This judge sent a veteran who served in Iraq/Afghanistan to jail for two years over Facebook posts he made in the wake of child murders.
She also let rapist, Rees Newman who SA'd a 13 yo girl go free citing "overcrowded prisons."
Her name is Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, Cardiff.
🚨 This is Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, Recorder of Cardiff. She sentenced ex-soldier Daffron Williams a 41-year-old veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and suffers from PTSD to two years in prison (half to be served in custody) for Facebook posts made in the tense days after the Southport child murders.
His posts referenced “civil war is here” and included anti-Islamic imagery. She acknowledged his military service, good character references, and mental health struggles… but still sent him to prison for words on the internet.
The same judge has also jailed others for social media posts in the post-riot crackdown, including 24-year-old David Morgan who received 20 months for tweets involving Nazi imagery and racist content.
Yet when Rees Newman convicted of the historic rape of a girl under 14 appeared before her for breaching his sex offender requirements, she suspended his two-month jail term, explicitly citing prison overcrowding.
A veteran with PTSD goes to prison for Facebook comments warning about cultural conflict.
A child rapist walks free because the jails are too full.
#MPsPensions
If Britain can't afford 'decent state pensions' for it's retiring workers, how can it pay those huge pensions to all MP's as well as all those expense claims all year. (Worth more than treble a state pension) . . . ??
If Vladimir Putin changed the voting system days before an election to stop his opponents winning, every British journalist would call it what it is: rigging the rules.
Tonight, Labour rammed through a last‑minute switch in the Lords so that if Andy Burnham wins Makerfield and quits as Greater Manchester Mayor, his replacement won’t be chosen on a simple first‑past‑the‑post ballot, but on the supplementary vote system instead.
Why now?
Because Labour knows the race to replace Burnham would be a straight two‑horse fight with Reform UK – and under FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, no second chances, no back‑room redistributions, no “stop Reform” stitch‑ups.
Under SV, Labour gets a second bite of the cherry: if their candidate can limp into the top two, they can hoover up second preferences from every other party and magic a “majority” on the second count, even if Reform tops the poll on first preferences.
This isn’t “modernising democracy”. It’s the governing party using its Commons majority and the unelected Lords to hurriedly doctor the rules of one specific contest because it’s terrified the voters might choose someone else.
When the establishment preached to the world about “rules‑based order”, they forgot to mention one thing: in Britain, the rules are “based” on whether Labour thinks it might lose.
🚨🇬🇧 Keir Starmer says he’ll “carry on with what he was elected to do”
Britain NEVER voted for mass surveillance, open borders, or two-tier policing.
No wonder his approval is at 20%. The entire country HATES him.
22 YEARS LATER AND NOBODY HAS ANSWERED FOR WHAT HAPPENED TO DR DAVID KELLY
His name was Dr David Kelly. Most people have forgotten him. They shouldn't.
He was a quiet, mild-mannered scientist who spent his career inspecting weapons facilities around the world.
He knew more about Iraq's arsenal than almost anyone alive.
In 2003, Tony Blair's @InstituteGC government published a dossier claiming Saddam Hussein could deploy chemical weapons within 45 minutes. That claim was used to justify a war.
Kelly knew the intelligence behind it was being exaggerated. He said so, privately, to a @BBCNews journalist.
That one conversation destroyed his life.
The government found out he was the source. Instead of protecting a man who had served his country for decades, they quietly let his name reach the press. He was publicly identified, dragged before two parliamentary committees, and grilled by his own employer.
His wife said he came home a broken man.
On the afternoon of 17 July 2003, he left his house for a walk in the Oxfordshire countryside. He was 59 years old. He never came back.
His body was found the next morning in woodland. A knife beside him. A blister pack of painkillers nearby.
Here is where it gets worse.
Tony Blair personally intervened to replace the normal coroner's inquest with a private inquiry run by Lord Hutton.
The original inquest was suspended before it even properly began. It was never resumed. To this day,
Dr David Kelly is the only person in England and Wales in living memory to have died in unexplained circumstances without receiving a full coroner's inquest.
Lord Hutton concluded suicide. Case closed.
Except eight senior doctors and a former coroner wrote to @thetimes saying the verdict was medically unsafe.
The wound found on Kelly's wrist, a severed ulnar artery, would not cause fatal blood loss in a healthy person.
There were no fingerprints on the knife. The painkillers found were not in a quantity that experts considered lethal.
The government's response, delivered by Attorney General Dominic Grieve in 2011, was essentially: the Hutton Inquiry was good enough, stop asking questions.
Think about that. A man quietly raised concerns about the biggest political deception in modern British history, a war that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. He was publicly exposed, professionally destroyed, and found dead days later and the government personally made sure there would never be a proper independent investigation into how he died.
Tony Blair went on to become a Middle East Peace Envoy. He has a knighthood.
Dr David Kelly got a private inquiry, a rushed verdict, and a sealed post-mortem report that was not released to the public for years.
Nobody was ever held accountable. Not for any of it.
This story should be on the front page every single year. Share it if you think it matters.
