MaryJane

🇺🇸 🇨🇦 just an American girl living in communist Canada.

[Travis @NihiloX]

Should we offer 300K to @MrsErikaKirk to debate @RealCandaceO?

I'd pay to watch that.

[Jody Chase @JodyChaseTN]

🚨 THE LIST OF MEN WHO TRIED TO TAKE DOWN A PREGNANT CANDACE OWENS — AND FAILED: 😂

Blake Neff — FAILED
Andrew Kolvet — FAILED
Ben Shapiro — FAILED
Steven Crowder — FAILED
Tim Pool — FAILED
Jeremy Boreing — FAILED
Dan Bongino — FAILED
Nick Fuentes — FAILED
Tyler Bowyer — FAILED
Rabbi Shmuley — FAILED
Victor Marx — FAILED
David Harris Jr. — FAILED
Andrew Wilson — FAILED

All these men lined up to take their shot at a pregnant woman raising four children… and somehow SHE'S STILL STANDING. 😭😂

Alright, fellas…

WHO'S READY TO STEP UP AND FAIL NEXT? 😂

[MaryJane @MaryJ3722]

@southmatinee2 She’s so ugly..

[Faith Driver @FaithDrivUr]

CRYSTAL CLEAR footage of SHOOTER exiting the parking lot. @charliekirk11 @RealCandaceO

[Ricky Zaccaglino @RickyTheGuido]

Where can I find a compact mini Jeep Wrangler with the oval tires like this?

[Camilo @CGue1116]

La mujer, al darse cuenta de que el gato con discapacidad para caminar intenta seguirla con todas sus fuerzas, lo toma inmediatamente en sus brazos y lo abraza con cariño.

[Creepy.org @creepydotorg]

Angelika Tartanova, a 33-year-old Russian model, lost nearly half her skull after being severely beaten by her boyfriend, wealthy construction businessman Dmitry Kuzmin.

The attack left her with severe brain damage. She was unable to speak for months and required several operations and extensive rehabilitation.

Kuzmin was later charged with attempted murder and faced up to eight years in a Russian prison or being sent to fight in Ukraine.

But before he could stand trial, he suddenly died of a heart attack while under house arrest. Angelika survived and continues to recover.

[Maya. @CandaceGuardian]

Dear Heavenly Father, we pray for Candace Owens as she enters tomorrow’s debate with Andrew Wilson. 🙏

Lord, strengthen her, grant her wisdom, knowledge, courage, and clarity. May she speak boldly & truthfully.
We place the outcome in Your hands. In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏🏽🤍

[BabylonBibi @BabylonBiBi]

@RealCandaceO Can't really blame him for trying to spin this thing.

[MaryJane @MaryJ3722]

@JustTheTweets17 This guys needs to stop being so desperate and get off the internet to rebuild his reputation. What a loser. I swear she only agreed out of pity

[enemycharlie @enemycharlie]

Hi, I'm Charlie, the person that debated Andrew Wilson on the Whatever podcast and revealed that his wife, Rachel, had five children with three different men. I usually wouldn't dignify Rachel Wilson with a serious response, but I feel compelled to clear up her lies on the off chance the Wilson's try to use me as a cudgel against Candace Owens. Long response below. I won't respond to the Wilson's further. Tagging @RealCandaceO for posterity's sake, though I doubt she'll see this in the deluge of Wilson related nonsense.

1.Candace Owens and her viewers are not "siding" with me. They don't know who I am and they don't care. If they did, they wouldn't "side" with me because we are not politically aligned. But they would still judge Andrew for being reactive.

2.There is no context to add to the clip that makes Andrew Wilson look any better. I am not responsible for Andrew Wilson's emotions. I remained calm while Andrew, Rachel, and the superchats insulted me. Andrew flew off the handle with very little provocation and made an ass out of himself. That's not my fault.

3.The framing of the clip is not deceptive. I was polite until Wilson called me stupid. The reason no one wants to watch the first four hours of the debate is because it's a cordial conversation with little substance. I did nothing to trigger Wilson calling me stupid, other than remaining unconvinced that my life would be better off without feminism.

4.I didn't lie about Rachel. It is true that she has had five children with three different men. She has admitted that. I was wrong, however, about her having been married twice before. I thought that she had been married to all of her baby daddies, but she only married 2/3. The Wilson's did not correct this detail during the broadcast, which is interesting. I also thought that Rachel was more than a few years older than Andrew. I learned that she's somewhere between 3-5 years older than him. Ftr, I wasn't going for her looks. She looks a little younger than her husband. I wanted to make a point about the way Andrew has denigrated older women in the past while being married to one.

