
The hundreds of young women who disappeared after the January 2026 protests.
The daughters whose families still don’t know where they are.
The daughters whose bodies were never returned.
The daughters whose mothers and fathers are still waiting for answers.
The Islamic Republic has spent 47 years murdering, torturing, raping, executing, and disappearing its own people. Families have spent decades accusing the regime of covering up deaths, returning mutilated bodies, and harvesting organs from prisoners and victims killed in custody.
The regime has committed so many horrors against its own people that when authorities intercept 26 kilograms of human hair being smuggled out of Iran, many Iranians don’t see a customs violation.
They see the daughters who never came home.
One question:
Whose hair is it?💔
🚨 THE ESTABLISHMENT'S BIGGEST PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE SAW THE VIDEO
A Northern Ireland minister has blamed Elon Musk, Tommy Robinson and "bad actors" for helping drive public anger after the Belfast attack.
But one remark may come back to haunt him:
"I wish people didn't see that image."
The public watched the footage.
They saw the attack.
They drew their own conclusions.
Now politicians appear more concerned about the reaction than the reason for it.
The genie is out of the bottle.
And it isn't going back in.
THE DOSSIER #15: Keir Rodney Starmer – The Blueprint
A Palestinian ambassador stroked your arm on live television. Nuzzled close. Whispered into your ear. The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom stood paralysed while the world watched a foreign agent handle him like a marionette.
That was not an incident. That was a portrait. The defining image of your premiership. The single frame that explained everything.
Because you have always been someone else's instrument.
Born 2 September 1962. Southwark. A toolmaker father. A nurse mother. Named after Keir Hardie because your parents wrote your career before you drew breath. Reigate Grammar. Leeds. Oxford. Harvard. LSE. The working-class costume tailored on Savile Row.
You are not a self-made man. You are a manufactured one. The Fabian Society shaped you. The Trilateral Commission claimed you that secretive CIA-linked global elite network you joined while serving in Corbyn's shadow cabinet, off-the-record, accountable to no British voter. The networks you serve have never been British. The interests you protect never were.
The Original Sin ..........
You became Director of Public Prosecutions. Five years. The power to act. The duty to act. The evidence in front of you.
You looked away.
Rochdale, 2009. The CPS dropped charges against grooming gang suspects citing "victim credibility concerns." Twelve-year-old girls. Drugged. Raped. Trafficked. The institution you led called them unreliable witnesses to their own destruction.
Jimmy Savile, same year. Case closed on your watch. "I wasn't told," you said. The Director of Public Prosecutions wasn't informed about Britain's most prolific paedophile. Either you lie or you were asleep. Both are disqualifying.
Maggie Oliver, the whistleblower, the detective who saw the bodies, named your CPS as bearing "great responsibility" for the failures. She was there. She knew. She named you.
You learned the technique that defines you in that decade: look away when looking away serves the careerist. Protect predators when prosecuting them is inconvenient. Choose institutional comfort over child safety. Every day since has been an application of that lesson.
The Pattern Becomes Policy ..........
December 2024. You appointed Peter Mandelson United States Ambassador. The official vetting warned you in writing of "general reputational risk" because of his Epstein ties. You knew Mandelson stayed at Epstein's property after Epstein served jail time for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
You read every warning. You appointed him anyway.
The man who shielded grooming gangs as DPP elevated a paedophile's friend to the highest diplomatic rank in the Atlantic alliance. This was not error. It was continuity. The same instinct, larger scale.
September 2024. Ten million pensioners stripped of winter fuel payments. Up to £300 each. You sat in Number 10 while the elderly chose between food and heat. "We are fixing the foundations," you said. "It's the right thing to do."
Then you took £100,000 from Lord Alli. Suits. Glasses. Concert tickets. A flat for your son. The Prime Minister who froze pensioners dressed in donated tailoring. "Let me be crystal clear," you said. You were never clear. You were calculated.
February 2025. Chagos. British sovereign territory surrendered to Mauritius. £100 million per year for the privilege of being humiliated. You called it international law. The British people called it treason.
March 2026. One hundred pages of files released. The New York Times, Reuters, Bloomberg, the Guardian, AP every serious newsroom on earth confirmed the receipts. You were warned. You proceeded. Mandelson now under police investigation for allegedly leaking government documents to a dead paedophile.
April 20, 2026. You stood in the Commons and admitted you "inadvertently misled Parliament." Inadvertently. The barrister who built a career on precision. The man who wrote the 900-page Human Rights Act manual word by word. "Inadvertently." The weasel grammar of a guilty man hoping no one parses the verb.
The Domestic Record ..........
