MKC

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Marsattaqueblog @ClaireMartel47 Donc sur l’échec du SCAF, la fin du cloud de combat européen au profit de la commande à Helsing, le timing de cette commande et de celui du projet Team gen 6 et l’arrêt du MGS, selon vous, les responsabilités de l’échec sont equi-pondérées entre Allemagne et France ?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@ClaireMartel47 Je ne parlais pas de votre poste mais de celui auquel vous réagissiez quant au succès du léopard 2.

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Stoonbrace @KampfmitKette Are you sure Germany realized how dangerous Russia was when they decided to cut military spending and rely on Russia for oil and gas?
Are you sure Trump is a reliable partner?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Peter63712585 @FTusa284 Engine? Does MTU know to build a jet engine ?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@kreafka @Bjoern__M Is France buying F35?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@FalkTG @brisavoine Germany bought russia Gaz wsh too long, compromised with China to try preserve its market shares (failed), is buying american weapons and clouds, and is massively polluting air while having a very expensive energy. How is that reliable ?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@D2055de @Defence_Index Germany was given the lead on combat cloud and drones + MGCS. France on the NGF. But that wasnt enough for Airbus and germany , who also tried to steal dassault and Safran IP. Go figure why the project failed ? 🤡. Is germany buying more F 35?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@boris_beissner « And Europe's China policy is still too slow and too soft. » mostly because of germany.

[MKC @MatK2413]

@andreaswinckler Fact : UK and Japan have planes carriers . They don’t have the same operational needs as germany. Dont discover it too late…again…

[MKC @MatK2413]

@cyprien_ronze Je ne suis pas sûr que plus de centralisation européenne soit la solution. Elle est responsable de nombreux échecs. Les initiatives souveraines d’états capable de mener à bien des projets adaptés à leurs besoins et au marché tout en étant ITAR free sont elles des succès (rafale)

[MKC @MatK2413]

@eeldenden @MarcusErve Facts: Airbus, the civilian activity branch is mostly French regarding both conception and production. Airbus, the military branche, is most german. And it never produced a sovereign or itar free fighter plane. Dassault, and did a times.

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Peter63712585 @snarkl @Starkiller_29 @ArnoGottschalk Helsing in Dassault territory? It is like saying sovereignity is too expansive in this world. You arent serioud kid.

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Starkiller_29 @Peter63712585 @snarkl @ArnoGottschalk Germany thinks depending on Trump is clever. Is it reasonable and chepear?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Peter63712585 @Starkiller_29 @ArnoGottschalk American can’t open the straight neither. But France protected its allies in the gulf region when UK and germany where nowhere to be seen. Germany soft power ? To beg american to have american nuclear weapons on german soil and to buy F35?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@CPons_UK @LesEchos Disons qu’Airbus avait un grand intérêt pour la propriété intellectuelle de Dassault et que MTU avait un grand intérêt pour la propriété intellectuelle de Safran.

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Peter63712585 @Starkiller_29 @ArnoGottschalk France made the choice to be able to build nuclear subs and carriers among with sovereign and itar free planes and you brag about assault rifles? 🤡 Who is pathetic?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@Peter63712585 @Starkiller_29 @ArnoGottschalk To be fair France has nuclear weapons, nuclear powered subs and carrier and is able to project forces anywhere in the world. Germany has a weak flet and doesn’t have sovereign itar free planes. France was supposed to have the lead on the NGF and germany on MGCS. Best athlete ?

[MKC @MatK2413]

@jeanbap59962914 @KlinkertBrigitt MTU a appris de Safran depuis 2017 leurs ingénieurs travaillent ensemblent depuis 9 ans. Et MTU a acquis des savoir faire sur les parties froides grâce a Safran. L’Allemagne a davantage profité de ces 9 ans que la France.