Fen

Theoretician, Sociologist, Stirnerite, Post-Irony.
Lifestylist, Misesian Econ, Ego-Capitalist, Hyper-Individualist.
The Divisionary.

(Yes I'm Autistic)

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

Nobody Gets Me Like Fen Does....

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@brainrotpostig Let me land in Rapist Thrills.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@KartalMusti72 @LiteralMem3s Why is he still crying? Why did he take his phone to the repair shop?

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

And, it's gone. Goodbye gifted premium.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

Looks like that blue check is under review. Knowing my small account, probably won't mean anything.

Cool while it lasted.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@brainrotpostig This is NOT funny!

Is what I would say, but the British guy is simply too funny.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@Boijimer "Who watches Roblox Porn?"

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

If someone says a yes in a circumstance they're forced in, they still said yes. You don't know if they don't actually want it, you only know what they said.

There is no reason to believe it as a lie if there is no sign of it being a lie. Therefore, it is understandable that the forcer hears a yes as honest consent, otherwise the person he forces would've never said it.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@Mahikuro_ But a no wasn't said, a yes was said.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@legoanimegirl

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@LiteralMem3s Clever one.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

@theEliteTM_ @LiteralMem3s Crazy that I'm seeing this dude again. It annoys me how much this guy just clickbaits with terms Liberal & Conservative.

I'm glad I left the Alt-Lite pipeline.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

Fixed Reality is an ontological Realm of limitations, an Absurdity that can't simply just be annihilated like any other spook.

I reside within this, stuck in hopeless Mortality, full of despair that brings therapy & solace as I close myself in my mind, dreaming of The Spectrum, awaiting my synthesis with Ædraianne, yet hopeless in my limitations until the day I die a non-volitional death. In this sense, I am a Gnostic. This realm has nothing for me, I want to get out of it & be in The Spectrum.

This is my Kafkaesque.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

Please, if you can, try not to look at Stirner's theory as an Authoritative doctrine.

You don't have to agree with everything Stirner says, hell you don't even have to use his words. His ideas are Non-Dogmatic on purpose, just because Stirner was a Market Socialist of some sort, doesn't mean you have to be like him. Emma Goldman sure wasn't with her Communism, I sure ain't with my Capitalism, there's no harm in you trying things out, so long as you recognize that you don't need them. Goldman didn't need Communism, I don't need Capitalism, but we choose to use them.

This is the exact fluidity that Stirner built his theory for; the meaninglessness & the contingency of everything, symbolized in the perspective of the Egoist.

[Fen @MaskedFennec]

My Possible Contentions with Rand's Objectivism That Aren't Simply Max Stirner, and Why I Left & Haven't Returned Since
Note: I don't intend to argue, because it ultimately doesn't change my predicament. Trying to convince me just proves what I said in Anti-Philosophy & Religion, because it feels like trying to get me to disavow my own beliefs for the "superior" Religion. I don't intend to change your beliefs, I rather you show me the same courtesy.
-

(Sentiment & Semantics)
My first notable issue during my Objectivist times were the difference in sentiment & semantics. Ayn Rand spoke of Normative ideas in terms of Virtue & Vice, but I had an issue with those terms & used Right & Wrong instead to give a more descriptive view, per my Analytic alignments. My reasonings with her Ethics were much more descriptive & Analytical. This is a weaker contention, I don't think it was a big enough divergence, but it didn't seem sound to other Objectivists.

(Divisionary Theory)
I had grown some issues with Objectivism via my own ideas, and took the time to create my own theories that I thought would've benefitted Objectivism, but my whole theory was hindered by a questionable origin. Fennec Thought's origin is the character Fen, because Fen embodies Liberty, Nobility, Polarity. I don't have that, and so my origin with my theory is missing, I need one of my own. So I ultimately realized I can't hold both Theories, so I chose my own & reached a conclusion that led to Max Stirner.

(Anti-Philosophy & Religion)
I think a notable issue with Objectivism is its inescapable dogmatism, regardless of Open variants. Philosophy, in my own words, is built to work with ideas & theories that are ultimately open to critique & challenge. Objectivism's assertions make it seem like these are undeniable & uncontestable truths, which is Religious. "To deny A=A, you must apply A=A" is like saying "To deny the existence of God, you must use your God-given resources." I contend this because, while it can be an applicable axiom, its soundness is not open to interpretation, as if disagreeing makes you a bad person.
-

((My Leave & My Clarification))
My first hand reason for leaving wasn't very pronounced. It was my first time leaving the very thing that got me into the world of Philosophy, but I feel like it needed to be done if I wanted to continue to work with things on my own. I don't hate Objectivism, do not take my leave the wrong way, I have merely moved on & still think it was very insightful; hence why I would prefer the term Post-Objectivist. I know there will be disagreements, in fact that's what I'm wanting, because it keeps things Philosophical. Just know that I'm more mentally stable with my current beliefs, I'm even feeling like Metaphysics isn't all that bad now, and Max Stirner helped me understand all of it better, in my own way.