Sources: @BBCNews@guardian@thetimes@PrivateEyeNews
🚨BREAKING: Hampshire Police WILL NOT charge Vickrum Digwa's Brother despite him being caught on camera agreeing to LIE to cover up Henry Nowak's Murder
A leading lawyer has told the Daily Mail he believes Gurpreet Digwa should have been prosecuted for:
- PREVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE
- PERJURY
- ASSISSTING AN OFFENDER
- OBSTRUCTING POLICE
This is outrageous
WHY ARE POLICE NOT PROSECUTING HIM?
🚨WOW: Sadiq Khan personally READ reports on young girls gang-raped in London hotels by Muslims plied with drugs, threatened & abused.
YET on multiple occasions, he publicly denied grooming gangs exist in the capital.
This denial has enabled abuse.
Accountability is overdue.
No charges brought against Vickrum Digwa's brother.
Gurpreet Digwa lied to the police telling them:
'we've been racially attacked by a white person'
Henry Nowak died because police believed this lie.
Absolutely disgusting.
🚨 THE DIGITAL PRISON IS ALREADY HERE.
Good morning to the millions of hardworking Brits waking up to a brand new surveillance state.
55 million adults will soon need to hand over their passport or face scan just to use X, Instagram and YouTube.
Every single adult. Not just teenagers.
450,000 people signed a petition to scrap it in days. The government said no!
The same government that cannot track 224,700 failed asylum seekers wants your biometric data before you are allowed to post a tweet.
This was never about children. Screenshot this before they bury it. RT if you refuse. 🇬🇧🔥
I have put restrictions on my kids phones so they can’t use them before 7am or after 8pm except to make calls/send texts.
They can’t download apps without me approving and they’re not allowed:
WhatsApp
Instagram
TikTok
Snapchat
X
It’s called parenting, some should try it.
So let me get this ABSOLUTELY straight…
The public are being told facial recognition cameras, Digital ID and eventually digital currency are all about “security” and “safety”.
Meaning every payment, every document and every movement could one day be linked directly back to YOU.
But here’s the part hardly anyone talks about…
MPs and members of the Royal Family are reportedly exempt from parts of Digital ID systems for “security reasons”.
So the very people creating and supporting these systems won’t necessarily have to live under them in the same way as everyone else.
Ordinary people could end up being monitored through one vast digital network, while those at the top remain outside parts of it.
Whether you support Digital ID or oppose it, surely the same rules should apply to everyone.
Because the moment people believe there is one set of rules for MPs, the Royal Family and the political class, and another for everybody else, trust in government starts to disappear.
And looking around Britain today, it’s not hard to see why so many people are losing faith.
The real issue isn’t technology. It’s whether the people creating the system are willing to live under it themselves and if they aren’t then WHY and WHY should anyone else be expected to then.
🚨THIS IS JUDGE LORD JUSTICE TIMOTHY HOLROYDE
This is the judge who REFUSED Lucy Connolly her appeal after she was convicted for a social media post.
Meanwhile this very same judge CUT the sentence of Labour's Lord Ahmed by THREE YEARS after he was convicted of child sex offences. His sentence was reduced to just two and a half years from five and half years.
SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!
.@UKLabour and the worst prime minister to ever exist @Keir_Starmer want to control our children but can’t control our borders! If you care so much about keeping our children safe, before banning social media from them (which is purely a stepping stone to then start taking full control of it across the board) why don’t you try banning illegal immigrants that are actively hunting, harming and as we’ve witnessed time and time again, killing our children. Social media isn’t the problem. YOU ARE! 🤬
How you can’t feel or see that from the general populous is completely beyond me!
You’ve not one clue how to keep a community safe, let alone our children and our country!
Leave our kids alone, we’ll decide what’s right or wrong for them, not some far left corrupt government! LABOUR OUT! 👊🏼
Jeremy’s comment on the government’s proposed 9pm social media curfew for 16 & 17 year olds -
“You don’t trust them to be on social media after 9pm, yet you’re happy for them to vote. How does that work? Am I taking crazy pills?”
🚨 A "BIG MOMENT FOR OUR COUNTRY."
Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits waking up to a new digital prison.
Keir Starmer has just officially announced his blanket ban on social media for teenagers!
He literally stood at a podium, rambled on about his childhood in the 1970s, and claimed he is doing this to keep your kids safe. 🤡
You honestly have to laugh at the sheer delusion.
He completely refuses to protect our actual streets from violent criminals, but he is completely obsessed with policing your family's phones.
Do not be fooled for a single second!
To enforce this ban, every single adult in Britain will now be forced to upload a passport or digital ID just to browse the web!
This is not about child safety. It is a massive Trojan horse for total state surveillance.
RT if you see right through this scam and refuse to let the Labour elite control us! 🇬🇧🔥
🚨 THE ULTIMATE WESTMINSTER COVER UP.
Keir Starmer is desperately parading around a Russian oil tanker today to hide
the absolute meltdown happening inside his own government.
Two top defence ministers have just walked out in total disgust.
Labour is offering a completely insulting 0.08 percent increase to our military
budget by 2030. 🤡
They will happily bleed the working class dry to fund a spiralling welfare state
and luxury migrant hotels. 💷
But when our brave armed forces need the basic kit to actually defend the realm,
the establishment suddenly claims the treasury is empty.
He is a total fraud playing global tough guy for the cameras while leaving
Britain completely exposed.
RT if you see right through this charade and demand we fully fund our military!
🇬🇧🔥