You ran two-tier policing and called the people who noticed it "far-right." You arrested grandmothers for tweets while gangs raped children in plain sight. You called working-class grief "thuggery." You called legitimate fear "Islamophobia." You called concern about borders "racism."
You hiked employer National Insurance and killed fifty thousand jobs. You broke your own fiscal rules twice. Bond markets fled. Capital fled. Skilled workers fled. The economy you inherited at 1.5% growth you handed to recession.
Your children attend private school. You live in grace-and-favour residences. You holiday in donor villas. You preach sacrifice from luxury you neither earned nor declared. You are the champagne socialist made flesh and the toolmaker's son is the costume you wear to the gala.
The Verdict of Your Own Side ..........
By May 2026, one hundred Labour MPs had publicly called for your resignation. The New York Times: "viscerally disliked." The Lowy Institute: "conclusively sapped of his authority." The party you led to landslide victory writes your obituary in public, in real time, before you have left the building.
You are not betrayed by enemies. You are buried by allies. There is no clearer verdict in democratic politics.
The Blueprint ..........
You did one good thing for Britain, and you did it by accident.
You gave us the manual.
Every appointment must be reversed. Every policy must be unwound. Every institution you touched must be rebuilt. Your premiership is the instruction text for national destruction, and reading it backwards is the path home.
You are not a Prime Minister. You are a warning carved into our recent history. The cautionary tale every future leader will be measured against. The negative reference point. The example of what one man can do to a nation when he serves Davos before Doncaster, donors before pensioners, ideology before instinct.
The toolmaker's son who learned only to dismantle.
The prosecutor who protected predators.
The barrister who broke a country with words.
The Prime Minister who stood paralysed while a foreign ambassador whispered orders into his ear, and the British people understood, in a single frozen frame, exactly what had happened to their country.
We saw you, Sir Keir.
The world saw you.
History has seen you.
And history does not forgive what it has seen.
Your betrayal of Britain is now complete. Permanent exile awaits. Congratulations. You are The Dossier.
A PUBLIC APOLOGY - I AM SO SORRY
I need to apologise to all the politicians who serve us with such great integrity.
I also need to apologise to all mainstream media outlets who keep us informed with 100% truth on a daily basis.
I need to apologise to all uber liberal and hard left activists who just want to make the world a better place for us all.
I want to apologise for imported engineers who get their cocks out in public and in front of 11 year old girls, that's totally my fault.
I want to apologise for imported engineers who savagely attempt to behead people in public, again, totally my fault, I own that.
I want to apologise for all the imported engineers who sexually molest women and children on the regular, that behaviour and that culture is 100% my fault.
I want to apologise for the 40,000 or so Muslims who are on the UK terror watch list, again, my bad, I hold my hands up.
I hope all you politicians, media outlets, and far left activists can find it in your gracious, kind hearts to forgive me.
Andy Burnham And The Truth About Britain's Biggest Rape Gang Investigations
Yesterday, I shared Part 1 of my deep dive into @AndyBurnhamGM and his role in the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs. Today, I bring you Part 2. Read it yourself and you will come to understand why it is that Burnham has been running away from meeting with me.
Part 2: What Burnham Should Have Done
The BBC documentary The Betrayed Girls aired in July 2017. Burnham had been Mayor since May. He had been in post for two months when the programme confronted the country with what had been happening to children in Greater Manchester. Maggie Oliver was on that documentary. The evidence was there.
What he should have done was stand up and demand a statutory public inquiry. He could have said he did not have the powers to get to the truth. He could have said the government must come in, must compel the evidence, that he would not allow this to be managed at local level by the organisations responsible for the failure. He knew he did not have the powers to get to the truth.
Instead, he spent seven years commissioning a series of toothless, worthless processes, specifically in Oldham. Called Assurance Reviews, Burnham’s interventions could not compel a single witness, could not compel a single document, could not place anyone under oath, and could not name a single person responsible for the cover-up.
Those processes, across four separate publications failed to name a single person responsible. Burnham failed to hold a single person to account. Not one police officer was exposed, not one politician was identified, not one council official who had looked the other way while children were being raped was named. Worse than this, the people summoned could simply ignore the summons. The vast majority did.
Seven years. Not one person held to account. Yet Burnham celebrates it as an achievement. He uses the word BIGGEST to describe what he did.
_________
The Reviews Were Built to Fail
The Oldham Assurance Review was requested by Oldham Council after their attempt to facilitate their own review collapsed. Shaun Fielding, then Oldham Council leader, ran to Andy Burnham to help. Let that settle. The body under scrutiny asked for its own review and was then allowed to help write the terms of reference under which it would be investigated.