5.She could potentially be referring to me describing her and her husband as traditional, which she claims they aren't. I don't think I need to address how silly that semantic argument is when they're peddling conservative Christian Orhtodox family values lol.

6.I did apologize to Rachel, but not for lying. Because I didn't. Andrew and Rachel felt compelled to tell me that one of Rachel's ex's had abused her, so I apologized if the discussion had brought up any bad memories. I think I regret that though. She's an adult in charge of her own feelings and the circumstances that ended her past relationships are irrelevant. Many of the women the Wilson's judge have certainly made choices influenced by abuse and haven't been shown the grace Rachel shows herself.

7.I didn't tell Rachel that she would have been better off aborting her kids. I didn't bring up abortion at all. Andrew and Rachel kept asking me if I thought they should have aborted their kids and I said maybe, it's what I would have done and I would have been better off for it. I'd have to rewatch for the exact phrasing. Regardless, there's nothing to apologize for there. If she's proud of her choices, my feelings on the matter shouldn't bother her.

8.I'm not going to address any of the gay and trans stuff because I think that the discrepancies there are fairly obvious.

https://t.co/8MbwnRjD3n fact, Andrew refused to speak to or look at me after the debate. He ran out and hid on the balcony. I went to go try to shake his hand and he ran back inside and wouldn't make eye contact.

10.I look forward to watching Candace Owens rip Andrew a new one. The Right is moving away from Israel and the Wilson's made a poor decision in siding with TPUSA.

[MaryJane @MaryJ3722]

@paleochristcon I can’t wait to see the beat down not you but your fake wife deserves.

[Bren @bren45000]

Candace: Erika killed Charlie.

Andrew: I disagree. Let’s debate?

Candace: Sure! But you need to pay me 300k, you must debate at my house, I’m allowed to have an earpiece in so my team can feed me answers using Chat GPT. And oh! You CANNOT ask me to provide evidence to support my claims that Erika killed Charlie.

WTF?

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Charlie Kirk hated this reporter Brandy. So much so that when she contacted me almost immediately after his assassination, I had a visceral reaction—told her to kick rocks, and reminded her how nasty she had been to Charlie and TPUSA.
It is of course, expected that Charlie’s wife didn’t care about that at all and chose to open the doors up, and grant Brandy an interview— despite the nasty articles that Brandy wrote about Charlie which are STILL available on the internet.
I have learned that Erika prefers to grieve with Charlie’s enemies. I’m glad Brandy included my response to her in this trash piece.

[Ian Carroll @IanCarrollShow]

Candace’s claim is that the fed narrative is a lie and so she investigates every possible lead and theory.

Andrew’s (stated) position is that Tyler Robinson did it alone and the evidence is so strong that he’ll wipe the floor with anyone that wants to debate that.

But Andrew’s actual goal seems to be to try to quote farm a bunch of out of context moments from throughout Candace’s year long investigation to try to win word games interrogating her body of work.

Because he’s scared to debate the central point- the feds, TPUSA’s, and his claim that the evidence is overwhelming that Tyler did it all on his own.

It’s even implied that the evidence is so overwhelming that it’s morally wrong for Candace to investigate at all.

Candace is offering Andrew the opportunity of a lifetime right now. But she’s correctly asserting that the first topic of discussion should be the actual evidence in the murder if Charlie Kirk. Not Andrew’s opinion of Candace’s podcast. Though she graciously offered to field all his very important concerns about her show in the second half of the discussion.

The only reason he would be saying no at this point is because he doesn’t want the central point to be about the fed narrative and the overwhelming evidence. Because Andrew doesn’t seem to actually affirmatively believe that.

He’s just interested in trying to mud wrestle with snippets of Candace’s past work.

That’s how it looks to me from out here having watched them go back and forth all day.

It’s amusing. But I hope Andrew actually takes the opportunity. Im sure it’ll make great television.

[Nikki @nikkiknoticing]

@Rach4Patriarchy Or you knew it was always about in-person stipulations and you’re changing your story now 🤷‍♀️

[MaryJane @MaryJ3722]

@Rach4Patriarchy You are so dumb, the attempt of you trying to now say she was referring to him not smoking over video is the most reatrded excuse you can use. You moron she meant the in person debate. Why the fuck would she care if it’s cover the computer.

[MaryJane @MaryJ3722]

@Rach4Patriarchy She’s pregnant you retard ..

[Maureen ☘️ @maude_zillaaa]

@RealCandaceO @Rach4Patriarchy I really regret buying your feminism book. I thought you were fascinating on Rogan and i really grew to respect your work but once i saw you and your husband buying into the TPUSA fed slop narrative and now this… YIKES