1/ I’ll just leave this post pinned here.
Over the past year, I’ve been actively using @Polymarket .
It’s genuinely impressive how far the world of betting platforms has come.
You can literally bet on whether Trump will sneeze or not during his next speech😅
Vitalik explaining Prividium:
“The compromise between centralization and decentralization that actually makes a lot more sense is: you have an application and today that application is a server. You can keep your server, but instead, we’re going to add scaffolding on top to give users extra security guarantees. You put Merkle roots on chain. You put proofs on chain. And you give your users assurance that whatever is happening inside of your system is actually following the rules. So you have high scale, high performance, and you optimize for a minimal delta for existing centralized infrastructure deployment. Keep your existing infrastructure the way it is, and you just add a side car that makes the roots and the proofs.”
@VietnamPenguin Positive funding means that for now there are too many passengers with long position. So its kinda usual that market going opposite to trigger massive liquidation. It's a probably the most common way to earn money when you are exchange or something simillar.
@MadMaxx_eth In the beggining this challenge supposed to be a Moon sheet motivation for holders and investors in ZK token. But nowadays it turned opposite side: it only shows how bad things are, bewaring to not touching this shit ever. So this challenge became to antiZKsync thesis.
@TheZKNation Anyone surprised? 😅
Of course it will. Gratz. Your team will eat well. But firstly find liquidity for sell lol.
Liquidity are close to zero. So probably you will have to sell this Tokens on OTC with discount, like -80% from now. Congrats, it will destroy token even more 😅
@TheZKNation Maybe at least create fcking v31 proposal? This team is annoying AF. It seems like they want to destroy their project with all possible ways. As fast as they can. Otherwise I dont know how to explain why they doing such a horrible steps with a very awful timings.
@neutize "Great so see"😂😂😂
Dude, this proposal was created only for one reason: make money for the team. I'm 100% sure that this money is not for building. Or a very small part of this will go to fund building. So for us this proposal was 100% negative and only lead to more dilution.
6 weeks after $ZK touched 0.00948$ 🥲🥲🥲🥲 can devs do something 🥲
Also, huge thanks to the $BTC dump for the support. Really appreciated. 👍
The team keeps shipping. Adoption keeps growing. Fundamentals keep improving.
At some point, i hope, the market will catch up 🔥🔥
There has been a lot of discussion on the @zksync governance forum around the proposed 2026 Prividium funding plan.
My forum account is still awaiting approval, so I'll share my thoughts here.
First, since the proposal was published on June 1, $ZK is down ~25%. While some may point to market conditions, ZK has also underperformed both ETH (-10%) and STRK (-15%) over the same period. It's difficult to ignore the market's reaction to the proposal itself (and that's before voting has even started, let alone implementation).
Second, it's clear there is currently no sustainable bid for ZK in the open market. Promising future utility is not the same as delivering it. Crypto markets have stopped pricing in promises a long time ago.
With that in mind, I believe @the_matter_labs@gluk64 should consider alternative funding approaches for Prividium 2026:
1/ Delay this proposal until the new features are live on mainnet and protocol revenue buybacks create a sustainable source of demand for $ZK. Deliver utility and value to holders first, then fund development from a stronger position.
2/ If funding is urgently needed, consider OTC deals with transparent terms (e.g. 6+ month lockups), or bring in a strategic investor willing to make a long-term bet on institutional adoption of Prividium.
Matter Labs should be the first to send a clear signal that it is committed to growing token value, not just treating the token as a source of funding.
@VietnamPenguin TBH its a sad thing that all influencers vote in favour in this proposal. At least some big people from community need to ask a question for ZKsync team "Why community pay, why not VC funds". In this market condition this proposal leads token to death.
@JourneyMacro@TheZKNation And v31 is are first version of interop. Private interop (main fee if we believe in prividiums) will start working in v32 only (I think at the end of the year). So at least for 6 months there are almost no fee will be collected in ZK token.
@JourneyMacro@TheZKNation Important to note, the current estimated date might change due to internal testing/further security hardening, and we’ll update the post once voting starts, and the date becomes more clear.