Marxe

Culture and Change Consultant, Coach.

[Tamara Kronis 🇨🇦 @KronisTamara]

Dear generation screwed, if you were waiting for prices to drop before buying a house, the Liberal government is bailing out developers and bidding against you, so that you can be a renter instead.

[Lola @thefempire50]

Things that have no impact on the legality of women’s spaces:

- how men are treated in men’s prisons
- how embarrassed a man feels undressing in the men’s changing rooms
- any discomfort a man might feel using a men’s toilet
- any body issues a man has that affects how he sees himself

If organisations want to find ways to alleviate the above then by all means, feel free. But you can’t solve the problem by removing the rights of women.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

@ForWomenScot ‘This is all very complicated. Should we lock up double rapists wearing wigs with a bunch of vulnerable women? People just don’t understand how complex this is. On the one hand, doing so would be inhumane and unlawful. On the other, he’s wearing pink leggings.’

[Echo 🔆 @TheEcho13]

Men did not build a world that called women inferior because women were powerless.

They built it because women had forms of power that could not be taken from them cleanly: intuition, social intelligence, sexual selectivity, birth, emotional range, the ability to create life and then organise life around it.

So they made those gifts look unstable. Irrational. Dirty. Dangerous. They turned female instinct into hysteria, female desire into shame, female standards into cruelty, and female creation into duty.

That is how you control what you envy.

You do not have to destroy it. You just convince her to distrust it.

[Marxe @Marxe]

@iamisla_ Asking her out in the 90s: "You look great and I'd love to go out with you"
Asking her out in the 20s: "Here is a d1ck pick. Send me nudes"

[🙏🌧🌍 @godblesstoto]

Media today:

When middle class liberal women were having their knees stroked by leering CEOs, it was worthy of a global movement.

When 12 year old working class white girls are having broken bottles and baseball bats inserted into them, it's not worth bothering with.

[Marxe @Marxe]

@ThrillaRilla369 I guess it depends on the age. If it's older than 6, I would expect that she would come by herself, check out if it was empty and then do her business while the father waits at the door. Younger than that, I would expect he would take it to the male's with all due precautions.

[Ani O'Brien @aniobrien]

At what point are we allowed to stop pretending that "non-binary" is a serious concept? Not that I ever pretended, but I mean "we" as in society.

It's insane how quickly society went from "gender stereotypes are limiting and every should just do their own thing" to "if a man likes knitting and power tools he is actually neither male nor female".

People can dress however they want. Wear suits, dresses, dungarees, clown costumes, or a friggin' traffic cone if they choose. None of that changes the fact that they are either male or female though.

What I object to is the demand that the rest of us participate in the performance.

A few years ago, almost nobody had heard of non-binary identities. Now we're expected to master an ever-expanding vocabulary, remember bespoke pronouns, and indulge the fantasy that someone has transcended the sexes because they shop in both the men's and women's departments.

Apparently if you don't play along, you're hateful. Well, you've probably seen what they say about me.

I can understand why a 14 year old might go through a phase of believing they are uniquely fascinating and that the world should reorganise itself around their identity epiphanies. What I find harder to tolerate is the insufferable adults.

Being gender non-conforming is not new. Get over yourself. The only genuinely new thing is the expectation that everyone else must engage in grammatical gymnastics to validate someone else's ego.

[Marxe @Marxe]

@YRTViva Thank you, a simple sticker with an arrow would help, as the smaller ticket machine is completely behind the larger one.

[Marxe @Marxe]

@YRTViva A sign is needed in the Wellington bus terminal for the Presto machine that is perfectly well hidden behind the Viva ticket machine. We lost the bus because we couldn’t figure out how to pay. Someone else had the same exp. Thanks!

[Marxe @Marxe]

@BlendrNews @grok what are the 15 countries that are trying to pass this law?

[F🍁CK CARNEY🇨🇦 @bashscriptorz]

🚨 KILL BILL S-206 🚨
The Enforcement Switch Behind Every Other Bill

⚠️ The Distraction Strategy

Parliament is flooding Canadians with dozens of bills at once — each controversial, each alarming — for one reason: to hide the keystone bill that makes them all enforceable.

That bill is S-206.

Different sectors. Different rights. One enforcement engine.

🧩 The Pattern You’re Supposed to Miss

Yes, many bills are advancing at the same time — and they fall into familiar clusters:

Due Process & Court Rights

S-206 — Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs)

C-63 — Online Harms

C-27 — Digital Charter / AI regulation

Parliamentary Power Shift

C-26 — Critical Cyber Systems

C-11 / C-18 — Online Streaming & News control

Property & Land Control

C-234 — Agriculture restrictions

S-241 — Jane Goodall Act

C-49 — Atlantic Accord amendments

Speech, Assembly & Religion

C-63, C-261, C-70, C-9

Each attacks a different freedom.
All depend on one thing: the power to punish without courts.

🎯 The Keystone: Bill S-206

S-206 is the hub.
It allows federal departments to issue penalties without:

hearings

judges

trials

due process

common-law protections

meaningful judicial review

It turns agencies into investigator, prosecutor, judge, and enforcer — all in one.

That is not democracy.

⚙️ What S-206 Enables

Data alone cannot control people. Punishment does.

S-206 is the enforcement engine behind:

Digital ID

CBDCs

Carbon allowances

Smart-meter penalties

Travel scoring

Online speech controls

Zoning & land-use mandates

Biosafety / One-Health rules

Remove the keystone → the entire system collapses.

🧠 Why So Many Bills at Once?

Because if Canadians focus on S-206, the agenda dies.

