🚨 “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” — AB 2624
A government that moves to limit transparency is a government that has something to hide.
AB 2624: the “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” raises serious concerns about the future of investigative journalism in California.
This bill would expand restrictions around recording and documenting inside certain facilities, including organizations that receive government funding. In practice, that means journalists and independent investigators could face legal penalties simply for documenting what’s happening inside taxpayer-funded operations.
Think about that.
The very people trying to expose fraud, abuse, or mismanagement could be the ones punished.
This bill is backed by CHIRLA—an organization that has received millions in taxpayer funding over the years while also taking strong and often controversial positions on immigration policy and enforcement.
Now the same ecosystem benefiting from public dollars is supporting legislation that could limit scrutiny and reduce transparency.
Californians deserve the opposite.
If taxpayer money is being spent, the public has a right to know how it’s being used. Journalists should be protected for exposing the truth—not threatened with penalties.
Transparency isn’t optional
@CyHusain@mjsolen@hearinladotcom That *article* is some dumb people shit. Smh
You choosing to blame the boogeyman instead of the clear and obvious failure of our city officials is the problem.
@allenanalysis The question YOU need to ask, is are you prepared for the violence coming from your party’s actions?
Liberals shot at Trump, we coming for heads in CA.
We won’t miss.
⚠️ CALIFORNIA OPENED THE DOOR 29 DAYS EARLY... AND ALMOST NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT.
For 29 days before Election Day, campaigns can reportedly see who's voted, who's holding a ballot, and exactly where to focus their efforts.
Then comes the part that will make your jaw hit the floor...
If workers can choose which doors to knock on and which ballots to collect, what does that mean for the ballots they leave behind?
Once you hear how this system works, you may never look at Election Night results the same way again. 👀🔥
Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments ⬇️
@allenanalysis Despite ALL the videos and evidence, this stuttering fool says “what evidence”.
Only liberals are stupid enough to believe this ignorant…
California Is Blocking a Federal Audit of Its Voter Rolls
California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including:
-Gym membership card
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants)
Full list: https://t.co/BvfviJsYG8
This is permitted when a voter fails to provide a Social Security number or driver’s license at registration. Our office believes this policy deserves a closer look.
We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.
On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on voters’ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot.
For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections.
@AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context. We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed.
What are they afraid of?
California allows every illegal in the state access to free taxpayer funded health insurance
This means EVERY illegal in the state gets an insurance card, and that’s all they need to register to vote and be sent a mail in ballot
Let’s take a look at each item that allows voter registration, meaning an automatic mail in ballot sent to your home
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Gym membership card
-Insurance card (California gives all illegals free health insurance coverage)
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Tens of thousands of Spencer Pratt voters are now receiving rejection letters from the county clerk saying that their ballots were not counted due to signature irregularities. Yet, Governor Gavin Newsom just passed legislation that would make it illegal for anyone conducting oversight, to contest signatures that they deemed fraudulent. Democrats allow ballots to be signed with an X, a -, or a 🙂 to pass and count, but all of a sudden, only Republican signatures are being flagged for irregularities, rejected, and not counted. 🤔 One of these California Republican voters said that his signature has been on file for over 20 years and there has never been an issue until he voted for Spencer Pratt. Nithya Ramen has beaten Spencer Pratt by less than 3000 votes. There are at least 18,000 Pratt voters who received this letter saying their votes were rejected.
WATCH: Some Skid Row residents tell @FOXLA they’ve been offered cash, cigarettes and other incentives to sign political petitions and paperwork.
The allegations come days after a longtime petition circulator pleaded guilty in a federal voter registration case.
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Tens of thousands of Spencer Pratt voters are now receiving rejection letters from the county clerk saying that their ballots were not counted due to signature irregularities. Yet, Governor Gavin Newsom just passed legislation that would make it illegal for anyone conducting oversight, to contest signatures that they deemed fraudulent. Democrats allow ballots to be signed with an X, a -, or a 🙂 to pass and count, but all of a sudden, only Republican signatures are being flagged for irregularities, rejected, and not counted. 🤔 One of these California Republican voters said that his signature has been on file for over 20 years and there has never been an issue until he voted for Spencer Pratt. Nithya Ramen has beaten Spencer Pratt by less than 3000 votes. There are at least 18,000 Pratt voters who received this letter saying their votes were rejected.
This aged horrifically.
California politicians dunked on Elon and helped drive out SpaceX, Tesla jobs, engineers, suppliers, and the tax base.
Now SpaceX is headed for a $1.75T IPO.
“Message received” may be the most expensive political own-goal in California history.
@nithyavraman Imagine your kids having to grow up with a mother so hated by the city in which she lives.
We’ll force you out of here one way or another you fraud.