@recovery4455 ๐ If anything, being apologetic should be a plus. At least he has the humility to acknowledge when heโs wrong and take accountability. Some people make mistakes and double down he makes them and says sorry. Thatโs a good place to start.
He messed up, owned it and apologized. Accountability taken. But the outrage brigade wants a lifetime subscription over one incident. ๐At least he had the courage to apologize some of you are still waiting to apologize for the nonsense you tweet daily. relax! ๐
@ZeeroBrain He was wrong, and he owned it. He came out, apologized and took responsibility. What more accountability are we demanding? Condemn the mistake, yes but letโs also acknowledge when someone admits they were wrong and moves forward.
@98series@cristianwaniaye@HeathensRFC@OfoyrwothAaron ๐ Quite obvious indeed. Whatโs even more obvious is that you volunteered yourself for a question I never directed at you. I didnโt mention any name, yet somehow you found yourself in the frame. Should I be asking why? ๐
@DaudiKabanda If every Ugandan who disagrees with the regime is a foreign agent, then perhaps the problem isn't foreign influence but the government's inability to answer legitimate questions from its own citizens.
@HuduHussein@ntvuganda@GovUganda This is a very myopic view. Bias is subjective, and criticism of public officials is not the same as endangering the public good. Article 43 was never intended to shield those in power from scrutiny. A free press must be able to question, criticize those who wield authority.
@Brianw256@UCC_ED@muhoozi_s I disagree. Holding power to account is not political activism,it's journalism. A newsroom that refuses to challenge wrongdoing isn't being neutral. it's failing in its duty to the public.