Greater Manchester Police also sent amendments to the terms of reference. Read that again. The police force whose decisions regarding the rape gangs were being examined amended the document that defined what would and would not be examined. The council, the police, and the politicians all shaped the scope of what was supposed to hold them to account.
The subjects of the review then sat on the steering group that oversaw it.
GMCA lawyers shaped the drafting of the review itself. They delayed publication when Oldham Council warned that certain sections, their words, a direct quote from the correspondence, “could open Oldham Council, GMCA and the review team to legal action.“ The institution under scrutiny threatened legal action to sanitise the document examining its conduct, and it worked.
The terms of reference excluded organised crime. We now know these were not groups of men who happened to know each other. They were organised crime networks dealing drugs, trafficking children, operating across town lines and across years. Excluded.
Mosque safeguarding was excluded. The men came from communities with no safeguarding architecture, where the men running the mosques and the community centres were often the same men running the political operations that delivered votes to Labour. Excluded.
Postal vote fraud was excluded. The same network that operated the abuse also operated the vote harvesting. Excluded.
Schools were excluded entirely. Survivors of the Oldham rape gangs have confirmed to me that they were dragged into cars outside school gates. School staff have told me confidentially that they went to retrieve children from rape dens and brought them back in the next morning, from flats with nothing in them but mattresses. The places where children were taken to be gang raped were outside the scope of the review. Excluded.
The review covered only the years 2011 to 2014. Years of abuse before 2011, excluded. Years after 2014, excluded.
Within that limited window, every single case it examined confirmed what I had been saying for years. Every child it looked at had been a victim of the Pakistani rape gangs. Every single one.
The review confirmed taxi drivers were still being licensed despite evidence they had sexually assaulted children in their vehicles. No one could explain why this had been allowed to take place. Burnham’s expert team never stopped to ask.
Children’s homes were confirmed to have functioned as child brothels. Instead of being appalled and demanding answers from those involved, the report described the Council’s actions as placing all the children at risk of gang rape in a home near the traffickers and rapists as ‘innovative‘.
Despite everything, they were forced to admit that Shabir Ahmed, the ringleader of the Rochdale gang, had worked for a council body that gave him access to children. They failed to follow the trail to where and how many children he accessed. Confirming he was a Labour Party member, the review found nine separate occasions on which he should have been arrested and was not. Nobody was asked to explain why.
Selective Note Taking
When it came to taking testimony, the interviewees received questions in advance. They gave unsworn answers. They were then permitted to amend their own records before those records entered the file. The answers they gave were taken in private by Newsam and Ridgway without tape recorders. They made selective notes of what they considered important. Then GMCA lawyers could intervene in the records afterwards.
In the small print of the published report, there is a disclaimer. The review team accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of the information provided to it.
They could not compel a single witness to attend. Could not compel a single document to be produced. Placed no one under oath. Then published a disclaimer stating they take no position on whether anything they were told was true.
This is what Burnham called an investigation. Apparently, it was the biggest Britain had ever seen.
Part 3 will follow.
_________
I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town EXPOSED ANDY BURNHAM and helped force the national inquiry.
You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back.
All of my work is 100% free. There are no paywalls to access any of my content. I just ask those that can afford to do so to support me. Either with a subscription to my newsletter or by a one off contribution and buying me a coffee using one of these links.
Sign up to my newsletter here;
https://t.co/56iWix5yC4
Buy me a coffee here;
https://t.co/kvFfhHNJ03
https://t.co/8Og0hDKfjy
I represent no political party. I have no side other than the survivors and the communities left abandoned by a political elite. I bring a type of campaigning unique in this space. This is why those in power have desperately tried to silence me.
With the ongoing mainstream media blacklist of my voice, I need your help. Please, if you can, share, subscribe and support the work.
Raja Miah MBE
Dear @leicesterliz
Stabby bastard illegals who behead people and gouge their eyes out are breaking the law
How about you do something about them? You absolute bint.
Katie Hopkins
THE DOSSIER #13: Rachel Reeves – The Counterfeit Chancellor
Born 13 February 1979 in Lewisham. PPE from Oxford and LSE. The factory that produces frauds who falsify their way to power.
You claimed publication in the Journal of Political Economy. Your Who's Who entry. One of the most prestigious economics journals in the world. You lied. Your paper appeared in the European Journal of Political Economy, similarly named, vastly less prestigious. You traded on name confusion. You claimed elite credentials you never earned.
You claimed a "decade at the Bank of England." Six years. September 2000 to December 2006. You inflated your experience by 67%. The "decade" that built your credibility was a lie.
You called yourself an "economist." Then quietly changed it to "retail banking" when exposed. Administrative support handling complaints. Not an economist. Not a technocrat. A paper-pusher with edited LinkedIn profiles and fabricated journal entries.