The noise is intentional:

Scatter attention

Exhaust the public

Create outrage fatigue

Prevent organized resistance

Slip the core bill through unnoticed

This is how large control systems are built.

🏗️ The Digital Governance Architecture

What they’re building:

Digital ID → who you are

CBDCs → what you buy

Carbon scoring → how you move & heat your home

Online harms laws → what you say

Smart meters → how you use utilities

Biosafety rules → what you grow or own

None of it works without instant penalties.
That penalty system is S-206.

💣 If S-206 Falls, Everything Else Fails

If S-206 is stopped:

Digital ID enforcement collapses

CBDC controls collapse

Carbon rationing collapses

Online harms penalties collapse

Smart-meter enforcement collapses

Surveillance becomes information-only

Remove the hub → the wheel falls off.

📢 The Message Canadians Must Hear

The other bills are distractions.
S-206 is the enforcement engine.

If we fight 20 bills, we lose.
If we stop one, we win.

Kill Bill S-206 — now.

🏛View the current status of Senate Bill S-206 here: https://t.co/CCp5NHb8T4

[irmgard @gardirms]

250,000+ British girls.

What's included in this report is fucking harrowing:

- A baby was abused and had cigarettes stubbed out on it while the mother was forced to watch; the baby was then killed.
- Girls were set on fire.
- Girls were sent to “red rooms” to be tortured, some of them killed, some of it livestreamed.
- One girl was raped by a dog while men bet on whether it would vaginally or anally rape her.
- Girls were forced to have abortions with knitting needles.
- Glass bottles, keys, baseball bats, and other objects were forced inside them, some shattering.
- Girls were gang-raped by dozens of men at a time in “party houses.”
- Girls were whipped, hung upside down, suffocated, and urinated on.
- Girls as young as 5 or 6 were tied up and abused.
- Girls were locked in dog cages.
- Girls were branded with an “M” for Muhammad.
- Girls were threatened with being killed and fed to pigs.
- Girls were mocked for wearing a crucifix during the rapes.

All of this was carried out by predominantly South Asian, Pakistani men, with smaller numbers from Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, Bangladeshi, and Iraqi men.

And yet perpetrators were let off, authorities turned a blind eye, and it continues to this day because people are scared of being called racist.

Anyone who covered for this needs to face the death penalty alongside all of those who hurt these girls.

I'm glad Rupert Lowe and everyone else behind this put this together; it needs to be seen by everyone.

[Dan Mazier @DanMazierMP]

We are about to walk into the health committee where the cameras will be off and Conservative MPs will be silenced from speaking publicly about the failed $300 MILLION PrescribeIT program.

Nothing says transparency like hiding the meeting from Canadians.

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

‼️BREAKING

Canadian law-enforcement is freaking out because they are losing the battle for C-22

they are PUSHING HARD for encryption access

Sorry guys, no one trusts you, or Canada, with the keys...... The entire world saw what you did to the truckers.

[BlendrNews @BlendrNews]

France, the UK, Canada, and 11 others banned kids from social media at nearly the same time, with nearly the same law.

If your government actually answered to you, its laws wouldn't arrive on the same schedule as thirteen others.

[Fuckin’ Princess @8WithaTiara]

Menopause is such a fun little season of life
You're exhausted by 2 PM, wide awake at 3 AM, overstimulated by group texts, mysteriously puffier than yesterday, your brain clocks out mid-sentence, and you are one chewing sound away from a felony.
I love that for us

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

Bill C-34 creates a social media ban for Canadians under 16 at the expense of all Canadians' privacy.

Sections 26, 27(1), and 27(2) of Bill C-34 require that affected social media platforms “implement age-verification and age-estimation measures designed to prevent a person under the age of 16 from being able to have an account with, or be otherwise registered with,” those social media platforms.

Bill C-34 requires that such measures must provide for the “protection” and eventual “destruction” of “personal information that is collected for age-verification or age-estimation purposes.”

It is not yet clear how this will be accomplished. What is clear is that these measures must be “effective.” Users commonly verify their age by submitting government-issued identification documents, such as driver’s licenses or passports. And, the technology exists for social media platforms to estimate the ages of users through biometric data, e.g., facial geometry, eye shape, skin elasticity, hairline, etcetera.

This age-verification and age-estimation monitoring will not be limited to Canadians under age 16. For social media platforms to determine access eligibility for any user, platforms will have to evaluate the access eligibility of every user.

The goal of Bill C-34 is not merely to remove Canadians under age 16 from affected social media platforms but to keep them off those platforms. To achieve this goal, social media platforms may be compelled to adopt ongoing age-verification/estimation measures to ensure continued compliance.

However affected social media platforms satisfy these requirements, Bill C-34 fundamentally reimagines how all Canadians access social media.

This Bill deputizes affected social media platforms into forcing Canadians to surrender more data as a precondition of participation in the digital public square. This, in turn, raises serious concerns about Canadians' privacy rights and may engage constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure - guaranteed by section 8 of the Charter.

Read the full text of the bill here: https://t.co/BAHnXrsJIR

[Tim Somerwille @TimSomerwille]

This image was shown at a parade in Brampton by #Khalistani terrorists.
It is clearly a child wearing a suicide vest.
#cdnpoli

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

Bill C-8 gives Liberal MPs the power to delete you from the internet.

No judge.
No trial.
No due process.

Just a politician deciding you’re a threat.

In 2026. In Canada.🚨

This isn’t safety legislation.
It’s a censorship bill with a friendly name. 🇨🇦🚨

#CdnPoli #BillC8 #FreeSpeech