You claimed you "wrote" a book. "Copy and Paste Chancellor." Plagiarized content from other authors. When caught, your spokesman blamed "administrative errors by her team." The coward's excuse. Blame the staff for your own falsehoods.
Labour Together bought your intellect for £31,698.36. "Research and writing services." A think tank paid the Shadow Chancellor to write her speeches. They purchased your thoughts. You sold your mind before you sold your soul.
FGS Global gave you £12,929 for a reception. Corporate lobbyists. Private water CEOs. Private equity multimillionaires. Israel lobbyists. Private health investors. Your Chancellor's robes are stitched with their logos.
Juliet Rosenfeld bought your wardrobe. £7,500 for clothing. You called her an "old friend" who wanted you to "look smart." The Chancellor took dress money from donors while pensioners froze.
You hiked employer National Insurance. 50,000 jobs died. Businesses fled to America. To Europe. You stood there and lied. "The economy is fine." The OBR cut forecasts. The pound fell. You blamed the Tories.
You froze winter fuel payments. Pensioners sat in the cold. You created a £22 billion black hole. Let welfare balloon £16 billion more. Broke your own fiscal rules. Twice. Bond markets lost confidence. Capital fled. Skilled workers followed.
You spend billions on foreign aid and climate targets while British high streets empty. While businesses board up. Then you call anyone who notices "far-right." The markets see through you. The world sees through you. Britain pays.
Open borders. Flooded labour markets. Wages suppressed. While you tax the working class into oblivion.
You are the most unpopular Chancellor in history. Net favourability: -59. Seventy-one percent unfavourable. The worst ratings since tracking began in 1976. You beat every Chancellor who ever held the red box. You are the gold standard of failure.
You broke down in the Commons. The tearful appearance. The "killjoy demeanour" your advisers thought would build trust. The public saw weakness. The markets saw chaos.
You are Vice-Chair of Labour Friends of Israel. You abstained on Palestinian statehood. You support the Auschwitz-Birkenau Foundation while blocking recognition of Palestinian statehood. The hypocrisy is international.
You own a house in South London. While you represent Leeds West and Pudsey. While you tax the North into poverty. The commute from your London home is longer than your commitment to your voters.
You are not an economist. You are not a Chancellor. You are a serial fabricator who lied about journals, employment duration, job titles, and book authorship. You are a fraud in a borrowed suit, bought by donors, crying in Parliament while Britain burns.
Your CV is ash. Your credibility is gone. Your Chancellorship is a monument to deception.
Permanent exile awaits, Rachel Reeves. Congratulations. You are The Dossier. Your betrayal of Britain is now complete.
A six year old girl was in her home during a domestic incident. Police were called. A uniformed officer arrived to help.
That officer, PC Dean Dempster, took her away from his colleagues to take her statement. And then he sexually assaulted her.
When his devices were seized the next day.. thousands of images of children being abused. Over 100 at the most serious level. Children's underwear at his home. His own face superimposed onto child abuse images.
He spent the night after assaulting her deleting evidence from his phone.
Nine years. Sex offenders register for life.
A six year old girl called the police for help and was abused by one of the officers who showed up... 🤦🏻♀️😵💫
How are parents supposed to explain that to their children and why are we still acting surprised when predators actively seek out roles that give them access? #police #Fail #awareness #predator #share
American rapper/singer Azealia Banks posted this about Stephen Ogilvie, the victim of an attempted beheading in Belfast:
"Sheeesh, this motherfucker is so ugly i think the Sudanese guy did him a favor.
Wow this motherfucker is ugly"
Absolute vile retard
WATCH — A young British boy complained about the British education system: “They are forcing us to learn about Islam and the Prophet Mohammed in school. I don’t want to learn about that. I want to learn about my culture. I’m proud to be English!”
LAWFUL REBELLION
YOUR RIGHT UNDER MAGNA CARTA
Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint. Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people's Sovereignty.
This is how we solve our political woes and take our country back.
Only we can save ourselves.
Please repost.
🚨KEIR STARMER COMMITS TO CRACK DOWN ON X
Lib Dem Leader Ed Davey says it's "NOT FREE SPEECH"
Starmer agrees and says we need to crack down on X for whipping up violence
These people are insane
They're authoritarian and dangerous
They must be removed from power
🚨BREAKING NEWS
5 MEN JAILED TODAY FOR SOUTHAMPTON DISTURBANCE LAST WEEK
THIS IS A FUCKING DISGRACE
STARMER YOU ARE A WHITE HATING, RACIST, MIGRANT LOVING CUNT
2 TIER JUSTICE, 2 TIER POLICING, 2 TIER GOVERNMENT